|
|
08-15-2009, 05:03 PM | #1 |
8 tracks of madness
62
Rep 2,735
Posts |
E93+DCT=Dog???
I finally got to test drive an M3 today and they only had a DCT so I took that out and holy jeebus was I disappointed. The car would simply not get out of it's own way I currently drive a GTI and with the APR flash I'm making 265HP/303Lb-ft and with it being a lot lighter than the M3 I knew it would be close but the M3 just felt like a dog. No matter what mode I was in, if the power button was pressed, it just never pressed me back into my seat like my GTI does and that disappointed the hell out of me. I still want to drive a manual M3 and hopefully it's better. If the manual disappoints as well I may just go with a 550i or an X5 diesel.
Thoughts? Im really hoping the manual is that much better. Last edited by quality_sound; 08-16-2009 at 06:09 AM.. |
08-15-2009, 05:10 PM | #2 |
Major General
1118
Rep 8,017
Posts |
That's the turbo effect in action. I agree that the M3 doesn't feel overly quick, but put it up against your GTi and watch it drift off into the distance.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-15-2009, 05:20 PM | #3 | |
Automotive Industry Insider
462
Rep 1,948
Posts |
Quote:
Yes, the vert is a much heavier car than your GTI, so I can see how you would be disappointed. But, it's not really fair to compare those two cars. The E93 vert DCT performance vs. the E92 DCT coupe for example would be much closer.
__________________
The best is yet to come...
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-15-2009, 05:25 PM | #4 | |
Captain
51
Rep 965
Posts |
Quote:
In Auto "D" mode the DCT starts the car out in 2nd gear, but in manual mode you are in 1st gear. Recommend now doing a comparison drive
__________________
2009 AW M3 E93 - Black Novillo|DCT|ZTP|ZPP|752 Enh Audio|4UT|Heated Seats|6FL|6NF| For jpg's: http://www.m3post.com/forums/showthr...=186382&page=4 Traded: 2007 335i E93 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-15-2009, 05:26 PM | #5 |
8 tracks of madness
62
Rep 2,735
Posts |
I don't have ANY intention of buying a DCT I just want to see if the manual M3 has more giddy-up. I know it's not a fair comparison but it's what I have against what I'm going into.
footie - It's not the turbo effect, the E93 DCT just wouldn't get going. It took forever and a day to get up to speed. I guarantee you if I took out my GTI and that particular M3 out my GTI would walk that M3. I'm not saying I'd take, all, or even most M3s but the one I drove was a dog. The dealer is getting E90 and E92 testers sometime Monday, unfortunately both DCTs as well, but I'm going to give them a run for shits and giggles since I'll be there driving the 550 and X5 anyway. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-15-2009, 05:29 PM | #6 | |
8 tracks of madness
62
Rep 2,735
Posts |
Quote:
I will be going back Monday so I'll take out the E90 and E92 they have coming in and report back with the updates. I really wish they'd get a 6MT in. I HATE buying a car without driving one first. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-15-2009, 05:53 PM | #7 |
Major General
7334
Rep 7,298
Posts |
You have to get into the upper rev range. It won't feel fast probably anyway. Feeling is different than reality, I have been in some slow cars with turbos that feel much faster than you would think.
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-15-2009, 05:59 PM | #8 |
Major
62
Rep 1,211
Posts |
If you were looking for fast acceleration, why did you bother driving a Vert in the first place?? Are you not aware that it is close to 500 lbs heavier than the coupe/sedans??? It is barely quicker than a E46 M3 or 335 by a small margin.
Unfortunately, weight on the Vert FTL!!!! It is simple physics. It is a GT cruiser with open air experience costing some performance. Go try a coupe or a sedan, they both weigh 3600 lbs. Drive a 6 speed manual and if you know how to get the most with 6 speed, anyone of these should blow you away with the acceleration. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-15-2009, 10:09 PM | #9 |
Captain
51
Rep 965
Posts |
Sounds like the dealer may not have installed the latest PROGMAN version yet
__________________
2009 AW M3 E93 - Black Novillo|DCT|ZTP|ZPP|752 Enh Audio|4UT|Heated Seats|6FL|6NF| For jpg's: http://www.m3post.com/forums/showthr...=186382&page=4 Traded: 2007 335i E93 |
Appreciate
0
|
08-15-2009, 11:47 PM | #11 | |
Lieutenant
148
Rep 598
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2006 M3 ZHP in IB (Crashed) | 2005 M3 ZHP in IB (Sold) 2004 M3 in IR - Current 2018 330ix Wagon - Current 2017 328d Wagon - Current |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2009, 02:47 AM | #12 | |
Commander-in-Chief
24
Rep 142
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
08 JB M3 | 6sp| S/C'd and lots of mods |
2013 MCB M5 | Executive and Driver Package | 20" M rims | B&O System | Planning an exhaust setup 2013 Blk Sapphire M6 | Executive and Driver Package | 20" M rims | B&O System | Planning an exhaust setup |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2009, 03:00 AM | #13 |
Major
195
Rep 1,275
Posts |
Shopping a M3 Vert vs an X5...something I am misssing here? A little different in vehicle type.
We have the vert with a manual as we wanted a vert. We did not going shopping for anything else, but did initially intend to get a 335. I do not street race and most likely will track miminally (should take it the 'Ring while I am in Germany as it would be shame to miss the opportunity). The advantage of open motoring was worth the compromise in performance for us. Then again, it will own most of the locally driven diesels that the Germans embrace.
__________________
2022 M4 Competition ConvertibleDravit / Tartufo Full / Carbon Fiber Exterior...loaded
2020 X5:MW/Coffee Extended Merino, M Sport, B&W....loaded 2007 X3: Sapphire Black / Black loaded 6 speed Gone: M3 E93 Silverstone II over Bamboo |
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2009, 03:05 AM | #14 | ||||
8 tracks of madness
62
Rep 2,735
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
What I'm thnking is itwas mostly the weight and me not getting on it too hard that were the main issues. I'll hammer on the next one and report back Monday evening (it'll be Monday morning for you guys). Thanks guys! |
||||
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2009, 04:43 AM | #15 | |
8 tracks of madness
62
Rep 2,735
Posts |
[QUOTE=osteome;5705847]Shopping a M3 Vert vs an X5...something I am misssing here? A little different in vehicle type. [\quote]
The X5 is for my wife. I'm looking at the M3 and 550i. Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2009, 05:40 AM | #16 |
Captain
50
Rep 780
Posts |
If you want an M3 for performance, don't get the convertible, get the sedan or coupe. The vert really has too much weight (an extra 250kgs) and the flat torque curve of the V8 engine is much better suited to a lighter car. Only get the vert if you really must have an open top...
You test drove the best transmission in terms of performance, the manual has taller gearing from 3rd gear onwards so it will feel even slower... And you really need to rev the engine to maximise the performance, this car is fast in gear from 80-160km/h but not so fast compared to others like the C63 from 80-120km/h... |
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2009, 06:17 AM | #17 |
8 tracks of madness
62
Rep 2,735
Posts |
I haven't searched yet so I'm sure I'm gonna get hammered for asking but where can I find some dyno charts?
You say the manual has shorter gearing in first and second so that might me best for me. I don't really drive fast, i just like to get up to Autobahn speed (130KPH) quickly. I usually won't spend any time over 160KPH. I'm thinking the manual might be mote in line with that driving style. I will also make a trip or two to The Ring but that'll be the extent of my track time most likely. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2009, 06:50 AM | #19 |
8 tracks of madness
62
Rep 2,735
Posts |
Oh for fuck's sake. Read before you post. The X5 is for my wife and the M WAS floored I just didn't run it redline. I'm going to try that Monday in an E90 and see how it goes. Sheesh...
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2009, 07:00 AM | #20 | |
Colonel
310
Rep 2,189
Posts |
Quote:
Your GTI is probably as fast or faster than an M3 Convertible at lower speeds given its weight... It didn't help that you were missing ~100hp by not taking it to redline. Find a broken in sedan or coupe with over 2,000 km. Then you can get a real impression of how fast the car is... it's not amazing but it is quite adequate and a ton of fun to drive. The high-rev V8 is awesome. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2009, 07:35 AM | #21 |
8 tracks of madness
62
Rep 2,735
Posts |
I didn't even think to check the mileage but I'm thinking since it's a tester for military sales that it is pretty well broken in.
Thanks for the info though. I didn't realize all the power was up top. I figured since it was a V8 that it would have more oomph down low. I will say that it was a GREAT drive anyway. Everything felt very solid and the suspension and grip are AMAZING. |
Appreciate
0
|
08-16-2009, 08:33 AM | #22 |
Moderator
7515
Rep 19,368
Posts |
As others have said the M3 cab has a big weight penalty. After driving the E90 M3s (not to mention M5s and M6s) at the M school, I did notice a small difference in acceleration when getting back into my M3. But it is not as dramatic as one might guess.
I suspect you are mainly feeling the difference in power curve between a small displacement motor with big boost and high revving naturally aspirated V8. Plus, you didn't get to redline the car which makes a huge difference. I'll bet if you go test drive an E92 335i and E92 M3 back to back, while not going above 6k in the M3 as you did in your test drive of the E93, you'll have the exact same opinion (the M3 feels slow). |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|