|
|
09-27-2008, 11:54 PM | #1 |
NASA/PDA Instructor
21
Rep 284
Posts |
Ram air on the M...a waste?
So I took apart the airbox looking for some 'free' ways to increase flow. While the top of the box was off, I really considered the design and have some doubts about the efficiency of the 'ram' effect with the stock box and with the aftermarket scoops. I love the lower scoop (fog-light location) and the intake at the kidney grills, surely they will allow some 'ram' effect but the top opening...the driver's side nostril, I believe, is the problem.
My thought is that the driver's side hood nostril will let any additional ram air pressure out of the box. I don't see that opening creating any positive pressure for the intake, just another place for air to be ingested at high rpm. I really wonder if the hood nostril inlet was closed-off that airbox pressure would be higher at higher speeds. Your thoughts?
__________________
"Arcadian, I've fought countless times, yet I've never met an adversary who could offer me what we Spartans call "A Beautiful Death." I can only hope, with all the world's warriors gathered against us, there might be one down there who's up to the task."Μολὼν λαβέ!! |
09-28-2008, 06:36 AM | #3 |
Major
110
Rep 1,311
Posts |
I'd guess it would be best if a BMW engineer that designed the air box could comment on why they designed it as such. But I think and this is comming from my turbine technical back ground. Massive airflow injested will create high pressure as we all know. But for example, when the turbine engines are starting up, decelerating, and at lower rpm's the compressors have to "bleed" off some of the air that is originally injested from the intake. Only at higher rpm % do the bleed off valves close to allow full consumption of the airflow. So I'm thinking that the concept is the same here where at lower speeds/rpm's the air is allowed to flow without being backed up in a closed airbox. at high speed/rpm's where the engine needs all the air it can get, the airbox probebly allows the max air flow by creating a vacuum at the hood opening by suction. I don't think the M3 airbox was designed to gather air and compress it but to allow the maximum airflow across the filter. Just my technical guess but I cold be wrong. Maybe on a dyno one should seal it off and see what happens.
I do wonder why BMW built to inlet scoops and two opening at the hood although one is functional. I know there is a V10 M5 kit and the engine uses both air scoops/hood outlets but I wonder if BMW have another idea down the road?? |
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2008, 08:40 AM | #4 |
Banned
85
Rep 3,384
Posts |
The top nostril or vent, the drivers side in particular, is actually a vent. I noticed this one day when a leaf got sucked into the lower intake and with the way it was stuck I realized that it's simply a vent and not another intake
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2008, 09:07 AM | #5 | |
Major General
374
Rep 8,033
Posts |
Quote:
I sounds like for whatever reason the single functional hood opening gave them what they were after. Making the other one functional as well might have produced undesired results.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2008, 12:51 PM | #6 |
NASA/PDA Instructor
21
Rep 284
Posts |
I suspect that what you feel is the cool air making the difference, if it were the scoops then you'd feel it all the time.
So it's raining a bit here in NY today and I took the car out. I noticed that any water surrounding/on top of the hood nostril was forced up/out of the opening, as there seems to be decent positive pressure from the box whilst at speed. It stands to reason that the grill-scoops would help combat any negative pressure created at high rpm/load but I have a suspicion that they would work better if there wasn't a "leak" out the hood. I feel that the scoops are not so much a 'ram-effect', adding power, but work by reducing the vacuum of the airbox at high rpm/loads. I would think that the best "intake-mod" for the car would be a scoop (something similar to an STI's hood scoop...obviously much smaller or a NACA duct which would be much more visually appealing IMHO) that would allow the hood nostril to actually function as a positive pressure influence on the box, instead of a negative pressure producer as itsits now. Even a small lip at the rear of the opening would help reduce the vacuum-effect. Now where did I put that fiberglass and resin...
__________________
"Arcadian, I've fought countless times, yet I've never met an adversary who could offer me what we Spartans call "A Beautiful Death." I can only hope, with all the world's warriors gathered against us, there might be one down there who's up to the task."Μολὼν λαβέ!! |
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2008, 02:58 PM | #7 | |
Colonel
253
Rep 2,091
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
2012 Audi R8 V10TT| 6MT| Suzuka Grey
2015 Ferrari 458 Speciale| Rosso Scuderia 2020 BMW X7| Mineral White 2024 718 GT4 RS | Arctic Grey |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2008, 05:21 PM | #8 | |
Banned
78
Rep 2,244
Posts |
Quote:
I feel more of a difference when it cools down with the scoops and filter than I did without them. The scoops aren't really a low end mod they really kick in at freeway speeds. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2008, 05:24 PM | #9 | |
Moderator
94
Rep 1,920
Posts |
Quote:
Under full load, who knows....maybe it sucks a bit from the hood vent. I dunno.., However, the idea of "pressurizing" the intake track is a joke if there is an opening in a lower pressure area (the hood vent). You may be able to hold a slightly higher than nominal pressure in the intake track, but with that hood vent open, I doubt you could even measure it. Now, block off the hood vent and I bet you would see some pressure in there. It would be a worthy experiement for somebody that has the equipment. I wish I did, I would try it.
__________________
Tim <--- apparently likes "3" cars
2014 E63S -- The Rocket 2014 F30 328i -- Kids car 2008 E90 M3 -- Sold 2004 GT3 -- Sold 1997 M3/4 -- Sold 1995 M3 -- Sold |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2008, 05:26 PM | #10 | |
NASA/PDA Instructor
21
Rep 284
Posts |
Quote:
I suspect that the engineers that you so fondly speak of had to incorporate those hood nostrils on the car for visual purposes, as it is one of them are faux. I've been around the block enough times to know that a hole in an airbox is not optimal. Thanks for your thoughts, though.
