|
|
02-15-2017, 11:11 AM | #90 |
Lieutenant General
5216
Rep 10,603
Posts |
There are probably half a dozen flex fuel conversion kits on the market, some for $400-$500. Do before and after dynos of yours. Maybe someone will try another and test it as well. I would try one, but the nearest E85 is 75 miles away so an E85 blend is not a practical option for me.
Here is a good article on flex fuel. GM apparently found running full E85 to be worth about 3% in power. Other sources say up to 5%, with no tuning changes. So even with a pump gas E85 blend that works out to E50, you should still pick up a little power. This is due mainly to the cooling effect of the greater fuel quantity needed when running E85 or a significant blend. http://www.caranddriver.com/features...economy-page-7 Last edited by pbonsalb; 02-15-2017 at 11:20 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-16-2017, 02:42 PM | #91 |
New Member
19
Rep 19
Posts |
Factory systems like on GM's are set up terribly from the factory and many actually reduce power in the tune intentionally. This can be changed in the tune and added in on vets and Camaro's ect we have done a lot with these systems as well. The article you mention is a pretty poor article when it comes to actual performance, you can find plenty of articles of people bashing ethanol but you can find even more cars making serious power with it. Millage does vary but these cars have to run Premium so running E85 wont cost you any more and you do make more power there is really nothing to be lost here dollar wise on fuel.
I'd steer clear of any universal "kit" I really dont want to be lumped in with that garbage. This is full and true flexfuel specifically for these cars. We have plenty of dyno's and track time. Here is a dyno from last night. I showed up at EuroCharged ATX with what I thought was just 93 pump but turns out I still had 22% ethanol, ran the car 3 times and made 360 whp, a little low for my car I thought but thats what the dyno said. Added 10 gallons of Valero pump E85 that tested at E68 that brought my car up to 66% Ethanol (tested at the sensor in the line) and did another 3 pulls. Car picked up 15whp, all of this was done over about 30 min and the only variable was another 44% ethanol. This is what we see over an over again and the guys at EuroCharged ATX are a stocking dealer for us and are happy to answer any questions and no BS dyno data. [IMG]M3 Dyno by Ryan Truax, on Flickr[/IMG]
__________________
|
Appreciate
1
R_lara80.00 |
02-16-2017, 05:33 PM | #93 | |
SLOOM3
18
Rep 37
Posts
Drives: 2011 M3 DCT, 2015 F80 M3 DCT
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North Richland Hills, TX
|
Thank you!
Quote:
Last edited by TT_SM3RF; 02-16-2017 at 05:39 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-16-2017, 05:39 PM | #94 | |
SLOOM3
18
Rep 37
Posts
Drives: 2011 M3 DCT, 2015 F80 M3 DCT
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: North Richland Hills, TX
|
Welcome Aboard
Quote:
Sorry I don't have any illustrations but the install is pretty straight forward. You have already spoken to Ryan and I'm sure he answered alot of your questions. We've already exchanged some messages here on M3post but if you have any additional questions let me know. Good Luck! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-16-2017, 08:05 PM | #95 |
Private
64
Rep 74
Posts |
Fellas , Ive been running on E85 for almost 5months now thanks to Gintani's E85 conversion kit , I previously had the stg2+ with the V3 blower on 98US then upgraded to V2Ti blower with E85 kit as im having a Low Compression motor being built by PPM - Australia and I will be needing more boost .
Currently still running on stock motor with the ethanol , results below : Car setup : 6MT Gintani Stage 2+ with upgraded Blower ( V2ti Vortech) ARH catless headers Syvecs S6 plus PnP ECU Meth/water mix Upgraded E85 fuel pumps and injectors (Gintani Setup) Dyno used : Dyno Dynamics / Mainline Hub Dyno - Both read around 30~40 whp roughly less than a Dynojet When the car had the Stock ECU tune on E85 , we got 580whp on Mainline hub dyno , after the syvecs we ran the car on E50 (50%Ethanol/50% pump gas -93 US i believe ) and we got 648whp/435ft.Lb and that was @ 7750rpms as the car was going lean after that (needs better fuel pumps ) video check my IG for more info @ghassasino Last edited by E90_M3_Dubai; 02-16-2017 at 08:11 PM.. Reason: add text |
Appreciate
1
GabeS1180.00 |
02-16-2017, 09:04 PM | #96 | ||
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
1431
Rep 1,612
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
02-17-2017, 08:29 AM | #97 | |
New Member
19
Rep 19
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-17-2017, 10:59 AM | #98 |
Private First Class
21
Rep 182
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-17-2017, 01:00 PM | #99 | ||
Banned
825
Rep 3,387
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
02-17-2017, 04:37 PM | #100 | |||
Major
337
Rep 1,489
Posts |
Quote:
|
|||
Appreciate
0
|
02-18-2017, 01:09 AM | #101 |
Private First Class
26
Rep 188
Posts |
Can anyone else comment and say they have gotten this kit? Seems almost like a lot of trouble (and money $1200) just to raise some octane levels a bit.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-18-2017, 06:15 PM | #103 |
Private First Class
90
Rep 162
Posts |
My $0.02 is that this is a waste of money if you aren't gaining timing overhead.
The stock DME already has the capability of altering fuel trims to allow for ethanol blends. On stock trim limits, an E35-E40 blend is what most users can get before a fault is triggered (reference the Ethanol thread: http://www.m3post.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1011930) For users with aftermarket tunes, the tuner can change the trim limit to allow for even greater ethanol blends, completely negating the need for this device. The closed-loop lambda control is very fast on the MSS60, and there are no ill-effects other triggering a fault when the trim limit is reached. In which case, add a couple gallons of standard pump gas back into the tank. On my setup (Harrop SC) I picked up an additional 24whp / 18wtq by blending up to E40. Same day same dyno. No resetting of timing adaptations. Logs showed a difference of ~.3 degrees of timing at peak torque (in favor of the pump gas), so I wasn't gaining that power from added advance, simply from the fuel makup.
__________________
2009 E90 M3 DCT
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2017, 02:50 PM | #104 | |
Private First Class
26
Rep 188
Posts |
Quote:
So you just added some e85 to your 93 and the car corrected on its own? Basically like using an octane booster? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2017, 02:53 PM | #105 |
Private First Class
26
Rep 188
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2017, 03:24 PM | #106 | |
Private First Class
90
Rep 162
Posts |
Quote:
The closed loop lambda control is blind to the fuel type in the car. It only knows to target lambda values based on the targets table. Fortunately for us wanting ethanol blends, lambda value for best-power is almost the same as standard gasoline. The DME will throw a fault if too much trim correction is required to reach target lambda. That is when you know you've reached your blend limit |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2017, 06:09 PM | #107 | |
Private First Class
26
Rep 188
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2017, 06:25 PM | #108 | |
Private First Class
21
Rep 182
Posts |
Quote:
From my research its a lot of a better alternative than meth injection.. so many high hp motors use e85, I'm shocked it's not researched more on this platform. Anyway, I bought it, and will be the one testing it out next... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2017, 08:06 PM | #109 |
Private First Class
26
Rep 188
Posts |
Can someone from Advanced Fuel Dynamics comment and explain why I should spend the $1200 on their product rather than mixing E85 myself and monitoring my AFR not too go to lean myself?
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-19-2017, 08:07 PM | #110 | |
Private First Class
26
Rep 188
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|