BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > M3 (E90 / E92 / E93) > General M3 Forum (E90 + E92 + E93)
 
GetBMWParts
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      03-19-2011, 10:11 PM   #155
mkoesel
Moderator
United_States
184
Rep
13,842
Posts

 
Drives: 2015 SO/CSAT F80 M3
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canton, MI

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Levi View Post
Sure nothing was confirmed yet, but BMW can't leave it so. THe TT 4.4l V8 is the worst of its category. The new Mercedes 4.7l V8 Biturbo and the the Audi 4.0 TFSI V8 are more efficient and more torquy and powerfull.
Well, first of all the new Audi V8 TFSI is not even on the market yet. But even when it gets here, inside info suggests it will make about 400hp in base form (just like the N63), and 500hp+ in higher output versions (just like the S63).

Second, the Mercedes V8s have been making more power and torque than BMW's for a while now, so nothing new there.

Third, how is lowering the displacement going to help as far as making the engine more competitive? There is no reason they can't improve efficiency with the N63 as is, and still increase engine output as well.

And finally, none of this has any bearing on the reality that there's almost no chance for a V8 in the F3x M3.
__________________
A gen-u-ine BMW eff-eight-zero with them tandem clutches in the transmission and that dad gum sun roof on the top-a da cawr.
Appreciate 0
      03-21-2011, 05:33 PM   #156
swamp2
Lieutenant General
swamp2's Avatar
United_States
215
Rep
10,201
Posts

 
Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego, CA USA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by crackberry View Post
i dont think the next m3 will get sub 4secs from 0-60 or anything along those lines
Perhaps you missed my post #158 just above?
Appreciate 0
      03-31-2011, 08:42 PM   #157
eamon
Captain
eamon's Avatar
32
Rep
790
Posts

 
Drives: 09 e92 335i, 2010 328i (sold)
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Dallas

iTrader: (0)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the m5/6 has always been faster than the m3... Will this mean that if the new m3 will supposedly be sub 4seconds to 60 the other mcars will be even faster than that? That'd be pretty neat to see such a powerful lineup of m cars.
Appreciate 0
      03-31-2011, 09:12 PM   #158
GregW / Oregon
Commander-In-Chief
United_States
137
Rep
7,647
Posts

 
Drives: 2015 M4 Coupe, 2012 ML350
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lake Oswego, OR

iTrader: (2)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by eamon View Post
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the m5/6 has always been faster than the m3... Will this mean that if the new m3 will supposedly be sub 4seconds to 60 the other mcars will be even faster than that? That'd be pretty neat to see such a powerful lineup of m cars.
M5/6 are faster, but nearly equal in QUICKNESS, at least to 62. Those are two different things.
__________________

Greg Lake Oswego, Oregon, USA
2015 M4 Coupe - Silverstone/Sakhir/CF
2012 ML350

Last edited by GregW / Oregon; 03-31-2011 at 09:25 PM.
Appreciate 0
      04-01-2011, 06:11 PM   #159
Brandon26pdx
Lieutenant Colonel
United_States
20
Rep
1,938
Posts

 
Drives: 2011 135i
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Portland, OR

iTrader: (1)

I can't say I'm too excited about the direction they're going in with these new turbocharged cars. They can spin and market till they're blue in the face but turbo engines have their performance compromises and always will. There's always going to be a little bit of lag, loss of throttle response and crispness, and the torque curves are always screwy. A turbo engine that keeps building power all the way to the top will have unacceptable lag for a factory car even with a fancy twinscroll, while one with just a wisp of lag down low will give you a great rush a power in the 2.5-5k rpm range and will fall flat and unexciting in the 5k+ rpm range. Neither one of these scenario's are "///M material" to me.

