|
|
11-13-2017, 10:22 PM | #201 |
Save the manuals!
5997
Rep 6,728
Posts |
__________________
'16 M3 | '23 718 Spyder Past: E92 M3, F87 M2, E39 M5, etc |
Appreciate
0
|
11-26-2017, 10:41 PM | #204 |
First Lieutenant
77
Rep 316
Posts
Drives: C63S Sedan|350Z
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Somewhere, AZ
|
^^^what he said.
Damn that S85 really scoots in a smaller & lighter E9x. It makes 0-201mph pulls look like cakewalk
__________________
C63S Sedan: Long Live The V8
350Z: The Very Poorman's 981 GT4 |
Appreciate
0
|
11-27-2017, 10:45 AM | #206 |
Private First Class
16
Rep 108
Posts |
Would still love to see this with a DCT tough.
__________________
E92 BMW M3
B8.5 S4 |
Appreciate
0
|
11-27-2017, 08:23 PM | #207 |
Banned
825
Rep 3,387
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-20-2017, 01:23 PM | #208 |
Major General
1567
Rep 8,074
Posts
Drives: 11 E90 M3 Individual
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston, TX
|
Love to do this in a track car! Would avoid a lot of complications.
__________________
2018 F30 320iX Melbourne Red
2011 E90 M3 Monte Carlo Blue 2004 E46 M3 Imola Red 2000 E36/7 Z3 Steel Blue |
Appreciate
0
|
04-14-2018, 02:15 PM | #209 |
Major
413
Rep 1,178
Posts |
I like the passage at the end of the video when a 2nd white e92 m3 arrives on the lot with a supercharger sound @9:30 and the guy with the Naturally Aspirated white s85 v10 m3 monster looks unimpressed.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-15-2018, 07:51 AM | #210 |
First Lieutenant
152
Rep 303
Posts |
Have never seen this before. Always been my fantasy. Wanted an E60 M5 so bad was just too bulky and problematic to justify over an E92 M3.Looks like that guy had the motor integrated pretty good.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-15-2018, 10:47 AM | #211 |
Major
413
Rep 1,178
Posts |
That v10 M3 is what the 2014 f8x M4 should have been from the factory +other improvments like direct fuel injection to improve on fuel efficiency. That would have been a real improvment instead of throwing the towel and sticking a mitsubishi turbo in a 335 3.0l non-bespoke slightly modified engine block which is what the s55 in the f8x M is.
|
Appreciate
2
Stainless 4586.50 SDPLV493.00 |
04-15-2018, 01:28 PM | #212 | |
Driver
2690
Rep 2,714
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-15-2018, 01:56 PM | #213 |
Lieutenant
378
Rep 413
Posts |
Given how much time I've spent in the last year looking at disassembly on mss60 and mss65, anyone seriously interested in doing this, I'd be willing to give it a go. I build a fair amount S85s and the odd s65. This actually wouldn't be all that complicated.
|
04-16-2018, 10:19 PM | #214 | |
Captain
87
Rep 602
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Blue Thunder -2011 LeMans Blue e92 DCT, ZCP, European Delivery. BPM Stage II. Dinan 3.45 Rear. Borla/Encore Innovation Exhaust, LUX Angel Eyes, Forgestar F14's, Turner road armor. "Last of the V-8 Interceptors, a real piece of history..."
|
|
Appreciate
1
SDPLV493.00 |
04-17-2018, 01:39 PM | #217 |
Private First Class
16
Rep 108
Posts |
Even if it was paired to the DCT?
__________________
E92 BMW M3
B8.5 S4 |
Appreciate
0
|
04-17-2018, 06:55 PM | #218 |
Lieutenant
378
Rep 413
Posts |
That's actually the specific reason I started looking into the disassembly in mss60 in the first place.
I'm an M5 guy, so I started off thinking it would be feasible to migrate the DCT code into the mss65 to use DCT on an S85 in an E60. The mechanicals of this swap are trivial at best, the electricals are not overly difficult, the show-stopper is the torque management routines specific to DCT which are present in all versions of mss60 (even before dct was available) and not a single version of mss65. Coincidentally, I discovered that all of the code and maps for control of SMG are present in mss60 so putting an SMG III into an E9x M3 would be trivial as well. Finally, I abandoned the idea using the OEM DMEs when I picked up the MoTeC line and began programming a torque model for the M1 ECU as a lead in to M1 PnP kits for the E6x and E9x chassis, then will move into the Fxx series as the major components of torque management and CAN bus message structure are identical (approx 90%). While writing the M1 DCT module, I ran across some code in mss60 disassembly that kicked me back onto the OEM DME route for a few months. I have a car now that as soon as I get free time to finish the engine build (it's a favor for a friend), is getting the DCT. I already have the modified harnesses and the DCT mated to the block as a test and started writing a calibration file for the DME with the S85 and DCT. Seeing as it's an experiment, it's kind of low priority at the moment. I'm 99% certain it will work having spent quite literally hundreds of hours staring at the disassembly and still 2 hours every morning before starting work on the shop floor. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-17-2018, 07:12 PM | #219 |
Lieutenant
378
Rep 413
Posts |
The unknown to me will be the transplant into the chassis.
For anyone not familiar with the S85, it has it's own range of problems the S65 is free of. Rod bearings are not an "if" on the S85, they're a "when". Clearance seems to solve that, at least in my experience. The S65 is free of VANOS errors and the S85 is a nightmare with VANOS solenoid and the HP VANOS pump that goes with it. Most often the problems are the result of rod bearing swarf, but the VANOS pumps themselves are vulnerable to picking debris as well. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-18-2018, 12:14 AM | #220 | |
Driver
2690
Rep 2,714
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|