|
|
02-23-2011, 04:37 PM | #67 |
I like cars
329
Rep 5,052
Posts |
You mentioned losing oil and that the light came on. Do you mean your engine dumped oil when the rod came through the block, or do you mean your oil consumption increased during the month leading up to the complete failure?
Also, I was just on RealOEM and I don't see where rod bearing part numbers changed for the M3. I see where crankshaft bearings changed, but not connecting rod bearings. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-23-2011, 04:54 PM | #68 |
Major General
2759
Rep 5,484
Posts |
From realoem.com
2008 rod bearings 11247841702/3 2008 crank bearings (up to 10/08) 11217841489 2009 rod bearings 11247841702/3 2009 crank bearings 11217841610 (several part numbers presumably for cranks that need the journals re-ground during a rebuild/reman) Looks like the crankshaft part number has been superseded in the system with the part number for cars produced after 10/08, so crank design probably changed slightly. Perhaps a different chamfer or bearing split for manufacturing/assembly purposes? Would be interesting to have both crank bearings in my hands to do some measuring and look at radii and whatnot. Haven't heard of any crank bearing failures yet but like somebody said, the forums aren't an accurate sampling.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-23-2011, 05:04 PM | #69 | |
Brigadier General
501
Rep 4,033
Posts |
Quote:
I only brought the blower issue up because the engine went through a low oil situation at one time, whether it somehow contributed to the rod bearing failure or not later down the road, I don't know.
__________________
16 F82 M4 DCT - ZCP - JB4 - 556WHP / 570WTQ
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.14s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690WHP/463WTQ Shift-S3ctor E92 M3 - 1/2 Mile Trap Speed WR - 174.13 MPH Last edited by DLSJ5; 02-23-2011 at 05:23 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-23-2011, 07:04 PM | #70 |
Second Lieutenant
21
Rep 294
Posts |
Drew-you have always made wise choices in the past in regards to vendors, it seemed as though you always researched the parts and went with the best company. If Gintani didn't step up where you be at.... still with Gintani or elsewhere? I was wondering where you have been lately. No videos, nada from you. Get back into the scene quickly for all of us M3 fans.
__________________
2015 M4
Looking for a 50' SeaRay |
Appreciate
0
|
02-23-2011, 07:09 PM | #71 |
Second Lieutenant
17
Rep 246
Posts |
I have never ran a supercharger on a stock car. I certaintly would not on the S65. Its already making over 100hp per liter and the compresion is way to high. 8.5-9.1 is ideal def not 11.5. Its shoulnt be a surprise to anyone who knows about cars that this car blew up. Where is the naturally aspirated cam package with a good good set of gears? Safe and maybe a nice power increase. Not everybody wants to spend 15k on a blower and 25k on a stroker, especially on a new car, and hope everytime you drive it it doesnt blow up. Were not talking about a Camaro or Mustang.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-23-2011, 09:21 PM | #72 | |||
Colonel
93
Rep 2,528
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Instead, they buy them to make awesome YouTube videos (that I'm a subcriber of) against other great cars (on roads south of the U.S/Mexico boarder )
__________________
"But resist we much; we must; and we will much; about that be committed." ~Rev. Al Sharpton 2010 E92 M3|Silverstone II|M-DCT|NCSW|2MT|ZCW|ZPP|ZTP|302|507|Gas Guzzler Tax |
|||
Appreciate
0
|
02-23-2011, 09:51 PM | #73 | |
Second Lieutenant
69
Rep 295
Posts |
Quote:
ESS seems to have a clean track record though. I can't recall seeing any ESS supercharged engines blown, and they seem to be the most popular by far. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-23-2011, 09:52 PM | #74 |
Brigadier General
501
Rep 4,033
Posts |
I'm starting to like you more and more.
__________________
16 F82 M4 DCT - ZCP - JB4 - 556WHP / 570WTQ
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.14s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690WHP/463WTQ Shift-S3ctor E92 M3 - 1/2 Mile Trap Speed WR - 174.13 MPH Last edited by DLSJ5; 02-23-2011 at 10:05 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-23-2011, 10:02 PM | #75 | |
Brigadier General
501
Rep 4,033
Posts |
Quote:
lol, I think a few people might disagree with your first sentence, the amount of drama on the BMW forums with regards to each kit is endless it seems. But for the most part I've been happy with the BMW vendors I dealt with, most of them work hard and just want to make cars go faster, look better, etc. I think that's a fair question, if Gintani did not step up in some way, I would have been very upset. I do think they bare some of the responsibility and they've never said otherwise, luckily it never got to that point, and it is being rectified. A few people have been wondering and I can't blame them. I hope to be back up soon, how is your car, any plans to mod?
__________________
16 F82 M4 DCT - ZCP - JB4 - 556WHP / 570WTQ
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.14s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690WHP/463WTQ Shift-S3ctor E92 M3 - 1/2 Mile Trap Speed WR - 174.13 MPH Last edited by DLSJ5; 02-23-2011 at 10:52 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-23-2011, 11:31 PM | #76 |
Private First Class
13
Rep 195
Posts |
Kudos to you for turning this into a valuable learning experience for the forum. It's obvious that you've found the limits of the S65 in terms of boost at this CR. For many considering a SC, you now have an established boundary for making a good decision.
As far as Gintani goes, never underestimate the difficulty and character it takes to do the right thing in a difficult situation. In this case it seems the OP had full disclosure and understood the risks. IMO Gintani went above and beyond. Please keep us posted on the autopsy of the motor and the rebuild. Glad to see your DCT handling the power without incident. Good luck.
__________________
2009 Silverstone II E92 M3 Coupe - DCT
Dinan Exhaust, RPi scoops, Dinan Tune, Dinan Pulley, BMC filter, LCI Taillights, MS 15mm spacers, Huper Optik tint. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-23-2011, 11:34 PM | #77 |
Proove It!
39
Rep 618
Posts |
This problem is actually more common than people think. While I worked at BMW I personally had one s65 we had with ticking sound and was running weird with random fcs. after I took it apart and inspected I was advised by BMW to replace all rod and crank bearings. Also at BMW training their was another tech who had replaced a completely stock blown motor due to oil starvation which led to a seized bearing and a kabooom.
Most m3 owners that are not enthusiast like some one mentioned, are not on forums and u will never hear of these cases. However when u work at a dealer u see a lot more stock motor failures or prolems than u would on the forums. Sounds to me like ur stock parts (already weak) and some boost where it makes everything work faster n harder just accelerated the failure that was already bound. Well its part of the sport, stuff happens. Dont worry, your engine is in great hands, can't wait to see u up and racing, I mean running again
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-23-2011, 11:58 PM | #78 |
Lieutenant
41
Rep 560
Posts |
Sorry to hear about your car Drew, I guess it's all part of the game. Gintani has great costumer service and they always put costumer satisfaction first, from what I've seen.
You honestly never know, it's pretty easy to hide things these days. |
Appreciate
0
|
02-24-2011, 12:12 AM | #79 |
Major General
258
Rep 5,012
Posts |
What was determined to be the root cause there? I believe the 'molasses-when-cold' 10/60 oil don't cause, but contribute to the bearing failures due to 'oil starvation' on cold starts (the colder, the worse). It just takes too long to start lubricating properly, so it accelerates wear. And the colder, the worse. But with a blown motor, it's probably a necessity. I wish a corporate technical guy would SPECIFICALLY answer the question why every performance/exotic car, from Porsche, Lamborghini, Ferrari, Aston Martin, etc., call for 5/40 oil (not the typical 'BMW engineers know best' crap), and BMW for 10/60 on the M engines. Seems like a band-aid for a tolerance problem or something. I'm neither a BMW nor Ferrari fan, but there's little question a Ferrari V8 is a higher performance engine, so what excuse do they have.
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-24-2011, 12:25 AM | #80 |
Colonel
167
Rep 2,736
Posts
Drives: 2008 E92 ///M3 Alpine White
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: SoFla - Bonita Springs
|
Ummm....it's pretty difficult to hide things these days....
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-24-2011, 12:25 AM | #81 |
Brigadier General
501
Rep 4,033
Posts |
Glad you will be doing the work Brian, I appreciate it.
__________________
16 F82 M4 DCT - ZCP - JB4 - 556WHP / 570WTQ
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.14s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690WHP/463WTQ Shift-S3ctor E92 M3 - 1/2 Mile Trap Speed WR - 174.13 MPH |
Appreciate
0
|
02-24-2011, 01:49 AM | #82 | |
Brigadier General
249
Rep 3,157
Posts |
Quote:
if you want to play you have to pay. good luck Drew
__________________
Past: Gintani stage3 M3, Cayman GTS present: Porsche 993RWB, 964RS America,996 cupcar, 964 turbo 3.6,Macan Turbo,997GT2,930 turbo,i3, MINI JCW |
|
Appreciate
0
|
02-24-2011, 02:36 AM | #83 |
Private First Class
28
Rep 177
Posts |
Wow Drew, sorry to hear bro! I pop back on the board and this is what i see. You're car was one major factor in my decision to s/c and to go with Gintani. The guys over there treated me right and I'm not surprised that they are handling things the way they are. They are a stand up organization and I think many are starting to see that now.
As far as modding goes you can look at it like gambling too. Many people stay at the low minimum table and bet the minimums they usually don't win or loose big but they definitely don't experience the rush of winning a large hand like those who play a little, or in some cases, alot more aggressive. At the same time the chance of losing big comes with the territory. But, who has ever heard of the house taking care of a guy that had a bad night? Drew's car probably saw more time closer to redline than at idle, I think it is remarkable that the engine made it that far considering the factors mentioned in the op. If everyone with an S/C pushed their car as hard as Drew on a regular basis I'm sure we'd be hearing many more stories regardless of what company made the kit. Drew, I'm looking forward to seeing more of those vids with your mad editing skills! call me and keep me posted on what's up. I think mammoth is the only place worth anything right now, might have to make another boarding trip out there. Ill let you know if I go we can all get together! GL! Ry
__________________
*SOLD 3/2012 *2009 AW 6MT E92 M3 Gintani S/C Stage 2+ 606 WHP, 392TQ SAE Dynojet 93 Pump, Gintani cat-less x-pipe, Gintani Race rear. DPE SP-C16 20x9F, 20x10.5R Toyo T1R 255/30/20F 305/25/20R |
Appreciate
0
|
02-24-2011, 05:28 AM | #86 |
Major General
1570
Rep 8,075
Posts
Drives: 11 E90 M3 Individual
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston, TX
|
I hope things get worked out! Kudos for pushing the limits on the S65.
Obviously, Gintani is willing to take things to the limit...and maybe a tad beyond in this case. Sub'ing to see what happens. I think we can all learn something here. I think ESS is a much more conservative tuner...which, IMO, is why you don't see too many issues with ESS.
__________________
2018 F30 320iX Melbourne Red
2011 E90 M3 Monte Carlo Blue 2004 E46 M3 Imola Red 2000 E36/7 Z3 Steel Blue |
Appreciate
0
|
02-24-2011, 10:58 AM | #87 | |
Private
0
Rep 70
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|