|
|
06-14-2007, 05:55 AM | #111 |
Private
3
Rep 51
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-14-2007, 07:06 AM | #112 |
Moderator
7515
Rep 19,368
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-14-2007, 08:15 AM | #113 | |
Colonel
755
Rep 2,736
Posts |
Quote:
A dealer has to be willing to take part in this transaction. If the dealer chose not to then they (dealer) would be within their rights to move on to the next person in line. They are obligated to sell to the person on listed the sales contract. Some dealers will take part in this process, others will not. So, I would say that the dealers are equally at fault if anyone is assigning blame. Most dealers feel that a sale is a sale. Personally, I don't have a problem with it. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-14-2007, 08:15 AM | #114 | |
Colonel
755
Rep 2,736
Posts |
Quote:
A dealer has to be willing to take part in this transaction. If the dealer chose not to then they (dealer) would be within their rights to move on to the next person in line. They are obligated to sell to the person on listed the sales contract. Some dealers will take part in this process, others will not. So, I would say that the dealers are equally at fault if anyone is assigning blame. Most dealers feel that a sale is a sale. Personally, I don't have a problem with it. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-14-2007, 08:16 AM | #115 | |
Colonel
755
Rep 2,736
Posts |
Quote:
A dealer has to be willing to take part in this transaction. If the dealer chose not to then they (dealer) would be within their rights to move on to the next person in line. They are obligated to sell to the person on listed the sales contract. Some dealers will take part in this process, others will not. So, I would say that the dealers are equally at fault if anyone is assigning blame. Most dealers feel that a sale is a sale. Personally, I don't have a problem with it. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-14-2007, 08:16 AM | #116 | |
Colonel
755
Rep 2,736
Posts |
Quote:
A dealer has to be willing to take part in this transaction. If the dealer chose not to then they (dealer) would be within their rights to move on to the next person in line. They are obligated to sell to the person listed on the sales contract. Some dealers will take part in this process, others will not. So, I would say that the dealers are equally at fault if anyone is assigning blame. Most dealers feel that a sale is a sale. Personally, I don't have a problem with it. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-14-2007, 08:18 AM | #117 |
Moderator
7515
Rep 19,368
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-14-2007, 08:23 AM | #118 | |
Colonel
755
Rep 2,736
Posts |
Quote:
A dealer has to be willing to take part in this transaction. If the dealer chose not to then they (dealer) would be within their rights to move on to the next person in line. They are obligated to sell to the person listed on the sales contract. Some dealers will take part in this process, others will not. So, I would say that the dealers are equally at fault if anyone is assigning blame. Most dealers feel that a sale is a sale. Personally, I don't have a problem with it. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-14-2007, 09:44 AM | #119 |
New Member
0
Rep 9
Posts |
Thats a great idea. But what do you do if / when you cant sell the spots? You've tied up all that cash and will have received zero return. Basic economics my friend...... Is locking down $5000 in deposits for a year and not getting a dime in interest worth more to you than investing it at an assumed 6% ? Back to economics 101 for you.
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-14-2007, 10:59 AM | #120 | |
Lieutenant
35
Rep 563
Posts
Drives: 2007 E92 M3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: London
|
Quote:
Perhaps you would care to comment as to the relative childishness of some recent posts in thread! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
06-14-2007, 11:18 AM | #121 |
Lieutenant
35
Rep 563
Posts
Drives: 2007 E92 M3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: London
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|