BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > E90/E92 M3 Technical Topics > Suspension | Brakes | Chassis
 
BPM
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      10-21-2010, 09:58 PM   #1
rzm3
Moderator
rzm3's Avatar
673
Rep
4,737
Posts

Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA

iTrader: (18)

Arrow "Tighten in Normal Position"

I was looking at the torque specifications for the rear suspension arms, and I noticed under many torque values, there is "tighten in normal position".

I believe this means that you have to jack up the particular suspension arm you are working on to lift it into its normal steady state position, and then tighten to the specified torque value.

Clarification: see post #22.
Attached Images
  
Appreciate 0
      10-22-2010, 07:29 AM   #2
sparkyg
Brigadier General
sparkyg's Avatar
142
Rep
3,523
Posts

Drives: A6 Allroad
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Oil Country

iTrader: (5)

So you mean unloaded?

Normal seems to mean at rest sitting on the ground, not on the jack.
Appreciate 0
      10-22-2010, 07:42 AM   #3
Gearhead999s
Major General
Gearhead999s's Avatar
814
Rep
7,888
Posts

Drives: RR Velar R=Dynamic M2C R1200GS
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Toronto

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by sparkyg View Post
So you mean unloaded?

Normal seems to mean at rest sitting on the ground, not on the jack.
It means as sitting with the wheels loaded.BMW and a lot of other manufactures have had those instructions for a long time.
Appreciate 0
      10-22-2010, 07:50 AM   #4
rzm3
Moderator
rzm3's Avatar
673
Rep
4,737
Posts

Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA

iTrader: (18)

So do most people/shops actually follow this instruction?
Appreciate 0
      10-22-2010, 08:11 AM   #5
Gearhead999s
Major General
Gearhead999s's Avatar
814
Rep
7,888
Posts

Drives: RR Velar R=Dynamic M2C R1200GS
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Toronto

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by rldzhao View Post
So do most people/shops actually follow this instruction?
Good ones yes!But the thing to remember that you need a ramp type hoist to have access to do this.If you dont do this the bushings can be bound up in normal suspension movement.
Appreciate 0
      10-22-2010, 11:08 PM   #6
Malek@MRF
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
Malek@MRF's Avatar
United_States
731
Rep
3,735
Posts


Drives: E92 M3, E46 M3, G82 M4
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Irvine, California

iTrader: (5)

This should be normal understood procedure from any competent technician or installer. Doing it any other way is completely wrong.

I would hope most do it this way.

Either a ramp, or hydraulic loader from underneath should be used if the car is on a lift with the wheels off the ground.

Not doing it this way will cause the car to perform poorly and destroy the bushings much quicker.
__________________
BMW PERFORMANCE SPECIALISTS. Race Engines. Suspension. F/I. Brakes. Race Preparation. Factory Service. Alignments.
OFFICIAL PARTNERS: KW. MOTON. Brembo. AP Racing. BBS Motorsport. iND. HRE. Turner Motorsport. VAC. BMW Motorsport.

Facebook | Instagram | Yelp! | Flikr
Phone: 949-233-0448 | E-Mail: info@mrfengineering.com
Appreciate 0
      10-23-2010, 07:44 PM   #7
JAJ
Captain
80
Rep
961
Posts

Drives: 2014 Shelby GT500
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by rldzhao View Post
I was looking at the torque specifications for the rear suspension arms, and I noticed under many torque values, there is "tighten in normal position".

