BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > E90/E92 M3 Technical Topics > Suspension | Brakes | Chassis
 
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      08-12-2013, 03:22 PM   #1
哇靠M3
Captain
Taiwan
84
Rep
781
Posts

Drives: e92 M3
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: 加州到台北

iTrader: (5)

Garage List
2009 E92 M3  [9.00]
dilemma on getting sleeve kit, some inputs?

Just wanted to ask for some opinions as I always find this forum to be helpful.

Car Specs:
  • 2009 M3 w/ around 30k miles on OEM suspensions (zero tweaks) - 65% highway driving
  • currently on 18x9.5 ET20 / 18x10.5 ET25 - 265/35/18 Front & 285/35/18
  • driving mostly between San Francisco and San Mateo area.

So here's the dilemma. I've been reading that because Kw Sleeve are only spring + bump stop setup, the OEM shocks will soon give out because of the spring rates. With 30k miles on the car already... Is it a bad thing to consider a Sleeve setup as the shocks were aged already. Does that mean that my OEM shocks will give out even sooner when I put the sleeve setup on my car?

What are your thoughts?

Should, I pass on the sleeve and go V3 (i'm not a track junkie)? Thanks for your help.

Last edited by 哇靠M3; 08-12-2013 at 03:34 PM..
Appreciate 0
      08-12-2013, 04:48 PM   #2
Denk
Brigadier General
Denk's Avatar
1006
Rep
3,341
Posts

Drives: 2021 X5M
Join Date: May 2011
Location: PNW

iTrader: (2)

I'd stay stock.
Appreciate 0
      08-12-2013, 04:52 PM   #3
mkPOTO
Mr. Nice Says Hello
mkPOTO's Avatar
635
Rep
16,662
Posts

Drives: BMW M3 | X5 xdrive 35i MSport
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: USA

iTrader: (25)

Garage List
really what you arre wanting to do with the car. I use my car for track time and just spirited driving. I am running KW V3, and will be running something more track dedicated. If you are looking to just go low, might try some springs, but if your looking for low then go with a coilovers setup, but I think with your miles you will be fine with the sleeves
Appreciate 0
      08-13-2013, 07:44 AM   #4
Black Gold
Major General
590
Rep
5,396
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Texas

iTrader: (15)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 哇靠M3 View Post
Just wanted to ask for some opinions as I always find this forum to be helpful.

Car Specs:
  • 2009 M3 w/ around 30k miles on OEM suspensions (zero tweaks) - 65% highway driving
  • currently on 18x9.5 ET20 / 18x10.5 ET25 - 265/35/18 Front & 285/35/18
  • driving mostly between San Francisco and San Mateo area.

So here's the dilemma. I've been reading that because Kw Sleeve are only spring + bump stop setup, the OEM shocks will soon give out because of the spring rates. With 30k miles on the car already... Is it a bad thing to consider a Sleeve setup as the shocks were aged already. Does that mean that my OEM shocks will give out even sooner when I put the sleeve setup on my car?

What are your thoughts?

Should, I pass on the sleeve and go V3 (i'm not a track junkie)? Thanks for your help.
the problems with the sleeve kit have far less to do with damaging your shocks and far more to do with the fact that it is a half assed solution to dropping your car. it is basically all about aesthetics (which is fine), but will cause your car to handle and ride worse. every wrench turn lower that you make will cause these problems to get worse.

if you want the car to ride well and handle well going lower, you have two options. 1 would be a dinan setup, which is OK because it doesn't drop the car much, and it does allow for more damper travel before hitting the bump stops which helps. 2 would be a high end coilover kit with high level dampers, akin to an ohlins RT setup which costs 3k.

outside of those options, I wouldn't recommend anything else, and would stay stock.
Appreciate 0
      08-13-2013, 09:12 AM   #5
vastano
Captain
103
Rep
893
Posts

Drives: F15 X5
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Atlanta, GA

iTrader: (5)

Anytime you lower your car, you will lessen the life of your shocks. Instead of spending more than you have to on the KW sleeve kit, I'd recommend Swift springs. If you're not going to be tracking (and even if you were) they give the car a nice drop and handle great. Also, the ride is very much stock like. All in all, i'm VERY happy with my Swift purchase.

