BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > E90/E92 M3 Technical Topics > Engine, Transmission, Exhaust, Drivetrain, ECU Software Modifications
 
EXXEL Distributions
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      02-09-2017, 02:08 PM   #45
Patrón
PAZUZU
Patrón's Avatar
United_States
545
Rep
2,058
Posts

Drives: '15 M4
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: San Antonio, TX

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2015 BMW M4  [0.00]
2009 BMW M3  [10.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by MShift View Post
Maybe I misunderstood and you may be right. I had interpreted "constant whistle" as always whistling throughout the RPM range, not sitting at idle.
yea mine doesn't really make an audible whistling until above 2k and depending on throttle position.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matheus View Post
The whistle only come out when you left the throttle.
Specially if you are in higher RPM. At idle the BPV is venting air, but you Just can't hear, cause it's not so much air.
Above 2k RPM you can hear the whistle, but only if you left the throttle off.
With WOT there is not any whistle, cause the BPV is closed to create pressure inside the system.
my thoughts too.
__________________

2009 M3 DCT ESS625+ SOLD
2015 M4 BSM/Silverstone F4LCON
@texasMclub IG @jagemoets
Appreciate 0
      02-09-2017, 02:48 PM   #46
MShift
OG
MShift's Avatar
217
Rep
696
Posts

Drives: MW '13 E92
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Miami

iTrader: (3)

ah partial throttle... its normal for a bpv on a supercharged car to vent at partial throttle, but it is generally routed back into the manifold. As for the metered air, ESS uses the factory ECU and sensors with a tune to adjust for the additional air. I'd imagine venting to atm is throwing the AFR off, but maybe not enough to cause an issue or the ecu is smart enough to make up for it by removing fuel. Those would be my guesses as to why VF said it doesnt matter. Personally, I'd use it the way you're supposed to and plumb it back in.

With the number of supercharged cars on this forum, I'm surprised no one with real knowledge has chimed in.

Edit: one last thing...if what you're looking for is the bov noise while minimizing these issues.. there are some options out there that do both and are adjustable. They will recirc at partial throttle, but will vent to atm under hard vac. Might be able to get rid of your whistling on partial while still getting your bov noises on shifts.

Last edited by MShift; 02-09-2017 at 03:00 PM..
Appreciate 0
      02-09-2017, 04:08 PM   #47
Patrón
PAZUZU
Patrón's Avatar
United_States
545
Rep
2,058
Posts

Drives: '15 M4
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: San Antonio, TX

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2015 BMW M4  [0.00]
2009 BMW M3  [10.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by spr View Post
Btw. It looks like I may have discovered why my kit was acting weird. The temp sensor is showing -456F! I'm going to replace it and the thermostat as the code is for both. Fingers crossed to get back 580rwhp!
can you explain what temp sensor?
Quote:
Originally Posted by MShift View Post
ah partial throttle... its normal for a bpv on a supercharged car to vent at partial throttle, but it is generally routed back into the manifold. As for the metered air, ESS uses the factory ECU and sensors with a tune to adjust for the additional air. I'd imagine venting to atm is throwing the AFR off, but maybe not enough to cause an issue or the ecu is smart enough to make up for it by removing fuel. Those would be my guesses as to why VF said it doesnt matter. Personally, I'd use it the way you're supposed to and plumb it back in.

With the number of supercharged cars on this forum, I'm surprised no one with real knowledge has chimed in.

Edit: one last thing...if what you're looking for is the bov noise while minimizing these issues.. there are some options out there that do both and are adjustable. They will recirc at partial throttle, but will vent to atm under hard vac. Might be able to get rid of your whistling on partial while still getting your bov noises on shifts.
I don't care for the noise at all, just trying to reduce hot air into the intake.
__________________

2009 M3 DCT ESS625+ SOLD
2015 M4 BSM/Silverstone F4LCON
@texasMclub IG @jagemoets
Appreciate 0
      02-09-2017, 04:16 PM   #48
spr
Major
93
Rep
1,089
Posts

Drives: F80 M3; e92 ESS650+ M3
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Diego

iTrader: (1)

The water temp sensor.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrón View Post
can you explain what temp sensor?

