|
|
03-20-2007, 08:34 AM | #45 |
Lieutenant Colonel
20
Rep 1,504
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-20-2007, 03:44 PM | #46 |
Lieutenant
15
Rep 471
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-20-2007, 05:01 PM | #47 |
Lieutenant General
611
Rep 10,407
Posts |
I'll add to the OT here (it's good OT)
On the Cayman issue... I haven't driven it but can defintiely respect all the great things I have read about it. I'd love to drive the Cayman S. I also read they did not put an LSD in purely because of performance. If they would have Porsche said directly it would smoke the 911 on the ring. All that being said, personally, the car does nothing for me looks wise. Looks wise I see it as a 911 wanna be and the car just strikes me as a bit feminine. Even if I loved the looks the lack of LSD would be a deal breaker.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-20-2007, 05:06 PM | #48 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
20
Rep 1,504
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-12-2007, 12:23 PM | #49 |
Secret Agent
97
Rep 496
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-12-2007, 01:21 PM | #50 |
Lieutenant General
1312
Rep 10,185
Posts |
What he said
__________________
BMW if you are reading, I need a job, Please. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-12-2007, 02:51 PM | #51 | |
Lieutenant
50
Rep 503
Posts |
Quote:
The Cayman is a good car, probably a great car and certainly more enjoyable to drive than the Boxster, but it felt slow in a straight line compared to the Z4M (it was around 10 mph slower by the end of the 2 mile straight), and it just didn't require much driver input to conduct a fast lap. It was a close run thing though, really all the Cayman needs is a little more power and a Lsd. We ran an article in EVO a few months earlier when we tested the Boxster S against the Z4M, by driving them both to the Nurburgring. That was fun, but again the Boxster just felt too accessible and easy and so was not as rewarding to drive. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|