|
|
03-17-2010, 09:47 AM | #45 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
99
Rep 1,575
Posts |
Quote:
Very valid points, besides the comfort. Comfort is not a determining factor for soul of a sports car. If you are taking comfort into consideration for soul... The C63 is a a car with a hell of a lot more soul than any M3 - but we know its not.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-17-2010, 10:42 AM | #46 |
Brigadier General
126
Rep 4,145
Posts |
Another observation: there are many little things that have been improved in the E9x M3s.
o The automatic windshield wiper mode functions a bit better. The E46 would be a little too late swiping or a little too early. The E92 seems to be perfect. o There is not as big a difference from normal to Sport mode for the throttle response. I think the E92 has this implemented better. o DSC is not as noticeable. When the E46 M3 DSC applied the brakes or fiddled with the throttle you could virtually come to a stop. And this is especially at times when you really didn't want to. The E92 M3 DSC seems to be less intrusive. Maybe it acts faster or is just smarter, but it doesn't stop you in order to keep the front and rear wheels from swapping places. o The rev limiter doesn't completely cut the throttle on you in the E92 like it did in the E46. It's a "soft" limiter as opposed to a "hard" limiter. However, this is going by what others have said; I have not experienced this yet in the E92 M3. o Some things that you had to go to the dealer to change -- like whether it takes one or two taps on the key remote to open all doors, DRL on or off, etc. -- you can now change yourself. Pretty cool, since dealers like to charge for this. There's probably many more little things that have been improved that we don't know about. This, of course, should be expected in a new car, but I just wanted to mention it. There's a few things they didn't improve, IMHO. The number one thing is that there is no oil dipstick.
__________________
2017 F80 YMB.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-17-2010, 11:36 AM | #47 | |
Major General
2728
Rep 6,751
Posts |
Quote:
But E46 and E90 differences aside, I am not totally sure either one qualifies as a true sports car. To my eyes, they are more like GT's with sporting intentions, and all the better for it - if I wanted a true sports car, I think I'd get an Elise or something like that. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-17-2010, 04:42 PM | #48 | |
Lieutenant
139
Rep 594
Posts |
Quote:
The only new model that I seen in recent years that weight less then the previous generation was the current 370Z, which actually weights close to the previous generation 350z. Even 911s bump up in weight every successive version. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-17-2010, 05:14 PM | #50 | |
Major General
2728
Rep 6,751
Posts |
Quote:
I was indeed simply pointing out that the E92 is not the worst offender of all the M3 generation changes - the E46 was just as guilty (yet is somehow hailed as this super-lightweight nimble fighting machine). Given that the 3 series grows in size with each generation, even with the adoption of some lighter weight materials and some different construction techniques, I find it very unlikely that new generations will be lighter than the old ones. We should consider ourselves lucky if weight stays the same. As long as the M3 is built off the 3 series platform, I expect that whatever weight trend the 3 series suffers from, the M3 will duplicate. I've heard rumors the F10 M5 will again resort to an aluminum front structure as well as other measures to keep weight in check. I'll believe it when I see it... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-17-2010, 05:37 PM | #51 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
99
Rep 1,575
Posts |
Quote:
not berating him bro, but I honestly dont see the next M3 being 4000 pounds. I really dont. It dosnt make sense. And the one after will be 4200-4300 pounds? No way man. I am a big advocate of looking at the past and questioning the future, but there will be a tipping point. And I believe that tipping point will be on the next M3. I think it will be the same weight, if not lighter than the E9x. I actually thought the E92 would be the tipping point but I was a bit off, I gave them too much credit as far as implementing newer technologies to go lighter. They are fighting an uphill battle with safety regs and luxury demands.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-17-2010, 05:48 PM | #52 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
99
Rep 1,575
Posts |
Quote:
Let me clarify this... The E92 is cool, but the E46 was cooler in its time. I might be over defending the E46 and that might be because I dont believe for a second that its glory was artificial - which is what triggered this convo. Again, theres TONS of cars out there with V8s. How many have high revving I6s??? Thats what made the E46 special and to me, the engine on a car has a lot more to do with a cars "soul" than how granny feels on her way to the market. Just sayin. That high revving Inline 6, the tight/stiff suspension, the gearbox, the steering feel, the sound of the I6 screaming (no engine sounds like that), the raspy exhaust... all this made the E46 more special than the E92. But again, thats just an opinion