Last edited by Brandon26pdx; 04-02-2011 at 09:28 PM.
Appreciate 0
      04-01-2011, 08:28 PM   #160
GregW / Oregon
Commander-In-Chief
United_States
137
Rep
7,647
Posts

 
Drives: 2015 M4 Coupe, 2012 ML350
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lake Oswego, OR

iTrader: (2)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandon26pdx View Post
I can't say I'm too excited about the direction they're going in with these new turbocharged cars. They can spin and market till they're blue in face but turbo engines have their performance compromises and always will. There's always going to be a little bit of lag, loss of throttle response and crispness, and the torque curves are always screwy. A turbo engine that keeps building power all the way to the top will have unacceptable lag for a factory car even with a fancy twinscroll, while one with just a wisp of lag down low will give you a great rush a power in the 2.5-5k rpm range and will fall flat and unexciting in the 5k+ rpm range. Neither one of these scenario's are "///M material" to me.
Well, in general you are correct, but engineering can overcome much of this. I venture to say the McLaren MP4-12C with 600 hp & 600 nm torque from 3.8 liters is a good example. 8,500 rpm redline in a twin-turbo V8. Obviously, this is at a different price point than the M3, but suffice to say BMW has some pretty good engineers and pretty good engineering budgets.
__________________

Greg Lake Oswego, Oregon, USA
2015 M4 Coupe - Silverstone/Sakhir/CF
2012 ML350
Appreciate 0
      04-01-2011, 08:37 PM   #161
klammer
Brigadier General
41
Rep
3,245
Posts

 
Drives: 11 spc gry m3 e90, 07 X5
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: chicago

iTrader: (0)

me.[/quote]
Well, in general you are correct, but engineering can overcome much of this. I venture to say the McLaren MP4-12C with 600 hp
__________________
mods: akra evo, dinan 3.45 diff, ess akra tune, dinan stg.3, Alcon bbk, HRE P40
Appreciate 0
      04-02-2011, 02:45 PM   #162
Levi
Brigadier General
Levi's Avatar
Czech_Republic
124
Rep
3,452
Posts

 
Drives: Alfa Romeo
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Prague

iTrader: (0)

There is an explanation to why the MP4-12C has such a high reving turbo engine. It is a 3.798 cc 90 V8, that has a bore x stroke of 93 mm x 69.9 mm. I don't know how is it possble to get such a stroke from the N55.
Appreciate 0
      04-02-2011, 05:20 PM   #163
GregW / Oregon
Commander-In-Chief
United_States
137
Rep
7,647
Posts

 
Drives: 2015 M4 Coupe, 2012 ML350
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Lake Oswego, OR

iTrader: (2)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by Levi View Post
There is an explanation to why the MP4-12C has such a high reving turbo engine. It is a 3.798 cc 90 V8, that has a bore x stroke of 93 mm x 69.9 mm. I don't know how is it possble to get such a stroke from the N55.
True, that was nearly a clean sheet engine, and BMW will not have such latitude for a lower price point unit.
__________________

Greg Lake Oswego, Oregon, USA
2015 M4 Coupe - Silverstone/Sakhir/CF
2012 ML350
Appreciate 0
      04-18-2011, 06:49 PM   #164
kyoo
Private
1
Rep
70
Posts

 
Drives: IX
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: USA

iTrader: (0)

Does seem quite optimistic.. I'm not sure if I'm a fan of this direction BMW is taking with stepwise upgrades in performance up to the M.. its kind of bloating the lineup and making things a little more confusing, not to mention allowing the M3 to go higher and higher in MSRP..

Kind of reminds me of what's going on with the corvette now, or maybe even with the different variants of the 911 (I realize its a different situation since its the same car with different higher performance versions).
I'm just expressing a little concern that one day the only way to get the ultimate m3 will be shelling out like 100k and everyone who could have had the ultimate 3 series will have to get an 335si or ssi or ssiM blah blah blah...

If the M becomes like the ZR1, and everything under it (335i, whatever) become like the Z06, GrandSport, base C6, etc, I don't know if I would be happy getting those versions over the M version.. yet I don't know if I would be able to afford, speculatively, the future M3 - and I also think it could hurt sales of the lineup too.