I don't care for the noise at all, just trying to reduce hot air into the intake.
Appreciate 1
Patrón544.50
      04-05-2017, 11:40 AM   #49
spr
Major
93
Rep
1,089
Posts

Drives: F80 M3; e92 ESS650+ M3
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Diego

iTrader: (1)

I'm looking into this again to seek more efficiency after I installed my ice tank and reversed the flow and added a bilge pump. BTW, the smallest RULE bilge grossly outflows the stock ESS pump. My normal driving IAT from OBD port is now 100 with a much quicker drop back. The system went from 1 gallon to 7 gallons.

What is the size of the BOV to the rotoform? 1.25" at BOV and 1" at roto or the other 1" is the EGR? ? I'm thinking about running a very long hose to the front of the car from the BOV to reduce the noise. I may also add a vented puke tank and also block off the EGR. It will be interesting to see how it affects IAT'S I've been logging.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrón View Post
i'm not 100% certain but it could be the bolt & screw adjustments on the Bypass valve BUT since you are getting full boost, i wouldn't mess with anything. the sound is just the bpv doing it's job.



On a similar note. I too disconnected the bypass valve connection to the intake as well as the other vent tube (manifold hoses) to the intake. I believe that it's recirculating hot air back into the intake/blower. I used 1in and 1& 1/4in plumbing end caps (rubber caps with metal clamps) to block off the intake holes. I'm trying to do anything to reduce my intake temps.
__________________
F80 M3 HRE FF04 275/305.

Last edited by spr; 04-05-2017 at 11:48 AM..
Appreciate 0
      04-05-2017, 11:41 AM   #50
spr
Major
93
Rep
1,089
Posts

Drives: F80 M3; e92 ESS650+ M3
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Diego

iTrader: (1)

It's speed density. No MAF or MAP. Doesn't matter.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MShift View Post
I'm not familiar with how the ESS kit does airflow metering, but be careful; you don't want to be venting metered air as it will throw the tune off, make you run rich and lose power. Also, that echoing flutter can be surge from the bpv not opening at all..in which case its a bad thing.
__________________
F80 M3 HRE FF04 275/305.
Appreciate 0
      04-19-2017, 11:31 AM   #51
Patrón
PAZUZU
Patrón's Avatar
United_States
545
Rep
2,058
Posts

Drives: '15 M4
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: San Antonio, TX

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2015 BMW M4  [0.00]
2009 BMW M3  [10.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by spr View Post
I'm looking into this again to seek more efficiency after I installed my ice tank and reversed the flow and added a bilge pump. BTW, the smallest RULE bilge grossly outflows the stock ESS pump. My normal driving IAT from OBD port is now 100 with a much quicker drop back. The system went from 1 gallon to 7 gallons.

What is the size of the BOV to the rotoform? 1.25" at BOV and 1" at roto or the other 1" is the EGR? ? I'm thinking about running a very long hose to the front of the car from the BOV to reduce the noise. I may also add a vented puke tank and also block off the EGR. It will be interesting to see how it affects IAT'S I've been logging.
can you pm me or post here exactly what you mean by "reversed flow"?
__________________

2009 M3 DCT ESS625+ SOLD
2015 M4 BSM/Silverstone F4LCON
@texasMclub IG @jagemoets
Appreciate 0
      04-19-2017, 06:41 PM   #52
M1rider
Retired: 2008 135i /// 2011 1M
M1rider's Avatar
United_States
76
Rep
300
Posts

Drives: 2020 M2 CS / 2010 Techno M3
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NJ

iTrader: (5)

Might help
Attached Images
 
Appreciate 0
      04-20-2017, 09:55 AM   #53
Patrón
PAZUZU
Patrón's Avatar
United_States
545
Rep
2,058
Posts

Drives: '15 M4
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: San Antonio, TX

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2015 BMW M4  [0.00]
2009 BMW M3  [10.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by M1rider View Post
Might help
that photo doesn't display any of the water cooling line routing. just a pick of diff bypass valve than the stock one.
__________________

2009 M3 DCT ESS625+ SOLD
2015 M4 BSM/Silverstone F4LCON
@texasMclub IG @jagemoets
Appreciate 0
      04-29-2017, 01:39 PM   #54
spr
Major
93
Rep
1,089
Posts