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-17-2010, 07:51 PM | #53 | |
Private First Class
4
Rep 116
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-18-2010, 01:17 AM | #55 | |
Lieutenant
50
Rep 574
Posts |
Quote:
But in my defense let me lay out my thinking less emotionally: My opinion is that the soul of BMW has been to build sport sedans or at the most GT cars in the true Grand Touring sense. Cars that you can rack up 100's of miles a day in at high speed, in all conditions, on all roads, in relative comfort (comfort meaning control and physical comfort). Now, again in my opinion, the E46 tried too hard to be a hard edged sports car rather than a true sports sedan in the BMW tradition. Here the logic behind that argument: Suspension: When I owned it in Chicago I felt the suspension was too harsh for the roads there. It was almost grit your teeth harsh going over the frost heaves. Now, granted the car was new and it mellowed overtime and was less of an issue out west. But, despite the harsh suspension, the handling, while great, is not comparable to the E92 with EDC- which is much smoother with better handling. Acoustics: I also loved the inline six, yet why was there a rasp? This is again just to make the car acoustically 'rougher' or the driving experience more raw. Nobody can tell me the rasp was not intentional. BMW spends 1000's of hours working on the acoustics for all their cars. Hood Bulge: Total marketing, like they wanted to put a V8 in it eventually. The bulge was even called a 'power dome'. Totally unnecessary. Engine Redline: Now I know from my own seat of the pants after 5 years of driving it, the stock E46 M3 did not produce more power above 7800 RPM or so. Yet we had a redline at 8200 RPM. Why? The M roadster and coupe both had the same engine with a much lower redline. Mike Miller from Bimmer Magazine and Roundel has stated his opinion the redline is total marketing. I agree. Let's not even start talking about the two bottom end recalls done on mine. Refinement: For what it is worth all my M3's have been pretty stripped down. My present car has no I-Drive, and my E36 and E46 had manual seats with no sunroof. So, I like comfort but not at the expense of weight. Unfortunately my present M3 has a sunroof, but I bought it used. So no, I don't value comfort over performance. I value refinement with performance. This is my final argument: The E46 M3 designers deliberately chose to make the car less refined to give it a more sporting appeal. So those are my arguments. Could BMW have made a smoother more refined, 'raspless' M3 that was just as fast as the E46 M3, without the hood bulge and just as much power with a lower redline? Of course. And, to my argument, that would be more of what BMW is about from the 2002 tii to the present E92 M3. And who cares about grandma? I don't let her near my car!! (EDIT: Of course I don't mean make lower revving engines! High revving engines are also a BMW tradition- just set the redline based on Engineering, not Marketing).
__________________
'08 E92 IB, Gone '10 GT3 now in my garage! '10 X5 3.5D '12 E91 Xi Wagon MT sports package |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-18-2010, 01:40 AM | #56 |
Banned
88
Rep 1,680
Posts |
LOL@PPLs opinions.
Simply put, which would you drive daily, and which would you rather drive on the track? E92 for daily and E46 for the track. That should speak for 'soul', rather than excuses of why BMW did this and that. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-18-2010, 01:47 AM | #57 | |
Major
235
Rep 1,125
Posts |
Quote:
Thank you so much You really made me when I read that. I do love these discussions though. Very insightful to read everyone's opinion.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-18-2010, 09:26 AM | #58 | |
Major General
2728
Rep 6,751
Posts |
Quote:
Neither is a purpose built track weapon, they are meant as daily drivers, street machines par excellence - that will also be fun on a track. So if I owned an E46 that's what I would track and have balls of fun in the process. Heck, I'd even track the X3 if they'd let me... But if I showed up at the track I could chose between them, then I'd pick the keys to the E90 every time. You really have to experience what it can do when driven full out...
__________________
2018 F80 Santorini 2019 Z4 3.0i 2022 X2 M35i |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-18-2010, 09:55 AM | #59 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
99
Rep 1,575
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-18-2010, 11:19 AM | #60 | |
Lieutenant
50
Rep 574
Posts |
Quote:
We have a difference of opinion, yet we are serial M3 owners and both own the current model, so don't throw me completely under the bus just yet. This was a question of soul so that is totally subjective. Surprise! you have a different answer to the same question. Enjoy your ride(s)!