We all have egos, a lot of us wouldn't be satisfied not having the best 3 series - myself included. I think if I couldnt afford the "best" M3 I'd turn away from the lineup entirely instead of getting the 3 series performance car I could afford.

not sure if I conveyed my thoughts very clearly there
Appreciate 0
      04-18-2011, 09:47 PM   #165
klammer
Brigadier General
41
Rep
3,245
Posts

 
Drives: 11 spc gry m3 e90, 07 X5
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: chicago

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyoo View Post
Does seem quite optimistic.. I'm not sure if I'm a fan of this direction BMW is taking with stepwise upgrades in performance up to the M.. its kind of bloating the lineup and making things a little more confusing, not to mention allowing the M3 to go higher and higher in MSRP..

Kind of reminds me of what's going on with the corvette now, or maybe even with the different variants of the 911 (I realize its a different situation since its the same car with different higher performance versions).
I'm just expressing a little concern that one day the only way to get the ultimate m3 will be shelling out like 100k and everyone who could have had the ultimate 3 series will have to get an 335si or ssi or ssiM blah blah blah...

If the M becomes like the ZR1, and everything under it (335i, whatever) become like the Z06, GrandSport, base C6, etc, I don't know if I would be happy getting those versions over the M version.. yet I don't know if I would be able to afford, speculatively, the future M3 - and I also think it could hurt sales of the lineup too.

We all have egos, a lot of us wouldn't be satisfied not having the best 3 series - myself included. I think if I couldnt afford the "best" M3 I'd turn away from the lineup entirely instead of getting the 3 series performance car I could afford.

not sure if I conveyed my thoughts very clearly there
I got it and would have to agree.
__________________
mods: akra evo, dinan 3.45 diff, ess akra tune, dinan stg.3, Alcon bbk, HRE P40
Appreciate 0
      04-19-2011, 07:07 AM   #166
roastbeef
Captain
roastbeef's Avatar
United_States
13
Rep
880
Posts

 
Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Orange County, CA

iTrader: (0)

what year is the current m3 supposed to halt production, and when does f30 production begin?
Appreciate 0
      04-19-2011, 07:55 AM   #167
mkoesel
Moderator
United_States
184
Rep
13,842
Posts

 
Drives: 2015 SO/CSAT F80 M3
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Canton, MI

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by roastbeef View Post
what year is the current m3 supposed to halt production, and when does f30 production begin?
I would suggest you search the forum. There are - no exaggeration - at least a dozen threads that cover this.
__________________
A gen-u-ine BMW eff-eight-zero with them tandem clutches in the transmission and that dad gum sun roof on the top-a da cawr.
Appreciate 0
      04-19-2011, 01:37 PM   #168
kyoo
Private
1
Rep
70
Posts

 
Drives: IX
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: USA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by klammer View Post
I got it and would have to agree.
yeah - i think pending the msrp of the next m3 i may pose the issue again in a separate thread to see what everone thinks
Appreciate 0
      04-19-2011, 01:53 PM   #169
duk
///M
United_States
42
Rep
2,967
Posts

 
Drives: 2011 AW/FR 6MT E92
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Jose, CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by roastbeef View Post
what year is the current m3 supposed to halt production, and when does f30 production begin?
2012 last year for coupes i would think and f3x m3 will be produced mid 2014
__________________
2011 AW/FR 6MT E92 | Powered by Premier | Alekshop | ESS |
Rok n Peace Clothing: www.roknpeace.com

Appreciate 0
      04-19-2011, 02:07 PM   #170
OC3
Havin' a blast!
OC3's Avatar
United_States
53
Rep
4,819
Posts

 
Drives: 2013 M3 E92 Jerez Blk DCT ZCP
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by swamp2 View Post
Sorry but your skepticism here is not well placed.

