|
|
10-25-2010, 10:50 AM | #23 | ||
Colonel
99
Rep 2,000
Posts |
Quote:
You say C & D is "cheating", but they're very up front with how they measure, and that procedure is no more or less viable than anyone else's. What is your personal measurement scheme for measuring 0-60 times? Is it from when you tell the car you want to go via clutch release or brake release? Is it from when the car begins to roll? Is it from when the car has already rolled a foot in order to match drag strip clocks? Would you want to zero the time to standard day weather conditions? No? Yes? Whatever you say is fine by me, but may not match what I may consider to be the "correct" method. So what. It'll almost certainly be one of the viable methods. Quote:
I would tend to agree that an M3 almost certainly cannot consistently match the CTS-V in 0-60 times, but again, so what? Car & Driver got that time using their specific testing methods and reported it. It just happened to be the quickest time they've ever gotten from an M3 in that test. Are you saying they lied? If so, why? And were they lying the last several times they tested an M3 and got differing (slower) results? By the way, there is the possibility that the M3 with launch control and the competition package might actually be able to match the Caddy to that speed, because the Caddy lacks launch control. Finally, and I've mentioned this more than once in the past, who gives a damn? 0-60 isn't a useful measure of anything I know of out here on the mean streets or tracks - mainly because it doesn't tell you who's ahead at 60. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
10-31-2010, 03:39 PM | #24 | |
First Lieutenant
23
Rep 380
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-01-2010, 10:01 AM | #25 |
Major
58
Rep 1,305
Posts |
__________________
2009 Jet Black E92 M3, DCT, Nav, Novillo Leather, PDC, EDC, BBS CHR's 20", Yokohama Advan Sports Tires, Eiback Pro-Kit Springs, Dinan Pullies and Dinan Stage1 software, black grills, black side gills, alcantara shift and ebrake boot.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|