|
|
03-25-2008, 02:19 AM | #23 |
chris
277
Rep 12,144
Posts |
think both cars are sick but they were built with very different enthusiasts in mind... so perhaps this is why people on this forum like the bimmer more...
__________________
Current: 2013 F10 M5 & 2016 Mini JCW 2013 GLK350 (gone), 997.1 GT3RS (gone), 2009 WRX STI (gone), e92 M3 (gone) |
Appreciate
0
|
03-25-2008, 05:58 AM | #24 |
Major General
2158
Rep 5,364
Posts |
lol +1, it's mean. Fog light surround is a little large, but the front does look great.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-25-2008, 08:13 AM | #25 |
Lieutenant Colonel
73
Rep 1,603
Posts
Drives: F80 M3
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: WHO DAT NATION
|
It's the best view. The backside however.... yuk.
__________________
2015 SO/SO MT M3 :: Exec : Lighting : Adaptive : HK : CF trim : Full leather : DAP : Black 19's : sunshade
Crystalline tint 40%/70% on windshield : M performance mirrors, spoiler, splitters : Status Gruppe CF lip : RKP diffuser : Fully dechromed Bavsound Stage 1 : V1 Savvy hardwired : Self-coded |
Appreciate
0
|
03-25-2008, 10:24 AM | #26 |
Racying Dynamics
118
Rep 4,391
Posts |
I like the front but it may be a bit over the top, they could have eliminated the fog lights all together for a cleaner look!
__________________
==================================================
Last edited by KonigsTiger; 04-16-2008 at 05:35 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2008, 02:28 PM | #28 |
Racying Dynamics
118
Rep 4,391
Posts |
Thanks SS, they are Breyton Springs that drop the car 2.5cm front and 1.8cm rear. Perfect!!!
__________________
==================================================
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2008, 03:40 PM | #29 |
Lieutenant
28
Rep 449
Posts |
thanks for the review...pretty much backs ups what I was thinking. IMO the ///M looks a hell of a lot better then the c63 and i think your pictures back that up.
the c63 maybe better on paper in a str8 line but every AMG driver I have ever pulled up next to never seems to want anything to do with a little competition...mostly rich wives wearing oversized shades or corporate types too busy on the blackberry to pay attention to the road...
__________________
AW E92 M3|E92 LuX|Piaa GTX H3| Rear Fog Light Mod | Ventureshield (Raja) |Eisenmann Race Exhaust |Macht Schnell Filter | Black Grills | Black Sides | H&R Springs | Fabspeed X-Pipe & High Flow Cats| CF VRS II rep diffuser|Most powerful Scoops in the world| |
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2008, 03:44 PM | #30 | |
Racying Dynamics
118
Rep 4,391
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
==================================================
Last edited by KonigsTiger; 03-26-2008 at 04:40 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2008, 04:26 PM | #31 | |
Captain
193
Rep 657
Posts |
Quote:
I've been in several C-classes and I wasn't impressed. It felt cheap and looked cold for a Mercedes. In the german trio the new C-class has the worst interior. The press seem to feel the same as me, particulary the german press. I cant comment on C63 since I only seen the car from the outside but since it cost more than other C-classes I hope the interior is better because in normal C-classes I wasn't impressed at all. Other than the interior I like the C-class. In Avantgarde trim the car is sexy and C63 is hot as hell to look at. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2008, 04:39 PM | #32 | |
Racying Dynamics
118
Rep 4,391
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
==================================================
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2008, 04:44 PM | #33 |
Captain
193
Rep 657
Posts |
yes I've been in various C-classes and various 3-series. 3-series is better overall. The new Audi A4 also has some cheap materials in some places, makes me wonder if Audi is starting to save money. I guess I have to buy a japanese car if I want quality
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2008, 04:47 PM | #34 |
Racying Dynamics
118
Rep 4,391
Posts |
Hahaha!! Well, Japanese cars IMO are the best bang for your buck!!! Really!!! But I really do like German cars better even though the price tag is higher. At the end of the day, they feel better and are more fun!!!
