|
|
07-10-2007, 12:27 PM | #45 | |
Expert Road Racer
59
Rep 1,329
Posts |
Quote:
If it ended up at 460/375/3300 I would be happy. The car almost exists today. A more aggressively tuned 135 with LSD and M type suspension is almost there, and could be done. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-10-2007, 12:38 PM | #46 | |
Colonel
755
Rep 2,736
Posts |
Quote:
My 997tt is a perfect example of this, which is why the auto is quicker 0-60 than the stick. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-10-2007, 12:44 PM | #47 |
Private
2
Rep 85
Posts |
What's with the title of this thread? If anyone hated the E92 M they wouldn't even bother with this forum, unless they needed medical help.
Every one of us has an interest in one form another in the car. Now some people including myself have been some what dissapointed by the latest reviews. At the end of the day we buy magazines to inform ourselves, anything wrong with that? $60-$70,000 is a lot of dough at least for me, so am I hater for just because I'm not running down to my BMW and leaving a check? I don't think so, based on information recieved so far, it seems logical to test drive the M and few of it's direct competitors before signing the check, no hating but no blind faith either. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-10-2007, 02:41 PM | #48 | |
First Lieutenant
7
Rep 319
Posts |
Quote:
If the shoe fits.... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-10-2007, 02:51 PM | #49 | |
New Member
0
Rep 10
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-10-2007, 03:10 PM | #50 |
Lieutenant Colonel
1757
Rep 1,668
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-12-2007, 12:35 AM | #51 | ||
Conspicuous consumption
99
Rep 1,183
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|