|
|
10-30-2013, 02:47 AM | #1 |
Lieutenant Colonel
142
Rep 1,637
Posts |
Help me decide between two e92 M3s
Hey guys,
I'm having difficulty weighing the pros and cons of an imminent e92 M3 purchase. Hopefully you can help point me in the right direction. Car #1 - $42,000 - 2011(.5) Mineral White / Fox Red - ZCP, Prem, Nav - 59k miles Car #2 - $42,000 - 2009 Alpine White / Fox Red - Prem, Conv, Nav - 19k miles Both cars are similarly well maintained and do not have any red flags (clean Carfax and no "immediate" maintenance issues). My question: Which car will be more desirable in 2 years? Or said more plainly, which car is the "better deal"? Thanks for the advice! |
10-30-2013, 10:13 AM | #3 |
General
63083
Rep 24,611
Posts |
Pics... ?
__________________
"MAX VERSTAPPEN" IS THE 2021+2022+2023 F1 WORLD CHAMPION - #UnLeashTheLion
BPM DEV-Tune & DCT Software-Tune & Servotronic & coding ///Alpine HID Angeleyes ///Oem.exhaust mod. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-30-2013, 05:48 PM | #7 |
Lieutenant Colonel
142
Rep 1,637
Posts |
Interesting that the low-mile car (#2) is getting the nod. My gut tells me that the 2011 ZCP, regardless of mileage, will be more desirable in 2+ years. Do miles really trump age?
It's tough out there. I need a car in 2-3 weeks time and my options are scarce. There are no 2011 36k-ish ZCPs to be found at or slightly below the $50k mark. I'm leaning ZCP. It's a lease turn-in (imagine his mileage penalty lol) from a dealer I have solid relationships with. |
Appreciate
0
|
10-30-2013, 08:29 PM | #8 | |
Major
353
Rep 1,404
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-31-2013, 09:59 AM | #10 | |
Major
353
Rep 1,404
Posts |
Quote:
The CPO would, I think, be worth it. Mainly because the car would be put through some fitness requirements laid on by BMW itself. Once those requirements are met and the CPO is granted, it means BMW is willing to bet you the money you put up for the CPO that the cars major components will go trouble free (or relatively so) for the next 40k miles (or until 2017). Another way to look at it is, they have to trust the cars future performance as much as you do. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-31-2013, 10:07 AM | #11 |
Smooth shifts
4
Rep 63
Posts |
I'd go for the less miles option #2. All of your services are based on mileage. Less mileage means the major services are further into the future. Money saved in the short term. My 2 cents....
__________________
2008 E92 6MT M3 (Silverstone metallic/CF roof)
1999 Yamaha R1 (soon to have BMW HP4) Helicopter pilot (R22 and R44) |
Appreciate
0
|
11-01-2013, 12:05 PM | #12 | |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
2106
Rep 13,876
Posts
Drives: E92 M3 & F80 M3 & G82 M4
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Lynnwood, WA
|
Quote:
I would have to say that it also depends how many miles you plan to put on it.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
11-03-2013, 08:33 PM | #13 |
Lieutenant Colonel
142
Rep 1,637
Posts |
Thanks for all the input guys. It drove me to do a little more digging.
Car #3 - $48,000 - 2011 Space Gray / Black - ZCP, Prem, Conv, Tech - 32k miles Warranty and Maintenance through Oct. 2014 (or 50k). Bought her on Friday |
Appreciate
0
|
11-04-2013, 01:00 PM | #14 |
Major
37
Rep 1,440
Posts
Drives: '10 Legacy, '07 Kia Sorrento
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: ...location, location?
|
#2.
Less mileage > more options.
__________________
try { Life.Live(); } catch (Experience exp) { Console.WriteLine(exp.ToString(); } finally { Brian.Dispose(); }
"There are only 10 kinds of people in the world; those that read binary, and those that don't." |
Appreciate
0
|
11-12-2013, 02:20 AM | #15 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
142
Rep 1,637
Posts |
Quote:
Thanks again for the input. Wouldn't have kept searching had it not been for this thread. Last edited by grantmax; 05-08-2015 at 06:39 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|