|
|
02-19-2014, 10:04 AM | #23 | ||
Banned
82
Rep 2,688
Posts |
Quote:
(GT500 and McLaren) were equal at high speed on the highway, the DCT car would get the advantgage on the 0-100mhp(given they both had DRs)! Seems to me like a DCT tranny helps even more at lower speed where the gears are shorter and there is even more shifting to do! Anyway, the GT500 is an incredible machine for the price and I respect it and their buyers but it's lacking too much in a lot of department to be interesting for me! A DCT M3 with 650hp that you can exploit in almost every situation seems a lot more appealling then a 750-800hp Stang that can't put the power down under 70-80mph or without DRs! |
||
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2014, 11:13 AM | #24 | |
Captain
47
Rep 719
Posts |
Quote:
Love the concepts of both
__________________
2012 BMW E92 M3 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2014, 11:38 AM | #25 |
Colonel
177
Rep 2,301
Posts |
Actually, it's more like 9.XXs with bolt ons and Dr's.
__________________
'07 335I w/ Mods
'13 X1 Stock '11 X3 K&N |
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2014, 12:22 PM | #26 |
Captain
70
Rep 920
Posts |
__________________
09 E92 M3,AW/FR. MODS:Performane Kidney Grills,Side Gills,Exhaust Tips,BMW Performance Pedals,359 Satin Black GTS Wheels,275/35/19R & 255/35/19F PSS's,Dinan Stage I Suspension,Macht Schnell Spacers 12mmF,5mmR,Rear Fogs,Euphoria 6k,LCI Tails,LUX v3,OEM IND Painted Alpine White CF Performance Spoiler, Front Splitters, and Front Reflectors,Gloss Black Hood Vents,M Performance Steering Wheel.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-20-2014, 12:40 PM | #27 | ||
Banned
82
Rep 2,688
Posts |
Quote:
http://www.dragtimes.com/blog/lambor...m_medium=email |
||
Appreciate
0
|
02-20-2014, 01:22 PM | #28 | |
Captain
47
Rep 719
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2012 BMW E92 M3 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-20-2014, 01:44 PM | #29 |
Putcha ang ganda...
281
Rep 5,441
Posts |
if you want a beast get the GT500.. Test drove one and its freakin insane. BUT interior was a killer for me. everything was wobbling inside the cabin.. BUT its a beast...
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-20-2014, 01:53 PM | #30 |
Brigadier General
380
Rep 3,934
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-21-2014, 06:55 PM | #31 |
Second Lieutenant
39
Rep 220
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-23-2014, 11:56 AM | #32 | ||
Second Lieutenant
4
Rep 202
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
02-23-2014, 12:08 PM | #33 | |||
Banned
82
Rep 2,688
Posts |
Quote:
|
|||
Appreciate
0
|
02-24-2014, 10:55 PM | #35 |
Banned
82
Rep 2,688
Posts |
Well it makes sense since it has basicly the same engine has the C63 507 which is N/A with only ~50hp more! I don't know why I always thought it had a supercharger!
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|