I believe this means that you have to jack up the particular suspension arm you are working on to lift it into its normal steady state position, and then tighten to the specified torque value.
This is correct for everyone but you. For you, it actually means "whilst phoning Moton customer service".
Appreciate 0
      10-24-2010, 12:05 AM   #8
montreal red
chris
montreal red's Avatar
Canada
278
Rep
12,144
Posts

Drives: White Boat
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto

iTrader: (31)

hmm... what kind of work would require the disassembly and re-assembly of these parts? would you need to do this for a coilover install? sorry i am not very knowledgeable when it comes to suspension components.
__________________

Current: 2013 F10 M5 & 2016 Mini JCW
2013 GLK350 (gone), 997.1 GT3RS (gone), 2009 WRX STI (gone), e92 M3 (gone)
Appreciate 0
      10-24-2010, 02:44 AM   #9
JAJ
Captain
80
Rep
961
Posts

Drives: 2014 Shelby GT500
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by montreal red View Post
hmm... what kind of work would require the disassembly and re-assembly of these parts? would you need to do this for a coilover install? sorry i am not very knowledgeable when it comes to suspension components.
Changing the rear suspension (damper, spring, or both) involves removing the bottom bolt on the damper and the bolt that ties the Camber Link to the Wheel Carrier. Both have to be reinstalled "in normal position". There are no bolts in the front suspension that have to be done this way.
Appreciate 0
      10-24-2010, 01:04 PM   #10
montreal red
chris
montreal red's Avatar
Canada
278
Rep
12,144
Posts

Drives: White Boat
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto

iTrader: (31)

^^^^
interesting.
my coilover install was done at a shop that didnt have a hydraulic platform lift to do work like that. it was hoisted on a regular lift and tightened while there was no load on the suspension components.

i've been driving the car with KWs installed for the whole summer. anyone knows what kind of damage could i be facing?
__________________

Current: 2013 F10 M5 & 2016 Mini JCW
2013 GLK350 (gone), 997.1 GT3RS (gone), 2009 WRX STI (gone), e92 M3 (gone)
Appreciate 0
      10-24-2010, 03:12 PM   #11
rzm3
Moderator
rzm3's Avatar
673
Rep
4,737
Posts

Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA

iTrader: (18)

~they must have jacked up the lower camber some what to align it with the wheel carrier. I would not worry to much about it. Just inspect it every couple months.
Appreciate 0
      10-24-2010, 05:26 PM   #12
montreal red
chris
montreal red's Avatar
Canada
278
Rep
12,144
Posts

Drives: White Boat
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto

iTrader: (31)

Quote:
Originally Posted by rldzhao View Post
~they must have jacked up the lower camber some what to align it with the wheel carrier. I would not worry to much about it. Just inspect it every couple months.
thanks for the reassurance. i believe they did use something to push some of the links up so that they can bolt everything together but the wheels were definitely off the ground and there was not much of a load on it.

i've seen people do coilover installs in their own garage and they dont put any load on the suspension when bolting everything together so i didnt think it was much of an issue.

but this is nevertheless interesting to take note of.
__________________

Current: 2013 F10 M5 & 2016 Mini JCW
2013 GLK350 (gone), 997.1 GT3RS (gone), 2009 WRX STI (gone), e92 M3 (gone)
Appreciate 0
      10-24-2010, 05:48 PM   #13
Gearhead999s
Major General
Gearhead999s's Avatar
814
Rep
7,888
Posts

Drives: RR Velar R=Dynamic M2C R1200GS
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Toronto

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by montreal red View Post
thanks for the reassurance. i believe they did use something to push some of the links up so that they can bolt everything together but the wheels were definitely off the ground and there was not much of a load on it.

i've seen people do coilover installs in their own garage and they dont put any load on the suspension when bolting everything together so i didnt think it was much of an issue.

but this is nevertheless interesting to take note of.
Then they did not follow the proper procedure as specified by the manual.Whether that makes any difference in life or performance of the bushing is another issue.
Appreciate 0
      10-24-2010, 10:32 PM   #14
JAJ
Captain
80
Rep
961
Posts

Drives: 2014 Shelby GT500
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC

iTrader: (4)

I've done my rears a few times now, and here's what I experienced:

First, to align the bolt holes for the 14mm bolt that holds the Camber Link onto the Wheel Carrier, you have to lift the Camber Link up to almost the fully loaded position. Just tighten it then. My opinion is that this instruction only applies to the regular 3-series in any case. On the M3, the connection in question is a ball joint; it's free to rotate, relieving any tension from the bolting process.

