|
|
10-12-2011, 06:10 PM | #1 |
Major General
592
Rep 5,396
Posts |
I have read a lot about the popular spring replacement setups that people use, typically using a shorter bumpstop and shaved strut mounts to provide the strut with more travel.
However, my question is wouldnt the strut get damaged, or not be used correctly, if forced to extend or compress further than stock as it would have to with a shorter bumpstop and shaved strut mounts? I have a hard time understanding why it wouldnt be at the very least somehow different from how it would perform stock since the range of motion is extended...? Also, how does the amount of shock travel not get comprimised in the rear? Thanks for any insight into this. |
10-13-2011, 01:39 AM | #2 | |
Supreme Allied Commander
3837
Rep 54,348
Posts
Drives: F80 M3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Barbara, AP, Brembo, GIAC, Koni, Ohlins, Performance Friction, www.hpautosport.com
|
Quote:
There is a little bit of safety margin built into the suspension, by cutting down on the front and rear bump stops(it's a band aid solution) you are still okay, just have less of a safety margin before strut of shock damage is all. What really needs to happen is the use of short body struts and shocks when lowering your car to get some of the compression travel back. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-16-2011, 02:35 PM | #3 | |
Major General
592
Rep 5,396
Posts |
Quote:
I feel the same way, like almost all of these options are sort of "half assed". The question that I have is of the coilover level suspensions, which ones have shortened shock/strut bodies and what is the ideal level of lowering to maximize the travel allowed?
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-01-2011, 07:42 PM | #4 | |
Supreme Allied Commander
3837
Rep 54,348
Posts
Drives: F80 M3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Barbara, AP, Brembo, GIAC, Koni, Ohlins, Performance Friction, www.hpautosport.com
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|