|
|
01-17-2012, 09:30 PM | #23 |
New Member
0
Rep 15
Posts |
Yeah the factory lie-o-meter does just that, lie. Everyone of them is skewed to read a little on the plus side. Its not that car makers cant figure out the math, its that they want it that way. Hand calc. is the only way to go. I average 16mpg with a mix of city and hwy miles. Best tank so far 19mpg all hwy at 77mph cruise control. Worst 14mpg. I used to own a tuned diesel truck making 450 HP and 800 FT/LBS Tq. 6.4 L , best mileage in that was 14.2mpg. Wost 10.6mpg so the way I see it 16 aint bad at all!
__________________
2010 E92 M3, DCT, 19" wheels, Black on Black, Carbon leather trim, Bone stock.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-17-2012, 10:28 PM | #24 |
Major
354
Rep 1,405
Posts |
Computer currently shows 21.3. It's been as high as 21.5.
About 7700 miles on the car. Not much stop and go driving. Do not like the low-on-gas warning coming on at quarter tank. Love this thing! |
Appreciate
0
|
01-18-2012, 02:06 AM | #26 |
Second Lieutenant
2
Rep 264
Posts |
Keep in mind that ethanol blends lower your fuel economy (too bad it doesn't lower your fuel bill!)
I drive with a pretty heavy foot and get the same 16.x miles per gallon with the M that had with my wife's XC90 V8, my Superduty diesel pickup I just sold, the S60R 6MT I used to own and track on occasions, the old Ford Taurus I always rented from Hertz on business trips years past, etc. Not sure why but I tend to drive everything with a heavy foot and I always average out to 16.x miles per gallon (except in our boat of course!) I had an Infiniti G37X rental last week and got the same magical number (of course I thrased that engine quite a bit - lovely motor.) The only recent exception has been a couple of recent hybrids that averaged in the low to mid 20s. Regardless, I'm not complaining. If I wanted better fuel economy I wouldn't have bought a car that begs to be driven hard. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-18-2012, 09:34 AM | #27 |
Ultimate Driver for the Ultimate Driving Machine
146
Rep 1,146
Posts |
I dont think anyone really complains about the mpg, most people complain about the size of the tank. it would be nice to have a 100 litre (26.5 US gallons) tank instead of the 65 litre. A 3.35 in US or for instance another engine 3.20 in europe they all have the same size gas tank size but they are much more fuel efficient, so they dont have to refill evey 5 days.
__________________
BMW M3 E92 - Silverstone II BPM Sport Stage II Tune + Test Pipes, GTS DCT Tune |
Appreciate
0
|
01-18-2012, 09:44 AM | #28 | |
Happy Camper
613
Rep 7,869
Posts
Drives: C63 AMG & 280 SL on Weekends :
Join Date: May 2010
Location: GTA, Ontario - Canada
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 1969 Restored Merce ... [7.50]
2011 M3 Coupe TRADED [7.34] 1987 BMW 535is [1.00] Cars from the Past [6.50] The ///M3 Engine S65 [9.59] |
Quote:
In general I am not concerned about this issue at all if I was then I would not be driving a ///M3. Fuel consumption on our cars all depends on how we drive as we all know.
__________________
Cheers, Rolf-Dieter
Life will take us to some interesting places, fortunately The ///M3 will too with a many of us know this very well, now my C6.3 AMG with 487 HP does it too ---> Click here for some good stuff I found |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-19-2012, 06:40 AM | #30 |
Gruppa krovi-na rukave
9
Rep 221
Posts |
What tuner did you use that you got that low of numbers? I use a 210 tune from Spartan and ended up with 480 with 909 ft/lbs tq.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-19-2012, 09:00 AM | #31 |
New Member
0
Rep 15
Posts |
I had a custom tune from River City Diesel. The 450 tune with a DOC, DPF delete pipe, S&B intake, 20" wheels with 35 BFG's, and a heavy right foot. All that torque was really fun but I have to say I like my M3 much better!
__________________
2010 E92 M3, DCT, 19" wheels, Black on Black, Carbon leather trim, Bone stock.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-19-2012, 09:01 AM | #32 |
New Member
0
Rep 15
Posts |
Edit: the 10.6mpg was stock with DPF and DOC intact.
__________________
2010 E92 M3, DCT, 19" wheels, Black on Black, Carbon leather trim, Bone stock.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-19-2012, 09:44 AM | #33 |
Gruppa krovi-na rukave
9
Rep 221
Posts |
RCD tunes are clean from what i hear. 20s w/35s are not horsepower/MPG friendly. 6.4s are surely fun and are stupid easy to tune ( not easy to work though ) but i am heading toward M3 or a 5 ASAP upon my return to US
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-19-2012, 04:16 PM | #34 | |
Captain
56
Rep 868
Posts
Drives: 2011 E90 M3, Jerez Black
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: SF Bay
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-19-2012, 04:24 PM | #35 |
Captain
72
Rep 959
Posts |
Even at 250miles/tank works out to 15mpg ... not 20
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|