|
|
|
View Poll Results: Which of the following best applies to you? | |||
I bought my car new and properly followed break-in procedure. | 125 | 65.79% | |
I leased my car new and properly followed break-in procedure. | 37 | 19.47% | |
I bought my car new and completely disregarded break-in procedure. | 19 | 10.00% | |
I leased my car new and completely disregarded break-in procedure. | 9 | 4.74% | |
Voters: 190. You may not vote on this poll |
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
07-21-2011, 09:31 AM | #46 |
One mod leads to another ...
419
Rep 2,900
Posts |
Way to go FORD! I love it. My brother just bought a Mustang GT 5.0. The car feels huge, but has no useable back seat. Weird. BUT that thing can run. For the money, FORD has a real winner in the GT's, Boss 302, etc.
__________________
Current: 2014 F10 M5 Previous: 2015 F80 M3, 2013 E92 M3, 2013 F10 M5, 2009 E90 M3, 1998 E36 M3 |
Appreciate
0
|
07-21-2011, 09:36 AM | #47 | |
One mod leads to another ...
419
Rep 2,900
Posts |
Quote:
The real key here is varied RPMs and not doing anything crazy until the oil is up to operating temp. The way you should drive anyway.
__________________
Current: 2014 F10 M5 Previous: 2015 F80 M3, 2013 E92 M3, 2013 F10 M5, 2009 E90 M3, 1998 E36 M3 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-21-2011, 09:55 AM | #48 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
171
Rep 1,530
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2011 E92 JB/BL/DCT--->80K Miles
2015 F80 SS/SO/DCT?->28K Miles 2015 Porsche 911S |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-21-2011, 10:31 AM | #49 |
One mod leads to another ...
419
Rep 2,900
Posts |
Yep. And no you didn't suggest just running on cruise but I was afraid someone would take it that way.
__________________
Current: 2014 F10 M5 Previous: 2015 F80 M3, 2013 E92 M3, 2013 F10 M5, 2009 E90 M3, 1998 E36 M3 |
Appreciate
0
|
07-21-2011, 10:32 AM | #50 |
Brigadier General
2360
Rep 4,255
Posts |
There is no reason to not follow the BMW advised break in period other than total stupidity. It's in the manual for a reason. To the people not following this procedure, the used community hates you.
__________________
///M Power
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-21-2011, 11:37 AM | #52 |
Major General
818
Rep 7,887
Posts |
How do you figure this?Many of my engines that have been broken in quick have been driven over 400000 kms with no issues by the next owners that I sold to.One of my race engines from my 325 after 18000 track kms that was installed in a street car went 180000 kms with no issues before I lost track of it.Show me your examples.I have many more to support my method of "breakin".
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-21-2011, 11:55 AM | #53 |
Private
14
Rep 62
Posts |
I'm not here to advocate not following the break-in procedures, but every car nowadays is pre-broken in from the factory. Most of the break in recommendations are precautionary at best.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-21-2011, 12:21 PM | #55 | |
Brigadier General
2360
Rep 4,255
Posts |
Quote:
The point here is that a certain engine problem could have potentially have been *assisted* by a poor/abusive/failed break in procedure. Nobody knows for sure, as you clearly know but felt like asking a loaded question. Nevertheless, it doesn't hurt to follow the manufacturer's recommendations. It gives the next buyer peace of mind as well. Let me ask you this instead, what basis do you have for assuming BMW is out to lunch on their break-in recommendation? e.g., why are they wasting the ink in the manual? I don't mean your "race engines" or whatever else you have. I mean why is BMW doing it? You suggest that you are still in fact, doing a break in procedure of sorts, so you must not entirely disregard a break in.
__________________
///M Power
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-21-2011, 01:34 PM | #56 |
New Member
0
Rep 18
Posts |
Non M3 owner here..
...But my dad, a mechanic of 25 years, owner of many a performance vehicle and current owner of '98 MB slk230 put it quite plain and simple to me and my buddy a few months ago who had just gotten his 2011 camaro with aprox. 10 miles on the clock, he explained that an engine fresh off the assembly line has clearly never been run before, sure everything has been put on it but had it ever fired up and run? Have the various gaskets been sealed or held pressure under normal driving conditions? Have the cylinders pumped up and down against the cylinder walls and gotten warm before? The answer is clearly no. The engine has not run. Just as it can be bad to rev to the limit on a cold start in the dead of winter it can be bad to run an engine hard that's never even been warm in it's life. Another proof to this is that when they do the 1200 mile service and you happen to look in the oil that has been drained you'll notice plenty of metal shavings, the engine has to wear itself in. Damn people.. You don't have to be an M-division head engineer to put the pieces together as to why a break-in period is a smart move.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-21-2011, 02:17 PM | #57 |
Brigadier General
2360
Rep 4,255
Posts |
+1. I saw my STi's broken-in oil and it was a little unnerving. Lots of particles.