The current M3 with competition package (not that this package has any real influence on 0-60) has already achieved a 3.9. Now agreed, that number is a bit of an outlier, but it still made it. The new one will absolutely be sub 4.0 and sub 4.0 won't be such an outlier more of simply a solid run.

Really you don't need to know much more than power and weight to predict performance. As well the tires, chassis and most importantly launch control will all be better in the next gen car.
If this is true, non-ZCP's indeed are lowly Civic's.
__________________

BRP CW13 1:56 | CVR CW 2:01 | CVR CCW 2:02 | ACS 1:53 | WSIR 1:34
2013 E92 M3 Jerez Black DCT ZCP | JRZ RS Pro | Brembo | Endless | Volk TE37 18x10.5 squared | NT01/TD/ContiGrandAm | no other mods, nor weight shavings
Appreciate 0
      01-19-2014, 06:27 PM   #171
hwelvaar
Major
Belgium
25
Rep
1,071
Posts

 
Drives: BMW M135i MT
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Belgium

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrad01 View Post
They are not going to use the N55 (or varient) in the next M3. The design of the N54 and N55 mills doesn't have the tuning and reliability creds they need for a e9x M3 V8 beater.

Pretty sure it will be a 8cyl TT putting out less than the nextgen M5 version.
Still pretty sure ?
Appreciate 0
      01-19-2014, 06:32 PM   #172
hwelvaar
Major
Belgium
25
Rep
1,071
Posts

 
Drives: BMW M135i MT
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Belgium

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by kaykay View Post
Also, I don't see this car having LESS than 480hp. Absolutely NO WAY. HP, Torque, performance, everything will be better. Bottom line.
Yes way...

Funny to check these old comments...
Appreciate 0
      05-12-2014, 02:49 PM   #173
V1.47fan
Powered by Bacon
V1.47fan's Avatar
United_States
45
Rep
1,451
Posts

 
Drives: Bay M Vee
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: NATIONWIDE

iTrader: (0)

All the folks with those crazy 0 to 60 in 3.7 s or less predictions, where are you?

http://f80.bimmerpost.com/forums/sho...d.php?t=984354
Appreciate 0
      05-12-2014, 03:52 PM   #174
paddy335
Major
10
Rep
1,014
Posts

 
Drives: 335i Touring; X5 40d
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New Zealand

iTrader: (0)

Congratulations to swamp on a very good set of predictions made back in 2010

Appreciate 0
      05-12-2014, 04:45 PM   #175
FormulaMMM
Major
FormulaMMM's Avatar
United_States
25
Rep
1,443
Posts

 
Drives: E90 M3
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Midwest

iTrader: (1)

2010 0-200 kph prediction was 13.2 - 13.6. Actual is 13.4. That's pretty ridiculous.
__________________
DCT E90 M3: Akrapovic Evolution, KW Clubsport, Stoptech ST-40 Front + Pagid RS29 | Stock Rear + Stoptech SP, Apex ARC-8 + Hankook Ventus S1 noble2 275/35/18 (street), Apex EC-7 18x10 ET25 + Nitto NT01 275/35/18 (track), tbd...
Past: Velos Designwerks Tune, Megan Racing Catback, Macht Schnell Filter
Appreciate 0
      05-13-2014, 02:40 AM   #176
swamp2
Lieutenant General
swamp2's Avatar
United_States
215
Rep
10,201
Posts

 
Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego, CA USA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by paddy335 View Post
Congratulations to swamp on a very good set of predictions made back in 2010

Thanks! I sure wish some others might learn that science and engineering can be armchair activities but also that they can also be quite powerfully predictive... One of my "missions" here. Cheers.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
2014 bmw m3, 2014 f30 m3, 2014 f32 m3, 2014 m3, 2014 m3 coupe, 2015 bmw m3, 2015 m3, 2015 m3 coup3, bmw 2014 m3, f30 m3, f30 m3 forum, f30 m3 sedan, f32 m3, f32 m3 coup3, f32 m3 forum

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:52 AM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST