458 italia VS E92 M3 Ess VT2-575

[DLSJ5]

Originally Posted by Judah

Disagree...
What's the purpose of a near 200 mph top speed and low 3 second 0-60 if it's not about straight line speed. I think that's the excuse given when the more expensive car loses. Cause you're not going around corners at near 200 mph speeds,(track or street). Granted, the 458 isn't -solely- about straight line speed but it's a big part of what makes a Ferrari a Ferrari.

Dead on.

[Alex07M3]

Originally Posted by Judah

Disagree...
What's the purpose of a near 200 mph top speed and low 3 second 0-60 if it's not about straight line speed. I think that's the excuse given when the more expensive car loses. Cause you're not going around corners at near 200 mph speeds,(track or street). Granted, the 458 isn't -solely- about straight line speed but it's a big part of what makes a Ferrari a Ferrari.

And I answer the same thing to peolple who say it's stupid to try to make the M3 faster in straight line because the car was'nt made for that , the car was made for everything, not only to take curves!