__________________
"Arcadian, I've fought countless times, yet I've never met an adversary who could offer me what we Spartans call "A Beautiful Death." I can only hope, with all the world's warriors gathered against us, there might be one down there who's up to the task."Μολὼν λαβέ!! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2008, 05:30 PM | #11 | |
Moderator
94
Rep 1,920
Posts |
Quote:
If you installed a one-way valve (or louver!), the car could suck air through the hood vent if it needed to. But when the ram effect of the two front intakes (or scoops) starts to have a positive pressure effect on the intake tract, the louvers would not allow that air to escape through the hood vent. I would be interested to see your pressure data when you get around to it. It would be interesting to see a baseline (stock), one with stock config but with scoops, one with stock config but with hood vent blocked, and one with scoops and hood blocked. I bet if one way louvers or something similar was intalled on the hood, you would see a larger pressure gradient in the intake tract at speed. The scoops may add to it. That would be a good way to see what the hood vent does at speed, and what the scoops do also (in stock form and with blocked (or in effect, louvered) hood vent). Worth a shot. BTW, copyright on the louvered one-way hood vent idea!
__________________
Tim <--- apparently likes "3" cars
2014 E63S -- The Rocket 2014 F30 328i -- Kids car 2008 E90 M3 -- Sold 2004 GT3 -- Sold 1997 M3/4 -- Sold 1995 M3 -- Sold |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2008, 06:11 PM | #12 | |
NASA/PDA Instructor
21
Rep 284
Posts |
Quote:
Great idea, though, and if it could be hidden under the nostril it should...in theory...work to great effect.
__________________
"Arcadian, I've fought countless times, yet I've never met an adversary who could offer me what we Spartans call "A Beautiful Death." I can only hope, with all the world's warriors gathered against us, there might be one down there who's up to the task."Μολὼν λαβέ!! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2008, 07:26 PM | #13 | |
Major General
374
Rep 8,033
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2008, 07:48 PM | #14 | |
Colonel
219
Rep 2,339
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2008, 09:40 PM | #15 |
First Lieutenant
21
Rep 362
Posts |
As Pencil stated earlier in the thread, he observed a vacuum at the top vent under full engine load. So, it appears to serve a purpose to support top end CFM requirements.
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-28-2008, 10:04 PM | #16 |
Major General
374
Rep 8,033
Posts |
That's for a stationary vehicle (with some artifical airflow directed at the front it sounds like). We don't really know what happens in a real situation at high speeds when the front facing intake really begins to influence the dynamics.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
09-29-2008, 10:53 AM | #18 | |
Moderator
94
Rep 1,920
Posts |
Quote:
I speculate that it is of benefit at low speed only. Once the car reaches a given velocity, the ram effect of the front lower intake prolly supplies more than enough air. Being as the hood vent is in a relative low pressure area, I would think it "leaks" air at speed. Again, just speculation. I look forward to the test data. Interesting note from a previous poster about the Audi system. Seems like he need something similar. I was thinking a simply "louver" system would work fine. Of course, given the system would pressurize (per se) if the hood vent was closed. Let the testing begin! I wish my car was not in the shop...I would monkey around with it and start to prototype something up....just for the hell of it.
__________________
Tim <--- apparently likes "3" cars
2014 E63S -- The Rocket 2014 F30 328i -- Kids car 2008 E90 M3 -- Sold 2004 GT3 -- Sold 1997 M3/4 -- Sold 1995 M3 -- Sold |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-23-2008, 02:26 PM | #19 | |
NASA/PDA Instructor
21
Rep 284
Posts |
Quote:
Ever monkey around with that louver? I may try to apply a flapper...like what's used on an inside/outside exhaust duct on the inside of the airbox, where the hood vent meets the airbox to achieve that "one-way" valve. Or a rubber plate to cover the hole and have smaller flappers...or louvers...cut into it. Be good, TomK
__________________
"Arcadian, I've fought countless times, yet I've never met an adversary who could offer me what we Spartans call "A Beautiful Death." I can only hope, with all the world's warriors gathered against us, there might be one down there who's up to the task."Μολὼν λαβέ!! |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-23-2008, 08:18 PM | #20 |
Lieutenant General
304
Rep 13,114
Posts |
this maybe stupid
but..... since it can get very hot in there, the cold air will get hot so it constantly flushes the system to insure that there's only cold air getting fed to the engine? maybe?
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-23-2008, 08:35 PM | #21 |
NASA/PDA Instructor
21
Rep 284
Posts |
not stupid at all, shows you're thinking...good point and it could be valid...
__________________
"Arcadian, I've fought countless times, yet I've never met an adversary who could offer me what we Spartans call "A Beautiful Death." I can only hope, with all the world's warriors gathered against us, there might be one down there who's up to the task."Μολὼν λαβέ!! |
Appreciate
0
|
10-23-2008, 09:21 PM | #22 |
chris
278
Rep 12,144
Posts |
yes i was thinking this too.. i think you may be right the vent is to let the hot air out and ensure that the air box always has a good amount of cooler air in it. definitely a valid point.
__________________
Current: 2013 F10 M5 & 2016 Mini JCW 2013 GLK350 (gone), 997.1 GT3RS (gone), 2009 WRX STI (gone), e92 M3 (gone) |
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|