Second, for the rear damper, KW or OEM, the lower bolt passes through a sleeve locked in a rubber bushing. It needs to be bolted at the appropriate height or the bushing will be twisted at static ride height.

As for doing it at home, the rear Camber Link is a breeze to lift with a jack - you just have to remember to do it.
Appreciate 0
      10-24-2010, 11:21 PM   #15
montreal red
chris
montreal red's Avatar
Canada
278
Rep
12,144
Posts

Drives: White Boat
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto

iTrader: (31)

Quote:
Originally Posted by JAJ View Post
I've done my rears a few times now, and here's what I experienced:

First, to align the bolt holes for the 14mm bolt that holds the Camber Link onto the Wheel Carrier, you have to lift the Camber Link up to almost the fully loaded position. Just tighten it then. My opinion is that this instruction only applies to the regular 3-series in any case. On the M3, the connection in question is a ball joint; it's free to rotate, relieving any tension from the bolting process.

Second, for the rear damper, KW or OEM, the lower bolt passes through a sleeve locked in a rubber bushing. It needs to be bolted at the appropriate height or the bushing will be twisted at static ride height.

As for doing it at home, the rear Camber Link is a breeze to lift with a jack - you just have to remember to do it.
anyway i can check to see if my bushings are twisted or deformed? i just dont know which part i should be checking or looking at.
__________________

Current: 2013 F10 M5 & 2016 Mini JCW
2013 GLK350 (gone), 997.1 GT3RS (gone), 2009 WRX STI (gone), e92 M3 (gone)
Appreciate 0
      10-25-2010, 12:14 AM   #16
rzm3
Moderator
rzm3's Avatar
673
Rep
4,737
Posts

Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA

iTrader: (18)

Check for grease leaks and if there is excessive play.
Appreciate 0
      10-25-2010, 11:10 AM   #17
montreal red
chris
montreal red's Avatar
Canada
278
Rep
12,144
Posts

Drives: White Boat
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto

iTrader: (31)

Quote:
Originally Posted by rldzhao View Post
Check for grease leaks and if there is excessive play.
thanks, i'll jack the car up and take a look at the bushings when i change to my winter wheels and tires.
__________________

Current: 2013 F10 M5 & 2016 Mini JCW
2013 GLK350 (gone), 997.1 GT3RS (gone), 2009 WRX STI (gone), e92 M3 (gone)
Appreciate 0
      10-25-2010, 01:04 PM   #18
Malek@MRF
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
Malek@MRF's Avatar
United_States
731
Rep
3,735
Posts


Drives: E92 M3, E46 M3, G82 M4
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Irvine, California

iTrader: (5)

Quote:
Originally Posted by rldzhao View Post
~they must have jacked up the lower camber some what to align it with the wheel carrier. I would not worry to much about it. Just inspect it every couple months.
Jacking up the arms high enough to align the arms for reassembly is no where close to being in "normal position" as it has to pushed up much further.

For the front suspension, this applies to all fellow M3posters who have modified their suspension:

-Tighten your top hat bolts (the 3 13mm bolts) with the wheel hub under load. This will ensure trouble free and noise free operation and will not strain the upper hat stud threads.

-For the front damper, tighten the center bolt while the system is compressed, it will ensure the bolt fully tightens. If this bolt isn't fully tightened, you may experience noise immediately or eventually down the line.

-Anti-roll bar end link.. Suspension must be aligned correctly, then tightened. Do not barely align it and expect the bolt the pull the suspension into its proper position, you must put it there first.