Drives: F80 M3; e92 ESS650+ M3
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: San Diego

iTrader: (1)

I made the water flow go backwards. It now runs from the intercooler front fitting to the heat exchanger to the Ess pump then back to ice tank and the bilge pump pushes it back to the rear intercooler fitting. This way it strips the heat first before hitting the ice tank. The prior setup didn't change this as the Ess pump pushes to the heat exchanger. I had to cut the passenger heat exchange hose, move the pump a bit and reverse the fittings in and out for the ESS pump to change the flow back to the tank because again, it was pushing to the heat exchanger before.
__________________
F80 M3 HRE FF04 275/305.
Appreciate 0
      04-29-2017, 08:20 PM   #55
Patrón
PAZUZU
Patrón's Avatar
United_States
545
Rep
2,058
Posts

Drives: '15 M4
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: San Antonio, TX

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2015 BMW M4  [0.00]
2009 BMW M3  [10.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by spr View Post
I made the water flow go backwards. It now runs from the intercooler front fitting to the heat exchanger to the Ess pump then back to ice tank and the bilge pump pushes it back to the rear intercooler fitting. This way it strips the heat first before hitting the ice tank. The prior setup didn't change this as the Ess pump pushes to the heat exchanger. I had to cut the passenger heat exchange hose, move the pump a bit and reverse the fittings in and out for the ESS pump to change the flow back to the tank because again, it was pushing to the heat exchanger before.
Very interesting, do you think it helped lower the water tempature?
__________________

2009 M3 DCT ESS625+ SOLD
2015 M4 BSM/Silverstone F4LCON
@texasMclub IG @jagemoets
Appreciate 0
      04-30-2017, 12:55 PM   #56
BPMSport
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
BPMSport's Avatar
United_States
3387
Rep
7,541
Posts


Drives: Harrop M3 / F10 M5 / F82 M4
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (9)

Garage List
2000 BMW M5  [0.00]
1990 BMW 735i Turbo  [0.00]
2008 BMW M3  [7.50]
2015 BMW M3  [0.00]
2015 BMW M5  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by spr View Post
It's speed density. No MAF or MAP. Doesn't matter.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MShift View Post
I'm not familiar with how the ESS kit does airflow metering, but be careful; you don't want to be venting metered air as it will throw the tune off, make you run rich and lose power. Also, that echoing flutter can be surge from the bpv not opening at all..in which case its a bad thing.
There is a MAP sensor... this is what makes it speed density.
__________________

-----| Like us on Facebook | Instagram || Tuning Information | Remote Coding |-----
----Visit us at www.BPMSport.com - Emotion. Driven. | Toll Free: (888) 557-5133----
Appreciate 0
      04-30-2017, 10:32 PM   #57
R_lara
First Lieutenant
R_lara's Avatar
Dominican Republic
80
Rep
317
Posts

Drives: E90 2009 M3 Ess VT2650, F30 33
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Santo Domingo

iTrader: (0)

I think running it with out recirculating you are loosing clean air that passed through the air filter which is pretty much the only restriction in the intake and that same amount of air has to be filtered in again.
Appreciate 0
      05-01-2017, 06:10 AM   #58
Maxf80M3
Boost Addict
Maxf80M3's Avatar
Canada
174
Rep
460
Posts

Drives: YMB F80 DCT
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Toronto

iTrader: (0)

Has any one rebuilt these bypass valves or the older one ??
Attached Images
   
__________________
F80 BMW M3 DCT YMB
2008 BMW E93 6MT, Ess VT2 625
Appreciate 0
      07-01-2021, 09:59 AM   #59
jdamore
Captain
jdamore's Avatar
433
Rep
855
Posts

Drives: 2008 e92 M3
Join Date: May 2013
Location: New Jersey

iTrader: (4)

Bumping this thread because I was told something very interesting on a FB group. Stupidity is contagious over there but was told this by a "professional" however, its hard for me to believe. The claim is:

If you are venting to atmosphere, by using a small air filter on the intake plenum instead of a cap, you will gain 35hp! The claim is that they found the intake to be restricted and the additional air will give the boost in power.

Anyone actually test this? Far fetched? I'd like to set the record straight. I'll spend the few bucks for a little filter if it actually does something..
Appreciate 0
      07-01-2021, 10:33 AM   #60
SAMM3Y
Colonel
SAMM3Y's Avatar
3085
Rep
2,747
Posts

Drives: 2008 m3
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: NorCal

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdamore View Post
Bumping this thread because I was told something very interesting on a FB group. Stupidity is contagious over there but was told this by a "professional" however, its hard for me to believe. The claim is:

If you are venting to atmosphere, by using a small air filter on the intake plenum instead of a cap, you will gain 35hp! The claim is that they found the intake to be restricted and the additional air will give the boost in power.

Anyone actually test this? Far fetched? I'd like to set the record straight. I'll spend the few bucks for a little filter if it actually does something..
It's an interesting theory, the issue I would have with that is you're sucking in hot static air from inside the engine bay instead of outside rammed air from the outside lower duct. I wouldn't want ANY more heat added to a saturated system which struggles as it is. Also I don't know much about air fluid dynamics but 2 different air sources at different temperatures could create turbulence and work adversely? Maybe someone smarter than me can chime in on that.
__________________
9ers
Appreciate 1
jdamore432.50
      07-01-2021, 12:11 PM   #61
Vuu
Astronaut
Vuu's Avatar
514
Rep
732
Posts

Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Orange County, CA

iTrader: (7)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdamore View Post
Bumping this thread because I was told something very interesting on a FB group. Stupidity is contagious over there but was told this by a "professional" however, its hard for me to believe. The claim is:

If you are venting to atmosphere, by using a small air filter on the intake plenum instead of a cap, you will gain 35hp! The claim is that they found the intake to be restricted and the additional air will give the boost in power.

Anyone actually test this? Far fetched? I'd like to set the record straight. I'll spend the few bucks for a little filter if it actually does something..
I've ran a filter and a cap, there's no difference lol.

I've left it capped now because I don't want to suck in hot air.
__________________
Instagram | @undisclosedm3
"Never think that you are above taking out the trash."
Appreciate 2
jdamore432.50
      01-04-2022, 06:39 PM   #62
B8bydesign
Lieutenant Colonel
B8bydesign's Avatar
United_States
680
Rep
1,527
Posts

Drives: '11 BMW M3
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Charlotte, NC

iTrader: (10)

Garage List
2011 BMW M3  [10.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vuu View Post
I've ran a filter and a cap, there's no difference lol.

I've left it capped now because I don't want to suck in hot air.
Old thread bump, but is 1.5" the correct K&N breather filter size for the VT2-625 kit? I've read both 1.5" and 1.25" online and wasn't sure which is correct.
__________________
New: '11.5 e90 M3 | DCT | Space Gray/Novillo | ZCV | ZCW | ZP2 | ESS 625 | BPM | M Performance | iPE | BC Racing | BPM | iND | LUX | Volk | Coby | Recaro
Sold: '11.5 e92 M3 | DCT | Mineral White/Novillo | ZCP | ZCV | ZCW | ZP2 | M Performance | ACM | BPM | iND | Thule | LUX | Macht Schnell | Broadway Static | Rogue Engineering | BBS | Challenge | Metak
Appreciate 0
      01-04-2022, 08:35 PM   #63
1SloeEm3
Private First Class
83
Rep
132
Posts

Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Riverside

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by B8bydesign View Post
Old thread bump, but is 1.5" the correct K&N breather filter size for the VT2-625 kit? I've read both 1.5" and 1.25" online and wasn't sure which is correct.
I went through the same issue. 1.5 I.D is the correct one.
Appreciate 1
      10-23-2023, 01:36 PM   #64
samtwatson
Registered
0
Rep
2
Posts

Drives: 2011 M3
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: United States

iTrader: (0)

Bumping this. Looking to do the same vent to atmosphere with the ESS G1 kit. Is the breather 1.25" or 1.5"? I've also been told some people are seeing 1-2 psi increase by doing this bypass but I'm in it for the "wooosh!" (6-speed manual here). Thank you for all the information in this thread!
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:20 PM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST