|
|
09-27-2013, 10:06 AM | #1 |
Mr. Nice Says Hello
634
Rep 16,662
Posts
Drives: BMW M3 | X5 xdrive 35i MSport
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: USA
|
Evolve Cars at the Track (video)
I just wanted to share this video that my friend Lost Marine (Evolve Supercharged E92 M3) has shared with me.
First Race is Evolve Tuned F10 M5 and Evolve Tuned E60 M5 (Mod list is in the video) Second Video is Evolve Supercharged E92 M3 vs. Audi R8 (v10) vs. Evolve Tuned F10 M5 and vs. ESS Supercharged E92 M3 (vt-625) |
09-28-2013, 09:26 PM | #4 |
Colonel
190
Rep 2,431
Posts |
My evolve tune and exhaust e63 m6 put down a healthy 465 whp and a stock f10 m6 put down 500 right after. Evolve is no joke
__________________
F80 m3, 997 gt3, 14 ram ctd, f15 x5, drz400sm Gone:z4m, boss 302, c6 z06, m6,z3m |
Appreciate
0
|
09-29-2013, 03:16 AM | #5 |
Banned
205
Rep 7,298
Posts |
Great cars but are you seriously calling this a track?
I was waiting for some excitement and then just didnt even bother finishing the video. No shit the cars are fast in a straight line. Its rather boring. |
Appreciate
0
|
09-29-2013, 07:21 AM | #6 |
Captain
23
Rep 638
Posts |
WHOA!
Your saying the Evolve M3 just massacred the R8 ( nothing particularly special) but then an F10 M5 , thats also tuned- waiting on some numbers but hell that car impressively beat the E60 And then an ESS 625 M3? The ESS car cant be running right, they put down well over 550 rwhp at 7.5psi on over Id say 90% of the dyno's. So either the Evolve car is making more than that (at 6.5 PSI) or the ESS has a boost leak. What I do like though, is that the evolve M3 seems to have gobbs of Torque at any rpm range, every run itthere started pulling, no waiting for boost.. I do very much like that, just what the M3 needs, down low TQ |
Appreciate
0
|
09-29-2013, 12:10 PM | #7 | |
Mr. Nice Says Hello
634
Rep 16,662
Posts
Drives: BMW M3 | X5 xdrive 35i MSport
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: USA
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-29-2013, 12:17 PM | #8 |
The Jesal
391
Rep 5,859
Posts |
DCT vs 6mt........
DCT won every race. FIGHT!
__________________
2009 E90 M3 - SOLD
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-29-2013, 12:29 PM | #9 | |
Captain
23
Rep 638
Posts |
Quote:
If so, then the slaughter of the ESS 625 MT car would be expected. Seems the Evolve kit is running very well from its other video against a tuned GT500 (550-570rwhp) that was neck and neck. Given the GT500 uses a Positive displacement (just like the HARROP) and they have instant boost/tq, that would substantiate the claims of rotrex owners saying its a beast in the low rpms. Its nice to see a combination that has TQ low and HP high, thats just what the S65 needs |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-30-2013, 02:41 PM | #10 | |
Second Lieutenant
18
Rep 241
Posts
Drives: 2011 E93 M3
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Annapolis, MD
|
Quote:
__________________
2013 F10 M5/TTFS CUSTOM TUNE/PURE S1 TURBOS/METH/AMS CL DPS/RPI CATBACK/KW SLEEVE OVERS/RPK FRONT LIP/M PERF REAR SPOILER/20" LOMA SUPERTEC SUPERLIGHTS
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-30-2013, 07:23 PM | #11 | |
Captain
23
Rep 638
Posts |
Quote:
That's why some people dont even try to argue peak HP, but AVG HP, as some dyno's give that number as well. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-01-2013, 03:46 AM | #12 | |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
5357
Rep 3,788
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-01-2013, 09:58 AM | #14 |
It ain't gonna suck itself
50
Rep 817
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-01-2013, 10:11 AM | #15 |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
729
Rep 10,103
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-01-2013, 10:13 AM | #16 |
Mr. Nice Says Hello
634
Rep 16,662
Posts
Drives: BMW M3 | X5 xdrive 35i MSport
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: USA
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-01-2013, 11:24 AM | #18 | |
Private First Class
3
Rep 159
Posts |
Quote:
Racing up to 120+ MPH a DCT car can net an easy 2-3 car lengths over a manual car if power is equal depending on the skill of the manual driver. Gears will also give the M3 more pull off the line at lower speeds. The only independent Dyno I have seen of the evolve kit was posted in the dyno database "link below". At 6.7 psi it makes less HP than an ESS VT1-550 kit running 5 psi and there is nothing in the graph to suggest a power advantage anywhere in the power curve as some has suggested. My guess is that the car you ran against is not running the 6.7 psi that the owner of the car in the dyno database is. If it was only making around 450 WHP then you should have been able to run at least equal or beat it if your manual VT2-625 is making 520+ WHP as most do. http://www.bigdynodatabase.com/DynoG...16-WAYNEM3.jpg |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-01-2013, 04:41 PM | #19 |
Captain
50
Rep 873
Posts |
Guys don't compare a car that has been dyno tuned and a car with a flash.
Not saying anyone here did that but there could be a massive gap in advertised power because of how the car was tuned. Typically, you can expect as much or more than 5% gains when a car visits the dyno for real tuning. 335 Cobb guys are seeing 40+ WHP with dyno tunes and all the bolt on's over the base maps they give you
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-01-2013, 08:10 PM | #20 | |
Captain
23
Rep 638
Posts |
Quote:
autocouture- love the attitude, that tells us your not in it for the money but for the atmosphere and fun- your builds show some beautiful cars, its great to see they can go as much as they show. Would love to see DCT Vs DCT; No matter who the winner is, as they are still driving boosted M3s and im sure loving every second of it. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-01-2013, 08:17 PM | #21 | |
It ain't gonna suck itself
50
Rep 817
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-02-2013, 05:11 AM | #22 | |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
92
Rep 1,064
Posts |
Quote:
Steven Nestore's car runs 6.7 PSi. Wayne's car ran under 5 PSi on when it made 450rwhp due to one of the vacuum hoses not being connected to bank 1 blow off valve. Once connected back up, runs a consistent 6.5 PSi on the road again. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|