__________________
'08 E92 IB, Gone '10 GT3 now in my garage! '10 X5 3.5D '12 E91 Xi Wagon MT sports package |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-18-2010, 11:47 AM | #61 |
Second Lieutenant
17
Rep 239
Posts |
I just vote with my wallet
None of these things are sports cars.
Sporty, yes. I test drove the e46 when it came out and elected to keep my current car and modify it. I bought an e92. Says it all, doesn't it? |
Appreciate
0
|
03-18-2010, 12:28 PM | #62 | |
Captain
74
Rep 757
Posts |
Quote:
You are the reason the real enthusiasts are frustrated with BMW. You don't get it and you never will. That's okay.. but don't buy an M car and gripe about it's sporting quirks. I love them, and I wish the e9X had more of them. M cars SHOULD be raw to the point of almost being full bore sports cars yet retain enough lux so you never forget your in a BMW. It's a fantastic balance BMW has done for years. The e46 had that in spades. So does the 9X but in a different way. Raspy exhaust? Really? You should be driving a Panamera.
__________________
Straight roads are for fast cars. Curvy roads are for fast drivers.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-18-2010, 10:51 PM | #63 | |
Lieutenant
50
Rep 574
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
'08 E92 IB, Gone '10 GT3 now in my garage! '10 X5 3.5D '12 E91 Xi Wagon MT sports package |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-19-2010, 07:27 AM | #64 | |
Captain
74
Rep 757
Posts |
Quote:
My point was simple; The M3 is a balanced car between a real deal high performance sports car and a luxury car. If it was any more one trait in either direction it wouldn't be so special. I get flamed by some of my friends, and they are just trying to rattle my cage but their points hold water. They tell me how BMW's are for poser, overpaid image whores. Now, obviously I know that's not the case for everyone, but many BMW owners I know buy these cars as a statement. They go to the dealer and figure out what car holds the most respect, prestige and sometimes highest price tag.. and buy it. Many times it being an M car. Then, they complain about them because of a loud exhaust, harsh ride etc. This eventually gets to BMW's top brass and they soften the cars up because.. well, they want to make money. Now, guys like me live for driving. Every single time I step into a car.. doesn't have to be a sports car.. I am in love with apexing every turn, practicing smooth transitions, heel and toeing etc. Guys like me buy the M3 because it's enough of a sports car to excite the senses.. the drivers feedback is exceptional and yet it's still enough lux to be comfortable for day to day commutes. As a driving nut and borderline race car driver.. which I intend on doing once I retire.. I wouldn't mind a little more harshness. The e46 was more inline with that idea. I love the hood bulge and side gills and loud raspy exhaust. It's all part of the sensory excitement. I realize I did take a shot at you with the Panamera comment. Perhaps that was immature. However, if you honestly feel the way you do about the M3, why don't you get something that's a little more lux focused but still performs. Leave the M cars to the right buyer. We'll talk BMW into making them harsher. Probably not but one can dream! No hard feelings.
__________________
Straight roads are for fast cars. Curvy roads are for fast drivers.
Last edited by Stunnerable; 03-19-2010 at 11:52 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-19-2010, 03:43 PM | #65 |
MacroRisk
109
Rep 2,523
Posts |
This is my first M-car. But I have driven a few others, including the M3 E46.
Personally, I like the combination of performance and refinement of the E9X M3. But I'm demographicallly past the 'I want the M3 to be as hard core as possible" stage. I drive on country roads a fair but and doing about 25k / miles a year I do want a modicum of comfort in my GT. The e46 was more overtly sporting & I do subscribe to the view than in its era it was a more significant car, relatively, than the E9x M3 (which has a peer group now crowded w/ C61, Rs4, IS-F and soon the RS5). I still wish BMW would offer a CS version for the make-it-hard-core set. I suspect, given the Efficient Dynamics focus by BMW mgmt that the next M3 will be lighter & as well as more economical. Big reason, surely, for going back to an I6/V6 + FI & DI.
__________________
Just thinking of something not so witty ///M3 E92 '09 Jerez Black | 6MT | Ext Fox Red | Tech | Prem | 19s |Heated Seats | iPod |Smartphone | Euro Deliv June 09 Sold: 540iT / 530i / 323i |
Appreciate
0
|
03-19-2010, 04:42 PM | #66 | |
Colonel
699
Rep 2,548
Posts
Drives: '08 135i, '88 325is
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Denver, CO
|
Quote:
__________________
Delivered in Munich, broken in on the Nurburgring.
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|