IMO, there's no reason to get a full coilover kit unless youre gonna be tracking your car.
Appreciate 0
      08-13-2013, 10:02 AM   #6
tlrid3r
just another M3
tlrid3r's Avatar
United_States
514
Rep
1,150
Posts

Drives: e92 M3
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, ca

iTrader: (6)

I installed a sleeve kit several months ago. Its basically stock feeling. with the exception you dont slam the car. I lowered mine about 1" all around and drives great. I opted out to using e36 m3 pump stops in the front with milled top mount. but if you use the KW bump stop you will be fine, also I used dinan rear shock mount. The key is, its not meant to be slammed. I drive in SF several time no issues.
Appreciate 0
      08-13-2013, 10:31 AM   #7
pbonsalb
Lieutenant General
5211
Rep
10,584
Posts

Drives: 18 F90 M5, 99 E36 M3 Turbo
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: New England

iTrader: (4)

I would not lower much or go much stiffer on stock shocks. They are not shortened internally, so you lose travel and they are not valved for stiffer springs. I run the regular H&R Springs. Slight drop, which is fine. No need for sleeves, which are more expensive. If I was going to spend more, I'd go for coilovers. A few companies make them if you decide to go that way because you want significant lowering or a much stiffer suspension.
Appreciate 0
      08-13-2013, 12:18 PM   #8
哇靠M3
Captain
Taiwan
84
Rep
781
Posts

Drives: e92 M3
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: 加州到台北

iTrader: (5)

Garage List
2009 E92 M3  [9.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by vastano View Post
Anytime you lower your car, you will lessen the life of your shocks. Instead of spending more than you have to on the KW sleeve kit, I'd recommend Swift springs. If you're not going to be tracking (and even if you were) they give the car a nice drop and handle great. Also, the ride is very much stock like. All in all, i'm VERY happy with my Swift purchase.

IMO, there's no reason to get a full coilover kit unless youre gonna be tracking your car.
Can you comment a little more about your Swift Spring experience?
Did you use E36 bump stops? Also how does each EDC mode feel compared to stock?
Appreciate 0
      08-13-2013, 12:26 PM   #9
italyix
Captain
italyix's Avatar
United_States
141
Rep
979
Posts

Drives: '08 E90 M3
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Bay Area

iTrader: (5)

Quote:
Originally Posted by tlrid3r View Post
I installed a sleeve kit several months ago. Its basically stock feeling. with the exception you dont slam the car. I lowered mine about 1" all around and drives great. I opted out to using e36 m3 pump stops in the front with milled top mount. but if you use the KW bump stop you will be fine, also I used dinan rear shock mount. The key is, its not meant to be slammed. I drive in SF several time no issues.
I have this same set up, with the exception of no Dinan rear mounts.

MRF shaved upper support guides and E36 bumpstops to replace the KW ones. Been running this for the past 1.5 years, daily driven car and I have ZERO complaints. Far cheaper option then running coilovers at this point. I installed the springs at 54k miles and put 12k on them so far (I dont drive alot, i know).

I went this route as 1. I am still CPO and 2. I did not want to drop the cash on coilovers yet. Once warranty is up (although it does not cover suspension) and the shocks eventually blow, i will get coilovers.
__________________
Mods: too many the list wont fit in the sig page. PM me
Tesla Referral code: http://ts.la/juliana77782
Appreciate 0
      08-13-2013, 12:31 PM   #10
tlrid3r
just another M3
tlrid3r's Avatar
United_States
514
Rep
1,150
Posts

Drives: e92 M3
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Jose, ca

iTrader: (6)

Quote:
Originally Posted by italyix View Post
I have this same set up, with the exception of no Dinan rear mounts.

MRF shaved upper support guides and E36 bumpstops to replace the KW ones. Been running this for the past 1.5 years, daily driven car and I have ZERO complaints. Far cheaper option then running coilovers at this point. I installed the springs at 54k miles and put 12k on them so far (I dont drive alot, i know).

I went this route as 1. I am still CPO and 2. I did not want to drop the cash on coilovers yet. Once warranty is up (although it does not cover suspension) and the shocks eventually blow, i will get coilovers.

I just didn't want to lose EDC. same thing here once they blow, coiloves for me. the ride now is too soft but happy with it.
Appreciate 0
      08-13-2013, 03:50 PM   #11
italyix
Captain
italyix's Avatar
United_States
141
Rep
979
Posts

Drives: '08 E90 M3
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Bay Area

iTrader: (5)

You wont lose ECD, I have it and the springs make it more responsive. However, expect a more pronounced bouncier ride. High Speed bump/rebound with KW springs and EDC shocks is not the greatest.
__________________
Mods: too many the list wont fit in the sig page. PM me
Tesla Referral code: http://ts.la/juliana77782
Appreciate 0
      08-13-2013, 04:35 PM   #12
radiantm3
Apex Everything!
radiantm3's Avatar
United_States
976
Rep
4,378
Posts

Drives: 2007 Honda S2000, 2017 GT350
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cedar Park, TX

iTrader: (6)

Garage List
2011 E92 M3  [9.35]
2014 BMW i3  [10.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by vastano View Post
IMO, there's no reason to get a full coilover kit unless youre gonna be tracking your car.
I wouldn't necessarily say that. My KW V3's and now Ohlin RT's both provide a much more supple ride quality than stock ever did and I had EDC. Quality shocks will do a better job absorbing bumps while still being firm. One thing I noticed when going from my stock EDC setup to V3's was how my car would feel like it was in sport mode, but absorbed bumps in the road so much better than stock. Tires would stay planted to the ground giving traction on uneven roads instead of bouncing around.
__________________
2011 E92 M3(Sold). 2007 Honda S2000 (Track Car). 2016 Cayman GT4 (Sold). 2017 Shelby GT350 (AKA Crowd Killer).