-Malek
__________________
BMW PERFORMANCE SPECIALISTS. Race Engines. Suspension. F/I. Brakes. Race Preparation. Factory Service. Alignments.
OFFICIAL PARTNERS: KW. MOTON. Brembo. AP Racing. BBS Motorsport. iND. HRE. Turner Motorsport. VAC. BMW Motorsport.

Facebook | Instagram | Yelp! | Flikr
Phone: 949-233-0448 | E-Mail: info@mrfengineering.com
Appreciate 0
      10-25-2010, 11:29 PM   #19
JAJ
Captain
80
Rep
961
Posts

Drives: 2014 Shelby GT500
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by montreal red View Post
thanks for the reassurance. i believe they did use something to push some of the links up so that they can bolt everything together but the wheels were definitely off the ground and there was not much of a load on it.

i've seen people do coilover installs in their own garage and they dont put any load on the suspension when bolting everything together so i didnt think it was much of an issue.

but this is nevertheless interesting to take note of.
Loading isn't an issue - it's all about position. When the car's in it's static loaded position on the ground, the suspension arms are at an certain angle relative to the bolts that hold them. If there's a rubber bushing in the bolt hole, then you want that bushing to be "relaxed" in that position with no twist applied by the arm.

If you tighten the bolts in the same position as they will be when the car is standing on it's wheels, then they're in the right place, loaded or otherwise.

While many purists will argue the only way is to put the tires on and lower the car onto its suspension before tightening, frankly you can measure the position of the hub relative to the fender opening with a tape measure and tighten the bolts while you support the control arm on a hydraulic jack. If you do one side at a time, the car never rises off the lift holding the body when the arm is at the correct height.
Appreciate 0
      10-25-2010, 11:34 PM   #20
JAJ
Captain
80
Rep
961
Posts

Drives: 2014 Shelby GT500
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vancouver, BC

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malekreza11 View Post
Jacking up the arms high enough to align the arms for reassembly is no where close to being in "normal position" as it has to pushed up much further.

For the front suspension, this applies to all fellow M3posters who have modified their suspension:

-Tighten your top hat bolts (the 3 13mm bolts) with the wheel hub under load. This will ensure trouble free and noise free operation and will not strain the upper hat stud threads.

-For the front damper, tighten the center bolt while the system is compressed, it will ensure the bolt fully tightens. If this bolt isn't fully tightened, you may experience noise immediately or eventually down the line.

-Anti-roll bar end link.. Suspension must be aligned correctly, then tightened. Do not barely align it and expect the bolt the pull the suspension into its proper position, you must put it there first.

-Malek
I think rldzhao was talking about the rear suspension.

You are correct with respect to the front suspension, although that particular set of cats can be skinned other ways. It's about getting everything firmly in place before tightening. The anti-roll bar end links are ball joints, so they have no rotation orientation to worry about. As for getting all this stuff correctly in place, if someone's doing a DIY and they don't know what "correct" looks like and how to get it all there, they'd best get a pro to do the work.
Appreciate 0
      10-25-2010, 11:36 PM   #21
rzm3
Moderator
rzm3's Avatar
673
Rep
4,737
Posts

Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA

iTrader: (18)

After much thought I still don't understand why "tighten in normal position" is needed.

My thinking is, most of these joints are just ball joints, which is allowed to rotate about the bolt axis freely. This is what allows it to articulate when installed. The only issue I can think of are the lubrication boots, as they may be strapped to a non-moving part.

Please correct me if I am wrong.
Appreciate 0
      10-25-2010, 11:53 PM   #22
rzm3
Moderator
rzm3's Avatar
673
Rep
4,737
Posts

Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA

iTrader: (18)

I think I finally get it.

For ball joints (left side of each arm in picture below), tightening in normal position probably does not matter because it is free to rotate.

But for actual bushings (right side of each arm), tightening in normal position will matter because the rubber will be loaded when not in normal position.

When we do a rear spring/shock replacement, the lower camber arm outer joint is a ball joint, that's why it is OK to tighten that joint when NOT in normal position.

Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 PM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST