|
|
12-16-2017, 02:25 PM | #1 |
Captain
567
Rep 801
Posts |
Rod Bearings / 13,900 Miles
Here are the first four. Kind of regretting not getting the BE Bolts. I had forgotten how tedious torque/release/torque/release/torque gets.
__________________
2011.75 E90 M3 | 2006 GMC Sierra LBZ | 2004 X5 3.0i 6MT | 1995 M3 S50B32 | 1990 325is | 1989 M3 S54B32
Hers: 1996 911 Turbo | 1989 325iX |
12-16-2017, 02:46 PM | #2 |
Lieutenant
175
Rep 450
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-16-2017, 03:30 PM | #5 |
Captain
567
Rep 801
Posts |
Yep. BE Bearings going in. At least I'm doing this on an engine stand.
Also, FYI, the Gear Wrench 80588 set, which seems to be stocked at Advance Auto Parts, gives you the 6" torx sockets needed to pull the oil pan.
__________________
2011.75 E90 M3 | 2006 GMC Sierra LBZ | 2004 X5 3.0i 6MT | 1995 M3 S50B32 | 1990 325is | 1989 M3 S54B32
Hers: 1996 911 Turbo | 1989 325iX |
Appreciate
2
CSBM52716.50 thetastelingers4169.00 |
12-16-2017, 05:03 PM | #7 |
Captain
567
Rep 801
Posts |
The remaining half.
Hardest part was getting the engine flipped back over. This thing is top heavy!
__________________
2011.75 E90 M3 | 2006 GMC Sierra LBZ | 2004 X5 3.0i 6MT | 1995 M3 S50B32 | 1990 325is | 1989 M3 S54B32
Hers: 1996 911 Turbo | 1989 325iX |
Appreciate
0
|
12-16-2017, 06:06 PM | #8 |
Second Lieutenant
245
Rep 256
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-16-2017, 08:50 PM | #9 |
Captain
567
Rep 801
Posts |
I’m prepping a 13.9k mile engine to go in next weekend. I’ll tear down the old engine once it’s out.
__________________
2011.75 E90 M3 | 2006 GMC Sierra LBZ | 2004 X5 3.0i 6MT | 1995 M3 S50B32 | 1990 325is | 1989 M3 S54B32
Hers: 1996 911 Turbo | 1989 325iX |
Appreciate
0
|
12-16-2017, 08:55 PM | #10 |
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
3749
Rep 2,907
Posts
Drives: 2011 E93 M3
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: DFW, Texas
|
The point of the BE ARP bolts is to limit the bore distortion that can occur with the OEM bolts. It's not for ease of assembly- that's just a bonus. Excessive bore distortion plays a part in the premature wear of the bearings.
|
12-16-2017, 09:35 PM | #11 |
Retired Curmudgeon
2985
Rep 4,047
Posts |
Those bearings look as bad as mine did at 2x the miles.
__________________
'19 X3 M40 Carbon Black/Oyster, '23 Jeep Grand Cherokee L Summit, Past BMWs: '18 M550i, '18 330 GT, '16 X5 40e, '11 E90M3, '06 X5 4.4, '03 330i ZHP, '02 M3, '97 Z3 2.8, '95 M3 (2x), '94 530i (manual), '92 525i (manual), '88 M3, '87 325iS |
Appreciate
2
K-M390.50 Flying Ace4984.50 |
12-17-2017, 09:02 AM | #12 |
BMW Veteran
310
Rep 503
Posts |
Pretty amazing how bad they look given the mileage. Have you reliably confirmed the mileage on the engine somehow? Seeing these makes me think i should look at doing mine with 43K miles.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-17-2017, 09:07 AM | #13 |
Captain
567
Rep 801
Posts |
I saw the donor car (and actually pulled a few extra parts off) and have a carfax. The engine is also *extremely* clean.
__________________
2011.75 E90 M3 | 2006 GMC Sierra LBZ | 2004 X5 3.0i 6MT | 1995 M3 S50B32 | 1990 325is | 1989 M3 S54B32
Hers: 1996 911 Turbo | 1989 325iX |
Appreciate
1
///M Power-Belgium63071.00 |
12-17-2017, 10:21 AM | #14 |
Brigadier General
4450
Rep 4,014
Posts |
Put them in an envelope with the documentation showing they are off of a 14,000 mile motor and mail them to BMW with a note inside that says "please open at the next shareholders meeting".
|
Appreciate
7
///M Power-Belgium63071.00 Ngilbe361618.50 L4ces337.00 Maxf80M3174.00 M_Three90.00 Flying Ace4984.50 94jedi829.00 |
12-17-2017, 11:39 AM | #15 | |
General
63071
Rep 24,609
Posts |
Quote:
In 2013 BMW had to replace four 2013's . S65's with minus 15K miles on it and under BMW warranty ! One of the four was only a few months old and the owner had barely 6K miles on it ! Once the engine was replaced by BMW he dumped the car , and lost 40% value ...
__________________
"MAX VERSTAPPEN" IS THE 2021+2022+2023 F1 WORLD CHAMPION - #UnLeashTheLion
BPM DEV-Tune & DCT Software-Tune & Servotronic & coding ///Alpine HID Angeleyes ///Oem.exhaust mod. |
|
12-17-2017, 06:17 PM | #16 |
BMW Veteran
310
Rep 503
Posts |
Well i can't say I'm not disappointed. I was honestly expecting minimal wear based on your description of the donor. Has anyone else pulled sub 30k mile bearings? If so, how did they look? That thread in the engine section is too long to navigate quickly.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-17-2017, 09:37 PM | #17 | |
Colonel
2619
Rep 2,138
Posts
Drives: 2011 E92 M3
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Victoria
|
Quote:
Still some wear but better. These are copper lead type.
__________________
2011 E92 M3 - 6MT, ZCP, ZF LSD, ESS G1, Some other goodies... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-18-2017, 06:38 AM | #18 |
Second Lieutenant
245
Rep 256
Posts |
Quote:
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-18-2017, 12:45 PM | #19 | |
BMW Veteran
310
Rep 503
Posts |
Quote:
so are we still to believe tolerance stack is the compounding cause for these wear patterns, along with less than ideal bearing clearance? Could it be that factory assembly of the connecting rods (i.e. torquing of the rod bolts, specifically) was done improperly on some cars? I mean tolerances are typically engineered to ensure that even under max stack one way or another, the end result is still acceptable. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-18-2017, 12:49 PM | #20 |
Captain
113
Rep 915
Posts |
So did 99% of the purchasers.
__________________
Kiss French, Drive German, and Ride Italian....
|
Appreciate
2
spiderspider312.00 M_Three90.00 |
12-18-2017, 01:06 PM | #21 |
Second Lieutenant
245
Rep 256
Posts |
If you say so, the fact that so many appear as bad as they do leads me to think the fails are more than just a fluke.
|
Appreciate
1
///M Power-Belgium63071.00 |
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|