__________________
///M Power
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-21-2011, 03:44 PM | #58 |
Major
176
Rep 1,379
Posts |
Please see this post for what you need to know about the break in:
http://www.m3post.com/forums/showpos...4&postcount=19
__________________
Clean cars are happy cars! CANON PHOTOGRAPHER |
Appreciate
0
|
07-21-2011, 03:47 PM | #59 | |
Major
213
Rep 1,395
Posts |
I think the poll results are pretty indicative of how most owners treat their cars. I think it's safe to say that roughly 10 to 15% of M3s have not been broken in "properly."
As others have pointed out though, modern engines may not need it. I don't know what to believe anymore. I still think it is best to follow BMW procedure than to go with the methods outlined in HB's post. Too much could go wrong it seems like and the last thing you need is BMW pulling up the data on a computer and denying a warranty claim for failure to follow break in procedure. I believe such a denial may be plausible under the law if they have evidence of abuse or owner misuse. Quote:
Yes, this is the same thing HB posted. I don't think you will find many owners breaking in their car under that method. I wish a BMW engineer could come on here and justify the break in procedure ON THE MERITS. Not with some marketing or gimmicky bullshit. Frequent oil changes early on sounds like a very interesting proposition to keep in mind for future reference ...
__________________
Club 6MT 2008 E92 M3 6MT, AW/Blk Ext., brushed aluminum 2006 E46 M3 ZCP 6MT Carbon blk/blk(sold) 2001 E46 325Xi 5MT Jet Blk/Blk (sold) Last edited by Seattle S65B40; 07-21-2011 at 03:54 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-21-2011, 03:57 PM | #60 | |
One mod leads to another ...
419
Rep 2,900
Posts |
Quote:
If break-in was so important, don't you think all manufacturers would follow a very similar process? The fact that BMW says 1200 miles and Ford says 100 miles should prove most of worry is over nothing. A engine is basically a engine, with many common parts, no matter if it is in a tractor, plane, or a car. BMW doesn't really have anything unique going on here.
__________________
Current: 2014 F10 M5 Previous: 2015 F80 M3, 2013 E92 M3, 2013 F10 M5, 2009 E90 M3, 1998 E36 M3 |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-21-2011, 04:12 PM | #61 |
Private First Class
3
Rep 135
Posts |
I agree with the hard break in but in this case, I was told that the computer holds that data and it's pulled at the 1st service and it could be an issue for the warranty. I did a few pulls to the top and that helps a lot and they don't care about that.
Here's one for you all www.youtube.com/watch?v=26X_s28ilYs |
Appreciate
0
|
07-21-2011, 04:47 PM | #62 |
Major
213
Rep 1,395
Posts |
There you have it, Folks. Number one reason to follow the break in right there...
__________________
Club 6MT 2008 E92 M3 6MT, AW/Blk Ext., brushed aluminum 2006 E46 M3 ZCP 6MT Carbon blk/blk(sold) 2001 E46 325Xi 5MT Jet Blk/Blk (sold) |
Appreciate
0
|
07-21-2011, 05:59 PM | #63 |
Private First Class
27
Rep 113
Posts |
Just like to point out that you can follow the BMW break in procedure however it is a bad idea to baby the new motors because
Driving the new car under 2500 rpm in first to fourth gears can put high load on the motor and piston rings will not break in properly. When that happens engine will consume more oils. I did the break in procedure my way (driving harder for the first 200 km ) and happy to report that my all my cars have no issues. Happy Motoring |
Appreciate
0
|
07-21-2011, 06:27 PM | #64 | ||
New Member
0
Rep 18
Posts |
Quote:
To put it simply Ford sells cars and trucks hence the 100 mile break in period, BMW sells lifelong driving beasts. Big difference in manufacturing ideals will often result in different caretaking recommendations. Just saying yo.. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
07-21-2011, 06:29 PM | #65 | |
New Member
0
Rep 18
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-21-2011, 06:34 PM | #66 | |
New Member
0
Rep 18
Posts |
[QUOTE=AMPowerJ;10072066]
Quote:
Cmon.. That just didn't make any sense |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|