|
|
07-22-2012, 02:44 PM | #1 |
Private First Class
9
Rep 124
Posts |
Would you go from your M3 to an IS-F?
So... would you?
The Lexus has been on my mind for a while now. I have never been a fan of Japanese vehicles but this one gets me, can't get it off my mind for some reason. Everyone thinks I'm crazy. I wanted more torque plus I wanna try out a 4-door for a change. The thought of how it will never break down gets me too. Are these cars really that reliable? My first beamer needed a new tranny when it had just gotten out of warranty. It cost me around 6k. I was just curious what other M owners would say. Cheers
__________________
|
07-22-2012, 03:01 PM | #2 |
Major General
1901
Rep 5,678
Posts |
I would take a C63 over the IS-F personally if you want more torque than what the M3 offers. I would keep the M3 though unless you really wanted to try something different. At this level, the differences are small and based on personal preference. If you don't ever track your car then the extra torque is damn fun on the street though
I also suspect Lexus will come out with a new gen car soon so if it is something you are interested in, it might be worth waiting to see what is coming. Maybe they won't go TT 6 cylinder like BMW/MB are going to do
__________________
2020 X3 M40i | Black | Current DD
2020 C8 Corvette | Z51 | Torch Red ... built and waiting for delivery 2016 M2 | Long Beach Blue | 6MT 2015 M4 | Austin Yellow | DCT 2012 MB C63AMG | 2011 E92 M3 | 2010 E92 M3 |
Appreciate
0
|
07-22-2012, 03:09 PM | #3 |
Lieutenant
38
Rep 543
Posts |
While I like the Lexus brand, I think the IS-F's fit and finish is quite cheap and the transmission is not nearly as much fun as the DC-T. The engine is nice though....
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-22-2012, 04:27 PM | #5 |
Female driving enthusiast :P
76
Rep 2,308
Posts
Drives: Bimmer
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Ontario, Canada
|
I think your previous experience with a BMW out of warranty is having an impact. Nothing wrong with that.
Go try an IS-F. While Lexus tend to have high reliability, don't get it just for that, if it doesn't really excite you. My 2 cents. Since this generation of M3 has so far been pretty reliable and you could always end up with an odd-ball unreliable Lexus.
__________________
2013 M3 coupe (Azurite Black, Black, Piano Black)
+ miata nut (2 miatas) + Mk6 GTI 5-door hatch (our mini-SUV ) |
Appreciate
0
|
07-22-2012, 04:30 PM | #6 | |
Banned
43
Rep 2,406
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-22-2012, 04:38 PM | #7 |
Enlisted Member
8
Rep 45
Posts |
I drove both before getting the m. If reliability trumped everything else, get the isf. However, I never thought about an isf once I got the m. I suggest trading for an m in warranty or cpo coverage.
__________________
2011 SSII M3 Coupe/Competition Package/DCT
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-22-2012, 04:42 PM | #8 |
Private First Class
9
Rep 124
Posts |
I actually drove the IS-F and C63 back to back. I liked the C63, the sound and torque was definitely there. But the back seats were very uncomfortable. I drove a 4 door also and the m3 seats way were more comfy, front and back. The C63 was a little too race orientated and less of a daily driver it seemed. The lexus was all around really nice, dual personalities and its leather was nice and soft like my range. If I find one, I'll probably pull the trigger, give the Jap's a shot. Honestly, I just want something different. Everyone in my areas got M3's and C63's, but no ones got the IS-f? Maybe for a reason... Lol
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-22-2012, 05:43 PM | #9 | |
Id rather be boating...
66
Rep 1,097
Posts |
Quote:
I test drove 3 different ISF's and was soooooo close to pulling the trigger, but jumped on the ///M band wagon last minute. I think you'd be happy with the F. Its a great looking car, big power, and an interior way nicer than an M3 ever dreamed about being. DO IT!!!! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-22-2012, 06:14 PM | #10 |
Major
431
Rep 1,428
Posts |
I think the interior of the IS-F looks better but it's CF accents looks cheap. I'd have to come across a serious deal on an IS-F to consider it.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-22-2012, 06:27 PM | #11 |
Major
1007
Rep 1,477
Posts |
I know looks and style is subjective, but I was very disappointed in the interior of the IS-F. The center stack seemed like any other Toyota from years ago. I hated the gated shifter. The digital clock on the lower left of the center stack looked just like the one in my dads Chrysler from the mid 80s. The ride and power were excellent but 8 gears just felt like too many on a sports sedan when driving in manual mode. The IS has been out an awfully long time now as well, though the exterior has aged very, very well.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-22-2012, 06:45 PM | #12 |
First Lieutenant
11
Rep 393
Posts |
Top Gear reviewed compared the ISF to the m3...
http://www.topgear.com/uk/videos/m3-vs-isf For what it's worth and if I remember correctly... Clarkson says the torque in the ISF isn't available unless you are in the high rev range. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-22-2012, 09:35 PM | #13 |
Captain
39
Rep 726
Posts |
NICK: I agree... lol... that digital clock reminded me of my dad's 87 Supra! I swear it's the same one!