My pet project: https://stickershift.com
Appreciate 0
      08-19-2013, 05:17 PM   #13
pkimM3r
Banned
pkimM3r's Avatar
205
Rep
7,298
Posts

Drives: m3 saloon in granny mode.
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lost angeles

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by radiantm3 View Post
I wouldn't necessarily say that. My KW V3's and now Ohlin RT's both provide a much more supple ride quality than stock ever did and I had EDC. Quality shocks will do a better job absorbing bumps while still being firm. One thing I noticed when going from my stock EDC setup to V3's was how my car would feel like it was in sport mode, but absorbed bumps in the road so much better than stock. Tires would stay planted to the ground giving traction on uneven roads instead of bouncing around.
Are the RT the road and track version? I was under the impression that they were really setup for the street but if its good enough for you on your car, it should be good enough for me right?
Appreciate 0
      08-19-2013, 05:19 PM   #14
哇靠M3
Captain
Taiwan
84
Rep
781
Posts

Drives: e92 M3
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: 加州到台北

iTrader: (5)

Garage List
2009 E92 M3  [9.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by pkim1079 View Post
Are the RT the road and track version? I was under the impression that they were really setup for the street but if its good enough for you on your car, it should be good enough for me right?
Biggest problem i see with the RT (Road & track) Ohlins is the fact that they need to be serviced every 15k miles.
Appreciate 0
      08-19-2013, 05:24 PM   #15
1MOREMOD
-
1MOREMOD's Avatar
United_States
11817
Rep
23,187
Posts

Drives: Race car->
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: check your mirrors

iTrader: (5)

Quote:
Originally Posted by radiantm3 View Post
I wouldn't necessarily say that. My KW V3's and now Ohlin RT's both provide a much more supple ride quality than stock ever did and I had EDC. Quality shocks will do a better job absorbing bumps while still being firm. One thing I noticed when going from my stock EDC setup to V3's was how my car would feel like it was in sport mode, but absorbed bumps in the road so much better than stock. Tires would stay planted to the ground giving traction on uneven roads instead of bouncing around.
I think that has to do with spring rate also. Once you get to a higher rate bumps get choppy again unless you are damping way down on the street.
Appreciate 0
      08-19-2013, 05:27 PM   #16
radiantm3
Apex Everything!
radiantm3's Avatar
United_States
976
Rep
4,378
Posts

Drives: 2007 Honda S2000, 2017 GT350
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Cedar Park, TX

iTrader: (6)

Garage List
2011 E92 M3  [9.35]
2014 BMW i3  [10.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by pkim1079 View Post
Are the RT the road and track version? I was under the impression that they were really setup for the street but if its good enough for you on your car, it should be good enough for me right?
Unfortunately, I've never driven a car on the track with properly set up track suspension. I'm still trying to learn about suspension and how all the adjustments affect the car on and off the track. The RT's single adjustment makes it much easier for me to play around with and see how it affects my car. The thing is, you can spend 8 grand on suspension, but its useless if you don't know how to set it up correctly for the car and your driving style.

I'm the type that learns best from my own experiences and mistakes. Which is why I had a supercharger on my car for 10k miles and now its gone. I find the Ohlin RT's to be much better than stock and my V3's, but I'm still trying to optimize the setup for the track. I think my issue at this point is not enough camber in the rear. I've had instructors ride with me and watch me from the flag stations and say I'm just not putting power down out of the corners well enough and its because I have no grip powering out. My rear tires are all worn on the outside so that seems to be the case.

Sorry for the long reply. My point is, I like the Ohlins a lot on and off the track, but I definitely don't have things dialed in quite yet. Setting up suspension properly is hard.
__________________
2011 E92 M3(Sold). 2007 Honda S2000 (Track Car). 2016 Cayman GT4 (Sold). 2017 Shelby GT350 (AKA Crowd Killer).

