|
|
05-20-2008, 03:05 PM | #1 |
Private
11
Rep 79
Posts |
Autozeitung: M3 Cabrio vs CLK 63 AMG
BMW M3 Cabrio
4.0l V8, 4 valves/cyl. 420 PS at 8,200 rpm 400 Nm at 3,900 rpm 7-speed DSG, RWD 0-100 km/h: 5.1s 0-160 km/h: 11.2s 0-200 km/h: 17.3s 100-0 km/h: 33.5m Vmax limited to 250 km/h kerb weight: 1,830kg 18m salaom: 64.7km/h MSRP: 77.750 € Mercedes CLK 63 AMG 6.2l V8, 4 valves/cyl. 481 PS at 6,000 rpm 630 Nm at 5,000 rpm 7-speed auto, RWD 0-100 km/h: 4.4s 0-160 km/h: 9.5s 0-200 km/h: 14.6s 100-0 km/h: 34.8m Vmax limited to 250 km/h kerb weight: 1,800kg 18m salaom: 62.3km/h MSRP:96.539 € verdict: This is not fair. The Mercedes CLK is going to retire and the BMW M3 Cabrio is brand new. And you can feeel the difference bethe old and the young one: the CLK is more narrow, less functional and less versatile than the M3 but its great adavantge is the 6.2-Liter-V8. The BMW M3 on the opposite is the more agaile, even the more aggressive drive challanging the driver to find out all its secretsby revving up the engine and keeping it at that performing level. And: The DSG is a must! Big improvement. The M3 wins with 3001 against 2817 pts. http://www.autozeitung.de/online/ren...?render=127406 |
05-20-2008, 03:48 PM | #2 |
Captain
81
Rep 849
Posts |
Wow! The CLK 63 was a lot faster in the straight line for only 60hp. Must be all that torque.
But yeah, I'd take the M3 any day.
__________________
08 E92 335xi Space Gray 6AT - PROcede V2 12.8 @ 111 mph
|
Appreciate
0
|
05-24-2008, 11:40 PM | #3 |
First Lieutenant
77
Rep 363
Posts |
Mercedes+BMW convertibles=Trophy wife cars...
If you want a convertible put down a deposite on a Ferrari California, if the dealer will let you. |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|