I did go from M3 to ISF... ISF has WAY more TQ... and is the better DD... M3 is a beast... and a great car... but so is ISF... And we all know what a BMW is like once it has 50K on it... whereas the LEXUS won't see the dealer till 100K+++ The M3 for me, was way to 'peaky' for the rpm driving day to day... i liked being able to 'lug' my ISF and still have solid acceleration, whereas the M3 needs to be above 5K to really do anything. The ISF is the better 'all around' car... the M3 the better 'purpose built' car IMO. The ISF once equipped with same size tires is better balanced on the road course too... but with oem size tires... can push much easier than the M3 at the limits. I ran my ISF at Auto Club Speedway in Cali... and smoked all the other E9X M3 best track times still to this day... 6 piston front brembos are no joke. For the reliability... if you're choosing a 40K mileage + car... the ISF should be the clear choice. If you choosing brand new... and plan to sell in 2 or 3 years... nothing wrong with an M3... and I still miss mine. Dave
__________________
2010 ZR1 3ZR Wht/Blk 10.7 @ 132
2011 C63 AMG P31 Car Blk/Blk 11.8 @ 117 2010 Nissan GT-R 10.8 @ 129 (Sold) 2008 Lexus IS-F (Sold) 12.5 @ 113 / 2008 Shelby GT500 (Sold) 11.3 @ 126 2008 e90 M3 6MT 12.8 @ 111 (Sold) / 2006 e60 M5 12.4 @ 114 (Sold) |
Appreciate
0
|
07-22-2012, 10:13 PM | #14 |
Captain
50
Rep 873
Posts |
I was going to get my dad in an 11' ISF but I can't possibly do it when there's a C63 available. The Lexus is a cool car, don't get me wrong we were going to purchase one but the interior just reeks of cut corners.
People may say the M3 interior is "plain" or boring but at least it is more functional and can be optioned in several beautiful different combinations. I was very upset to see the Lexus couldn't even hold a candle to the 63 in terms of this or the M3 for that matter. In terms of a daily driver it's all about what you want. It's a "better" daily driver, sure if you prefer a slush box. The ISF peaks torque high, so it's not like it's some AMG car which truly does pack a mega punch. The E9x does lack torque, but it'll loft around at low RPM just fine
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-22-2012, 10:22 PM | #15 |
Captain
39
Rep 726
Posts |
Onurleft... the C63 is definitely the 'king' in the TQ area... but is slowest around any roadcourse... much heavier than both... and get's horrible gas mileage.
My M3 would get 19 MPG.. ISF 20-21MPG... Seems as though most C63 are lucky to get 16MPG... for a DD that's tough. You are right 'better' is completely up to the owner, as so many different wants/needs. None of these would be a 'bad' choice! Peace, Dave
__________________
2010 ZR1 3ZR Wht/Blk 10.7 @ 132
2011 C63 AMG P31 Car Blk/Blk 11.8 @ 117 2010 Nissan GT-R 10.8 @ 129 (Sold) 2008 Lexus IS-F (Sold) 12.5 @ 113 / 2008 Shelby GT500 (Sold) 11.3 @ 126 2008 e90 M3 6MT 12.8 @ 111 (Sold) / 2006 e60 M5 12.4 @ 114 (Sold) |
Appreciate
0
|
07-23-2012, 04:48 AM | #17 |
Major General
1901
Rep 5,678
Posts |
?? Not the 'Ring... C63 bests the M3 and ISF there. I agree with your gas mileage comments though, it is a bit of a gas pig.
__________________
2020 X3 M40i | Black | Current DD
2020 C8 Corvette | Z51 | Torch Red ... built and waiting for delivery 2016 M2 | Long Beach Blue | 6MT 2015 M4 | Austin Yellow | DCT 2012 MB C63AMG | 2011 E92 M3 | 2010 E92 M3 Last edited by gthal; 07-23-2012 at 05:30 AM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
07-23-2012, 04:57 AM | #18 |
Major
142
Rep 1,440
Posts |
For someone who used to lament the lack of torque down low in the M3, i can tell u that u will miss the power delivery after u move on to a torque monster. I am glad i kept my M3 after getting the M5. While instant torque is addictive, it does not render the race to the redline obsolete. I realized that i appreciate the M3 more these days. Try to keep the M3 around if u can
__________________
- Frozen Grey F10 M5 DCT
- Rosso Corsa 458 Speciale Sold - Frozen Grey E92 M3 Sold |
Appreciate
0
|
07-23-2012, 11:34 AM | #21 | |
Captain
205
Rep 729
Posts |
Quote:
But then again, my M3 does not need new rear tires every 5,000 miles. The IS-F is an excellent compromise between the M3 and C63 and will most likely prove quite a bit more reliable than those cars. Only major drawbacks that I see are the smallish interior (would be better without a sunroof) and the 8-speed tranny (one too many gears). |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-23-2012, 12:19 PM | #22 |
Private First Class
21
Rep 135
Posts |
I went from ISF to 6sp e92 M3, and I never looked back. The only reason being I missed a manual car, otherwise I had 0 complaints about the ISF! Give it a shot, if you don't like it trade it in... resale is kick ass, good luck!
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|