My pet project: https://stickershift.com
Appreciate 0
      08-19-2013, 05:31 PM   #17
pkimM3r
Banned
pkimM3r's Avatar
205
Rep
7,298
Posts

Drives: m3 saloon in granny mode.
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lost angeles

iTrader: (0)

Im planning on trying to learn on stock suspension and then moving to kw cs. But ive also been told kw3 with camber plates and linear springs are good enough. But at that point isnt it the same price as clubsports?

Edit: warranty is advantageous on the kw3 setup.
Appreciate 0
      08-19-2013, 05:35 PM   #18
1MOREMOD
-
1MOREMOD's Avatar
United_States
11817
Rep
23,187
Posts

Drives: Race car->
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: check your mirrors

iTrader: (5)

Singles like ohlins are fairly easy to set up. I have mine dialed in for the 2 tracks I use for the most part. I already wish I had doubles so I could adjust low speed compression as well. If you really get into it though you would need varied spring rates for each track and possibly alignment as well.
Appreciate 0
      08-19-2013, 06:05 PM   #19
Z K
Major General
Z K's Avatar
1887
Rep
5,506
Posts

Drives: E90 M3, G20 M340i
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Francisco

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by 哇靠M3 View Post

So here's the dilemma. I've been reading that because Kw Sleeve are only spring + bump stop setup, the OEM shocks will soon give out because of the spring rates. With 30k miles on the car already... Is it a bad thing to consider a Sleeve setup as the shocks were aged already. Does that mean that my OEM shocks will give out even sooner when I put the sleeve setup on my car?

What are your thoughts?

Should, I pass on the sleeve and go V3 (i'm not a track junkie)? Thanks for your help.
I had the KW Sleeve kit and then went with the V3. The V3 is a lot better. The sleeve kit is a band-aid just providing a lower ride height. The stock shocks are terrible in terms of rebound no matter what setting you put it on. You end up with a underdamped and bouncy ride. And as you mentioned, it accelerates shock wear. Any lowering on stock shocks will.

If you get the KW sleeve, you can put it on the highest setting which is what I used. It'll lower the car about 1 inch in front and 0.5 inch in back. But if that's the case, you may as well get the Swift springs which cost less and give you the same lowering. Swift was not available when I got the KW Sleeve kit.

If you can spend the money get the KW V3. You can tune the suspension to ride comfortably if you want and you get quality shocks and matched springs with it. Any kind of lowering springs on stock shocks is not a balanced setup.
__________________
Auto Detailing Enthusiast!
Appreciate 0
      08-19-2013, 07:05 PM   #20
Denk
Brigadier General
Denk's Avatar
1006
Rep
3,341
Posts

Drives: 2021 X5M
Join Date: May 2011
Location: PNW

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Z K View Post
I had the KW Sleeve kit and then went with the V3. The V3 is a lot better. The sleeve kit is a band-aid just providing a lower ride height. The stock shocks are terrible in terms of rebound no matter what setting you put it on. You end up with a underdamped and bouncy ride. And as you mentioned, it accelerates shock wear. Any lowering on stock shocks will.

If you get the KW sleeve, you can put it on the highest setting which is what I used. It'll lower the car about 1 inch in front and 0.5 inch in back. But if that's the case, you may as well get the Swift springs which cost less and give you the same lowering. Swift was not available when I got the KW Sleeve kit.

If you can spend the money get the KW V3. You can tune the suspension to ride comfortably if you want and you get quality shocks and matched springs with it. Any kind of lowering springs on stock shocks is not a balanced setup.
After years of playing with aftermarket springs, I feel that stock is best. If you're gap obsessed, I'd go the coilover route...especially for serious tracking.
Appreciate 0
      08-19-2013, 07:57 PM   #21
bigjae1976
Major General
bigjae1976's Avatar
1570
Rep
8,075
Posts

Drives: 11 E90 M3 Individual
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston, TX

iTrader: (22)

Garage List
2004 BMW M3  [4.50]
2011 BMW E90 M3  [5.25]
2013 BMW 328i  [5.00]
A sleeve over kit is pointless as long as you don't fall for the coilover is better marketing pitch. The main advantage of a coilover is to provide height adjustability at each corner to optimize the weight distribution of the car on the suspension.

So if you are retaining EDC I would bet that your car has most of its interior. If it has most of its interior then you do not need height adjustability.
__________________
2018 F30 320iX Melbourne Red
2011 E90 M3 Monte Carlo Blue
2004 E46 M3 Imola Red
2000 E36/7 Z3 Steel Blue
Appreciate 0
      08-20-2013, 01:12 PM   #22
tdott
Brigadier General
3938
Rep
3,980
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: South FL / 6ix

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigjae1976 View Post
So if you are retaining EDC I would bet that your car has most of its interior. If it has most of its interior then you do not need height adjustability.
No body neeeds height adjustability, they just want it
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:54 PM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST