|
|
12-21-2007, 11:40 AM | #1 |
Speed Demon
20
Rep 112
Posts
Drives: The Ultimate Driving Machine
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
|
My Stock E92 M3 Dyno Test Result
Hi,
I ordered the Kelleners tuning kit for my e92 m3 and will receive it next week before new year. They reflash the ecu and delete the first set of cat's "the one after the headers" and replace the second set with 100 cel racing cat's. They claim 40 hp from there kit. I dynoed my car after the 2000 km "1200 m" service and before sending them the ecu to know exactly how much more power i will gain. The test was don on a dynojet dyno and i was runing 98 roz octane fuel "93 ron in the us" http://www.kelleners-sport.com/engli.../e90_motor.htm |
12-21-2007, 12:23 PM | #4 |
Conspicuous consumption
97
Rep 1,183
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2007, 12:49 PM | #8 |
Conspicuous consumption
97
Rep 1,183
Posts |
Wouldn't it be dishonest for BMW to underate it? Kidding aside, I agree with you, but I don't think many people ever thought it was underrated.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2007, 01:54 PM | #10 |
Lieutenant General
609
Rep 10,407
Posts |
Wow, indeed the torque curve is phenomenal. This will contribute to the car feeling less fast as well. But in this way we get decieved. The smooth linear power esp. with DCT will feel just like a freaking gas turbine (of course not in magnitude, just in character).
These figures show a 17% hp loss and 14% torque loss. Not too bad but we did see a 385hp/270 ft lb result here. These translate to only 8% losses. This is just the nature of the beast. Wheel/hub dynos are not absolutely accurate at all but better for A-B comparisons. 6,000 euro for 40 hp, 3,500 of which is for the software. It sure does look even more pathetic on the price when you can get 40 hp for <$200 and 60 hp for <$300 for the 335i here: http://www.bmwjuice.com/ . Granted I know the huge difference between tuning for FI vs. NA but still the price is awfully steep. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2007, 02:27 PM | #11 |
Brigadier General
529
Rep 4,021
Posts
Drives: 2008 335xi Coupe
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The land where we kill baby seals
|
Devil's Advocate
Hey KSA, thanks for posting mate.
I will play devil's advocate here.... It think BMW M made the wrong trade off here. I recognize a flat torque curve is good engineering and makes driving the car on a daily basis a good thing but Ms should have all the torque in the last 2000-3000 RPM, screw the rest of the power band. The last 2000-3000 rpm is where all the action happens. The S65's torque falls off precisely where you want it to be peaking. I am a big boy, flame away.
__________________
"Aerodynamics are for people who cannot build engines"......Enzo Ferrari
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2007, 04:19 PM | #12 | |
Major General
529
Rep 5,498
Posts |
Quote:
Interesting opinion....although 20-30ftlbs is hardly falling off....
__________________
Instagram: jellismotorwerks |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2007, 04:41 PM | #13 | |
Major General
1072
Rep 8,008
Posts
Drives: i4M50
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: No where fast
|
Quote:
Each to there own I say. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2007, 05:30 PM | #14 | ||
Lieutenant General
609
Rep 10,407
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
Last but not least, one reason is to save some room for the CSL! This V8 is not maxed out. |
||
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2007, 06:01 PM | #15 | |
Brigadier General
529
Rep 4,021
Posts
Drives: 2008 335xi Coupe
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The land where we kill baby seals
|
Quote:
I really don't understand why BMW M made this trade off though. If you look at the torque curves for the M5 / M6 V10, it is not linear and has a VTEC like hit at 5000 rpm+.....when mated with a 7 speed SMG box...that is a great combo. When the M-DCT comes out, they are going to keep the engine in the part of the torque curve that is falling....it doesn't make sense to me. I realize it is not much but it is 10% plus.
__________________
"Aerodynamics are for people who cannot build engines"......Enzo Ferrari
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2007, 06:09 PM | #16 | |
Major General
529
Rep 5,498
Posts |
Quote:
The lack of a VTEC (VANOS) like hit you are talking is considered a good thing rather than bad. Sure its fun but linear is better and a significant engineering feet especially since the engine has VANOS... Jason
__________________
Instagram: jellismotorwerks |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2007, 06:42 PM | #17 | |
Brigadier General
529
Rep 4,021
Posts
Drives: 2008 335xi Coupe
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The land where we kill baby seals
|
Quote:
I would prefer that they didn't get this linear curve and opt for the VTEC like bump after 5000 rpm as it would be better for acceleration. I would sacrafice drivability (which is best with flat torque curves) to get faster acceleration.
__________________
"Aerodynamics are for people who cannot build engines"......Enzo Ferrari
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-21-2007, 06:53 PM | #18 | |
Lieutenant General
609
Rep 10,407
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-22-2007, 03:16 AM | #19 |
Second Lieutenant
2
Rep 225
Posts |
Gonna be interesting to see what kind of aftermarket gains can be found for this car. Especially what can be done with software alone. KSA has stated that he'll be dyno'ing again after the ECU tune and again after the cat replacement.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-22-2007, 07:03 AM | #20 |
yodog
196
Rep 5,026
Posts |
i like the torque curve, i wish there was less than a 15% drivetrain loss like the 335i, but maybe it's because of this type of dyno i hope.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-22-2007, 09:53 AM | #21 |
Brigadier General
529
Rep 4,021
Posts
Drives: 2008 335xi Coupe
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The land where we kill baby seals
|
Yes lots of room for tuning.
You will need new camshafts to get any power up top. Also tuner companies will need to play around with the intake runner lengths and obviously play around with the computer.
__________________
"Aerodynamics are for people who cannot build engines"......Enzo Ferrari
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-22-2007, 01:06 PM | #22 |
Lieutenant
23
Rep 464
Posts |
Beautiful torque curve, as flat as Kansas. The only problem is that its too low!
I was a die hard NA guy for a while but once I got a taste of turbo torque and tunability there was just no going back. Apparently the same thing happened to the BMW M folks with rumors of M5 TT's and now even the M3 may get a couple small snails. My $0.02
__________________
2021 AMG E63S Hammer Wagon
2002 BMW Z8 (with a Dinan DP Engine) 1996 Porsche 911 (993) Turbo 1995 Ferrari F355 Berlinetta 6mt 1964 Porsche 356 C Coupe |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|