|
|
12-13-2012, 03:27 PM | #2 |
M-Flight Member
38
Rep 1,085
Posts |
Stock intake is very efficient. There are no real gains to be made with an aftermarket intake, best option is just a decent drop in filter.
__________________
2011 Le Mans Blue M3// Black extended Novillo w/ Blue Grey Aluminum trim/DCT/ZTP/ZCW/ZPP/ZCP Premium Sound ///Akrapovic Evolution Exhaust
2015 Audi S4 Prestige, Brilliant Black S-tronic 2012 Le Mans Blue 135i M Pkg DCT |
Appreciate
0
|
12-13-2012, 03:55 PM | #3 |
New Member
0
Rep 29
Posts |
Bimmerworld recorded 8+ HP increase with the Macht Schnell on their ex Grand Am E92 M3. For GA, BW used a stock engine, stock intake, Motec engine managment and unrestricted header back exhaust. From what I understand this was the only change to the aforementioned package.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-13-2012, 04:04 PM | #4 |
I'm suckin gas but I'm haulin ass
57
Rep 783
Posts |
The Macht Schnell intake makes a noticeable difference in power and sounds great too. For the dollar/power ratio I would go MS versus the Dinan.
The Macht Schnell Stage 2 made +10-12WHP and +5-10WTQ on my car. More importantly, the MS Stage 2 made more power than a drop in filter alone. Here is my thread detailing the dyno findings http://www.m3post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=570629 |
Appreciate
0
|
12-13-2012, 04:04 PM | #5 |
361
Rep 5,859
Posts
Drives: Vorsteiner E60 M5
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 1460 White Oaks Rd. Suite F. Campbell, CA 95008
|
We ran an Active Autowerke drop in filter on a customer's M3 initially and then swapped it out for the Dinan intake. Other than the Dinan adding a very nice bit of CF to the engine bay performance was about the same.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-13-2012, 04:07 PM | #6 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
268
Rep 1,883
Posts
Drives: 2011 E92 M3
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: One of the coasts...
|
Quote:
Drop in filter and call it a day...
__________________
'11 BMW E92 ///M3 - ZCP and DCT
'15 Ford F-250 - Lariat, 6.7 Powerstroke Turbo-diesel |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-13-2012, 04:50 PM | #7 |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
3387
Rep 7,541
Posts |
+1 to drop in filter. Dinan one is very aesthetically pleasing though.
__________________
-----| Like us on Facebook | Instagram || Tuning Information | Remote Coding |----- ----Visit us at www.BPMSport.com - Emotion. Driven. | Toll Free: (888) 557-5133---- |
Appreciate
0
|
12-13-2012, 05:31 PM | #8 | |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
8115
Rep 18,814
Posts
Drives: BMW
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Anaheim, CA
|
Quote:
Go with whatever makes you feel better.
__________________
Tom G. | european auto source (eas)
email: tom@europeanautosource.com · web: https://europeanautosource.com· tel 866.669.0705 · ca: 714.369.8524 x22 GET DAILY UPDATES ON OUR BLOG · FACEBOOK · YOUTUBE · FLICKR · INSTAGRAM |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-22-2012, 10:40 AM | #9 |
Colonel
499
Rep 2,400
Posts |
MS has S&B filter...according to tests done by S&B, particle filtration is slightly better than K&N (filter used by Dinan) or AFE. S&B uses exact same material on all their filters and they post comparative tests for their direct sold filters for trucks on their website. The MS and Dinan intakes have a similar larger cross-sectioned elbow design.
There are several videos out there with Steve Dinan and how Dinan improved upon the E60 M5 intake. These videos demonstrate 1) not all hp is necessarily maxed out by the factory for many different reasons; 2) improvements are possible and testable; 3) Dinan actually spends so much time engineering stuff like intakes and every theoretical design is tested in the real world and oftentimes they have found designs that theoretically should have worked better but didn't in practice. The facilities that Dinan has in Morgan Hill and what they do for racing and street (both BMW and other engines such as Ferrari) is impressive and probably the best outside of Europe, so when they say something (or produce something with advertised hp gains, which btw happens to be smaller vs everyone else's), chances are it's pretty credible. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|