__________________
==================================================
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2008, 05:13 PM | #36 | |
Racying Dynamics
118
Rep 4,391
Posts |
Quote:
Yep, looks bad!!! That is also what bothered me about the new 325 and C!!! Oh well!!!
__________________
==================================================
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-15-2008, 03:37 PM | #38 | |
Lieutenant General
1112
Rep 12,442
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
Past: '08 E92 335i|ZPP|ZSP|6AT
Past: '15 Mustang GT|401A|PP|6MT Current: '20 Shelby GT350|6MT |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-15-2008, 04:25 PM | #39 |
Racying Dynamics
118
Rep 4,391
Posts |
There is no such thing as a manual AMG! But anyway, the interior of the 63 is not bad at all!
__________________
==================================================
Last edited by KonigsTiger; 04-15-2008 at 06:36 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
04-15-2008, 04:25 PM | #40 |
Racying Dynamics
118
Rep 4,391
Posts |
That could be a good thing!
__________________
==================================================
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-15-2008, 06:10 PM | #41 |
Colonel
55
Rep 2,484
Posts |
thanks for the side by side pics! the M3 truly looks better.
__________________
08 E92 AW M3 | HRE P40 19" | APE Air Filter | BMW Performance Grills | White Side Gills | CF Mirror Covers | BMW Performance Pedals | F1 Pinnacle Tint | V1 Hardwire | Dinan Performance Software | Gintani Exhaust | H&R Sports Springs | RPI Scoops | BMW CF Spoiler | Challenge Diffuser | Lux H8 V3 | LCI Tail Lights | |
Appreciate
0
|
04-15-2008, 06:36 PM | #42 | |
Banned
4143
Rep 6,926
Posts |
Quote:
Since I wouldn't be tracking a heavy car like this. I would choose the C63 for driving on the streets. The raw power is just to much to pass up. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-15-2008, 06:37 PM | #43 |
Racying Dynamics
118
Rep 4,391
Posts |
+1!
__________________
==================================================
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-16-2008, 08:32 AM | #44 |
//Mdicted
346
Rep 9,988
Posts
Drives: a Cop Magnet
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 495 Ring
iTrader: (18)
Garage List 2009 e92 M3 DCT CF ... [10.00]
2015 S-Works Roubaix [0.00] 2013 Trek Madone 5.9 [9.50] 2012 Scott - CR1-Pro [10.00] 2008 e92 M3 6MT (Up ... [10.00] 2002 e46 M3 Cabriol ... [7.00] 2006 e90-325i (DD) [7.00] 2002 e39 M5 (retired) [9.50] |
defnitely the M3 looks alot better for sure, but lets not all sing "gumbaya!"
and see that the emperor doesnt have better clothes. MB, Audi and ISF of that matter marketing strategy is not to WOW! everyone on the street with its fender flares, wheels and such. They are more subtle road killers on the roads and some people like that. AMG division for it 40th Anniversary promised and deliver a powerful blow of mass HP/TQ power to the market place this year. It is illustrated by it CLK55 in black edition and this new C63 AMGs. We are not even talking about them with their optional Performance package optioned car yet. Lbs for lbs torque C63 has the nos and it can deliver it as illustrated by Motortrend Mano-Mano Comparo of the ISF. M3 and C53. Yes the emperor has no clothes, lets be real. Which makes some of us think twice, well me at least. The last thing I would like to believe after my e92 /M purchase is that I am the king of my Class, and have a lady with a c63 AMG blow me away. Mind you, around 80-90% of this torque can be delivered at pretty much any RPMs, now thats something to think about. Im still scare, but thanks to the company of my /M boys I feel safe. For in nos. there is strength. But are these the nos. we are just concerned about, lets ask yourselves that.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|