|
|
04-25-2008, 10:15 AM | #1 |
Captain
68
Rep 706
Posts |
VIDEO: WebRidesTV pits IS-F against RS4
|
04-26-2008, 10:04 PM | #2 |
//Mdicted
347
Rep 9,988
Posts
Drives: a Cop Magnet
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 495 Ring
iTrader: (18)
Garage List 2009 e92 M3 DCT CF ... [10.00]
2015 S-Works Roubaix [0.00] 2013 Trek Madone 5.9 [9.50] 2012 Scott - CR1-Pro [10.00] 2008 e92 M3 6MT (Up ... [10.00] 2002 e46 M3 Cabriol ... [7.00] 2006 e90-325i (DD) [7.00] 2002 e39 M5 (retired) [9.50] |
nice, thks for sharing. sayM3 wouldnt want to see this
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-26-2008, 10:07 PM | #3 |
//Mdicted
347
Rep 9,988
Posts
Drives: a Cop Magnet
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 495 Ring
iTrader: (18)
Garage List 2009 e92 M3 DCT CF ... [10.00]
2015 S-Works Roubaix [0.00] 2013 Trek Madone 5.9 [9.50] 2012 Scott - CR1-Pro [10.00] 2008 e92 M3 6MT (Up ... [10.00] 2002 e46 M3 Cabriol ... [7.00] 2006 e90-325i (DD) [7.00] 2002 e39 M5 (retired) [9.50] |
Hans should have seen this much earlier
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-26-2008, 11:46 PM | #4 |
Banned
4143
Rep 6,926
Posts |
Why does it seem like an advertisement?
Not to metion the IS-F has been last place in every major comparison test. http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do...ticleId=123158 RS4 - First place IS-F - Last Place Motor Trend, Road & Track, Car & Driver: all had the IS-F in last place. In the Motor Trend test the IS-F was 4.4 seconds slower a lap than the M3 sedan. The IS-F got flat out MURDERED! |
Appreciate
0
|
04-30-2008, 07:56 AM | #5 | |
Registered
0
Rep 2
Posts |
Quote:
hi. get over it. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-30-2008, 08:40 PM | #6 |
Major
122
Rep 1,401
Posts
Drives: 2003 HPF 2.5, 2008 M3 (Sold)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pearl District, OR
|
No doubt I'd take the RS4 over the ISF, beautiful car with the same engine as the R8.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|