|
|
03-31-2009, 12:11 PM | #23 | |
Lieutenant General
611
Rep 10,407
Posts |
Quote:
As well I'd simply LOVE to run a blind test. I'd be willing to bet you could not feel the bar, nor measure it in lap time improvements. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-31-2009, 09:53 PM | #24 |
Enlisted Member
5
Rep 44
Posts |
What track where you at?
__________________
AW Painted Reflectors, StopTech BBK, TC Kline D/A, LM-R's/Street, CCW C-10's/track, 3M Clear bra and 35% tint by T.O.T.L
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2009, 05:14 PM | #25 | |
47
Rep 410
Posts |
Quote:
Blake, please correct me if I'm wrong. The vehicle feels very different with the bar installed, correct? Not a little. Not "I think it feels stiffer". It really does have a very noticeable change in roll and flatness on the turns. I'm willing to bet that any style rear strut brace, not just the ACS, will improve roll on the E92 M3. It is simply providing rigidity at a point in the body known to roll and flex. This is nothing new. Not ground breaking in anyway, but definitely a worthwhile mod that you can feel. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2009, 05:41 PM | #26 | |
Banned
755
Rep 4,649
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2009, 08:33 PM | #27 | |
Lieutenant General
611
Rep 10,407
Posts |
Quote:
Do I have to repeat my statement about how almost all folks, even tuners, vendors and experienced drivers are easily fooled by the louder = more power = faster phenomena? Psychology is powerful. As is basic engineering kinematics... Once again, do you have the reference I asked about previously? You do realize this statement is an enormous oxymoron, right? If you have some quantified differences please provide the numbers. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2009, 09:11 PM | #28 |
Banned
755
Rep 4,649
Posts |
then name me a test, i'd be more than happy testing it out. skid pad is the only thing that i can possibly think of that might show numbers, and i have access to one.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-01-2009, 10:41 PM | #29 |
Lieutenant General
611
Rep 10,407
Posts |
I'm not saying that one can not feel handling differences. Heck drive a Lotus Elise then drive an old Cadillac. All I was pointing out was that "feel" and "quantifiable" don't belong in the same sentence. I can think of many tests to show that this part does not add rear torsional stiffness, but none of them are particularly easy.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2009, 09:10 AM | #30 |
Super modder
104
Rep 1,973
Posts |
I think it would be easy to prove the point...run the track and get your times, then remove the bar and do it again...that at least is a start to making the statement that the car is more planted...that in my eyes would = better lap times? If you can find someone local to purchase a one piece rear strut brace you could add in a 3rd variable...simple enough?
My .02 is that for a simple bar that $700.00 is insanely expensive...simply insane. There is no real R&D and easy to produce...there has never been any real change over any of the different M3's so why so expensive??????????? M
__________________
SOLD - 2005 E46 M3 ZCP - I/B on black CURRENT - 2011 E90 M3 - meticulously modified 2015 X1 Xdrive 28i |
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2009, 11:26 AM | #31 | |
47
Rep 410
Posts |
Quote:
To answer your question regarding cost, many factors are contributed to the expense. 1. This part is manufactured in Germany. 2. The bar is made a machined out of high grade billet aluminum and treated with a hard anodizing process. 3. R&D and tested on the Nurburgring. 4. TUV approved. 5. Low volume production item. 6. Euro to USD exchange rate. 7. Importation and transit costs. Many can easily replicate the bar's design and manufacture in say Asia, but like all of the other replica parts, this would only be a cosmetic solution. As stated above, the rigidity of the bar is a crucial component to it's function. Using a lesser grade material would substantially effect performance. So we come back to the old topic. What makes more sense? A $450 cosmetic "suspension" component, with sub par materials or a quality product that has been originally designed, tested, and approved for $700. The average M3 customer purchases the vehicle for it's performance capabilities. Are there other vehicles on the market for a better price? Sure, but it's difficult to compete with a tried and tested product like the M3. Unfortunately, some consumers do not take as much time to educate themselves on the tuning of these vehicles. They make purchasing decisions based on price and not quality, fitment, or testing. These purchases enable these replica companies to produce lesser quality parts that are untested and unregulated. This creates a sub level of the industry that gives tuning in general a bad name. I've read many post that say, "you can't expect for aftermarket parts to fit better than OEM." Why? You can expect this. You should expect this. After all, why change a part on your car that is lesser quality than the original part? But you must also expect to pay more for these parts. Tuners work on a production scale much smaller than OE manufactures. The smaller the production the higher the costs. So when we support replica companies we effectively push up the cost of doing business for the original designer/manufacture. This increases the overall price of the product to the consumer. If we slim the profits of these tuners to the point that it is not cost effective to do business properly, we will all suffer. We will suffer from a void of quality products that have been originally designed and tested to legitimately improve performance. BTW, AC Schnitzer is a subsidiary of Kohl BMW. Their affiliation with BMW AG requires them to produce products that are not only TUV approved, but also approved by BMW AG. BMW AG requires ACS to test and prove that all of their products meet or exceed BMW OE manufacturing. This is why ACS is sold at the BMW parts counter in every market in the world. Their commitment and focus to BMW tuning is unmatched by any other tuner in the world. So though it might seem expensive, you can be assured that any original ACS product will be tested and approved to improve your specific BMW's performance. So that's why... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2009, 12:51 PM | #32 | |
Lieutenant General
611
Rep 10,407
Posts |
Here we go. Might get ugly...
Quote:
Again I challenge this. Unless this silly thing is made nearby to the town where the track is I would be willing to bet it was not researched and developed (R&D) AND tested at the Ring. This part is beyond simple. I could design it in a single day, machine it with no CNC equipment, get it anodized the next and installed. My total cost would be about $100, including a $50 lot charge for low volume anodizing. Your credibility is seriously called into question here. I look forward to any evidence to back up your claims whatsoever. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2009, 04:27 PM | #33 | |
47
Rep 410
Posts |
Quote:
What do you know of ACS? Why are you so quick to question their R&D and manufacturing process? I have been to their facility. Met with their designers and engineers. Taken two cars around the Nurburgring with ACS during the testing of their latest racing suspension for the E9X M3. But my guess is you won't take my word for it. If I've lost credibility in your mind, so be it. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-02-2009, 04:51 PM | #34 | |
Lieutenant General
611
Rep 10,407
Posts |
Quote:
I am not a wagering man, but in this case it is like candy from a baby. How about a bet. That should put an end to your drivel. The cross bar part in this strut brace design is NOT: 1. Billet 2. Machined 3. Hard anodized. 4. R AND D-ed at the Nurburgring I would bet pinks on this. Put up or shut up, really. I have ABSOLUTELY nothing against ACS but vendors who have little knowledge of what they sell and provide such false technical information - that is another story. As well I won't be willing to back down from the proposition that this design is fundamentally flawed. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-03-2009, 02:29 AM | #35 |
Colonel
63
Rep 2,426
Posts |
who cares about function as long as it looks nice
__________________
“For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.”
- John 3:16 |
Appreciate
0
|
04-03-2009, 02:47 AM | #36 |
Banned
755
Rep 4,649
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-03-2009, 05:05 PM | #38 |
Brigadier General
142
Rep 3,523
Posts |
Hey swamp2, what makes you so sure it is not billet
"Billet refers to a cast semi finished product. It is also referred to as ingot, particularly for smaller sizes. A billet is typically cast to a rectangular, hexagonal or round cross section compatible with secondary processing, e.g. forging. It can be produced either as coil or cut lengths. Ingots and billets are collectively known as bar stock." Bar stock is pretty common to get and it sounds like it can be machined from it. Blake, are there marks on the metal that you can see through the clearcoat that show it was machined? They will be most likely circumferencial along the top from the milling machine? On the topic of Hardcoat anodizing "Hardcoat Anodizing (Architectural Type III) provides additional protective properties. They are an excellent choice for parts in "high wear" environments. Hard coatings have a Rockwell Hardness Scale rating of C-60 / 70, hardness second only to diamonds. As well as being virtually corrosion-proof, hardcoating resists: scratches and abrasions changes in temperature moisture and humidity mold and fungus salt spray abrasives chemicals petroleum products Hardcoat color choices include black, grays, and clear." Sounds like clear is an option, so things look plausible. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-03-2009, 10:18 PM | #39 | |
Lieutenant General
611
Rep 10,407
Posts |
Quote:
Billet is SOLID bar then machined to shape. Billet is not used to describe extruded tubing which this part is, 99.9% sure. HARD anodizing is black or brown, never clear. Only regular anodize is clear. Regular anodize is very thin and more or less cosmetic with some wear protection. Hard anozdize builds up a few mils (1/1000th of in inch) of thickness and is considerably harder and more wear resistance than regular anozdize. In industry lingo regular is Type I (Chromic acid) or Type II (Sulfuric acid). Hard is Type III which is also Chromic. I have NEVER seen a clear Type III hard. I am virtually certain you can not get it in clear. Even if you could it would be too expensive and not needed on such a part. It only requires a cosmetic anodize. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-03-2009, 10:32 PM | #40 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
111
Rep 1,764
Posts |
Quote:
I do think swamp2 mentioned the most important issue. The thing (I'm not sure what to call it) doesn't do anything for stiffening the chassis that I can see. The vendor may want to clearly show the load case by asking engineering. It can only work in tension nonetheless. I’m willing to look at suggestions? Yet another trinket….. Orb Last edited by Orb; 04-04-2009 at 12:19 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-04-2009, 11:17 AM | #41 | |
Brigadier General
142
Rep 3,523
Posts |
Quote:
Better tires would prob be a better investment. Still is cool. Yes another trinket |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-04-2009, 02:13 PM | #43 |
Major General
686
Rep 6,845
Posts
Drives: 2018 Audi RS5 coupe
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Reston, VA
|
why don't we ask the manufacturer for the testing data they got when they tested at nurburgring?
i am sure they drove a regular M3 and an M3 with the bar installed? i am sure they kept record of all the times they did or they just threw away all this money but in all honesty this strut bar does look very flimsy the thickness of the 2 solid points on either side looks very weak and all this presure its being subjected to is only being help together by the 2 bolts? i have used a front strut brace before and it made a huge difference but my car was a convertible so might not be the same case but i doubt the effectiveness for the rear since that's an enclosed space meaning the rear metal parcel shelf adds ridgity already whereas the front strut brace is the only solid thing between the 2 strut towers since hood doesn't add any ridgity |
Appreciate
0
|
04-04-2009, 04:31 PM | #44 | |
Major General
285
Rep 6,007
Posts |
Quote:
I'm with you on this one. Billet is machined, not cast or extruded.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|