BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > E90/E92 M3 Technical Topics > Engine, Transmission, Exhaust, Drivetrain, ECU Software Modifications
 
European Auto Source (EAS)
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      09-19-2015, 07:54 PM   #1
M3Frank888
Enlisted Member
M3Frank888's Avatar
7
Rep
49
Posts

Drives: 2013 M3 e92
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: NYC

iTrader: (1)

Talking Got my ARH Headers X-pipe installed!

Recently got my ARH Header X-pipe installed

ARH Headers Ceramic Coated
X-Pipe w/ High flow Cats and Resonators

Feel the car can really breathe a lot better especially during the power bands at any gear 4k-8.4k of m3 e92. Really feel and hear the exhaust gas pass thru fast freely. I also noticed with the swain tech ceramic coating I dont feel as much heat coming out of the engine compartment.

Dyno
I gained 19-20rwhp and about 10-12tq
M3 e92 Stock w/ afe intake.

Going to get car tuned and see what numbers I get.

- Frank
Appreciate 0
      09-19-2015, 07:56 PM   #2
Dave07997S
Brigadier General
720
Rep
3,964
Posts

Drives: 2020 Ford Mustang GT
Join Date: May 2009
Location: El Segundo, CA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by M3Frank888 View Post
Recently got my ARH Header X-pipe installed

ARH Headers Ceramic Coated
X-Pipe w/ High flow Cats and Resonators

Feel the car can really breathe a lot better especially during the power bands at any gear 4k-8.4k of m3 e92. Really feel and hear the exhaust gas pass thru fast freely. I also noticed with the swain tech ceramic coating I dont feel as much heat coming out of the engine compartment.

Dyno
I gained 19-20rwhp and about 10-12tq
M3 e92 Stock w/ afe intake.

Going to get car tuned and see what numbers I get.

- Frank
Thanks Frank for reporting in...

Those numbers are pretty much in line what the car would pick up with test pipes.

Dave
__________________
2020 Ford Mustang GT 6MT PP1 444rwhp
(Sold)2013 M3 Coupe-MR/BLK ZCP, 2011 M3 Coupe-MR/Blk
2007 Porsche 997C2S Speed Yellow/Blk sport seats
2004 BMW M3 Imola/Blk
Appreciate 1
      09-20-2015, 11:17 AM   #3
8600RPM
Lieutenant Colonel
657
Rep
1,749
Posts

Drives: e92 m3
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: AZ

iTrader: (0)

I think it's clear now if your not supercharged, headers only make sense if you just love the sound over a regular catless xpipe. Otherwise you are looking at 15 to 20 whp gain either route. Sadly to me headers, as in the v10 s85, take an exotic engine note and make it a more deep American v8 sound
Appreciate 0
      09-20-2015, 11:32 AM   #4
Hujan
Brigadier General
Hujan's Avatar
United_States
569
Rep
3,742
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: .

iTrader: (16)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave07997S View Post
Thanks Frank for reporting in...

Those numbers are pretty much in line what the car would pick up with test pipes.

Dave
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8600RPM View Post
I think it's clear now if your not supercharged, headers only make sense if you just love the sound over a regular catless xpipe. Otherwise you are looking at 15 to 20 whp gain either route. Sadly to me headers, as in the v10 s85, take an exotic engine note and make it a more deep American v8 sound


The abrupt disappearance of ARH confirms to me that the proof was not in the pudding. It would have been very easy to dyno their system against, say, the Dinan midpipe to show their system's gains over an already-catless car. Their systems would have sold like hotcakes. That proof never came and ARH seems to have disappeared.

Anyone looking to replicate the gains, even supercharged people, could probably get there with an MRF-style x-pipe for much less money.
Appreciate 0
      09-20-2015, 04:12 PM   #5
cenix
Captain
cenix's Avatar
United_States
379
Rep
875
Posts

Drives: E90 M3 ZCP
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: SoCal

iTrader: (5)

I was following all the ARH threads too, and don't recall ever seeing a straight honest to goodness dyno plot/graph on the headers for NA. Really didn't make sense to me that a manufacturer of any performance product wouldn't want to spend the relatively small amount of money to substantiate and validate their product. Sales would be brisk for sure.
Appreciate 0
      09-20-2015, 07:15 PM   #6
thgem72
New Member
9
Rep
23
Posts

Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Denver

iTrader: (0)

What I would have liked to have seen is area under the curve. Max HP is great, for example, part of the benefit of a stroker is where you live every day in addition to absolute power. Simplifying everything to one number is misleading. However, I agree that ARH has fallen short in not providing ANY real world support for their product.
Appreciate 0
      09-20-2015, 08:51 PM   #7
Dave07997S
Brigadier General
720
Rep
3,964
Posts

Drives: 2020 Ford Mustang GT
Join Date: May 2009
Location: El Segundo, CA

iTrader: (1)

This issue is also.showing up in the Mustang world.as well. People.only dyno at best 10rwhp over cat deletes. Just isnt worth the money nor the effort.
Appreciate 0
      09-20-2015, 09:00 PM   #8
M3SQRD
Major General
M3SQRD's Avatar
2145
Rep
5,528
Posts

Drives: E92 M3,G20 330ix,F22 240iX,F82
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Mid-Atlantic

iTrader: (11)

Quote:
Originally Posted by cenix View Post
I was following all the ARH threads too, and don't recall ever seeing a straight honest to goodness dyno plot/graph on the headers for NA. Really didn't make sense to me that a manufacturer of any performance product wouldn't want to spend the relatively small amount of money to substantiate and validate their product. Sales would be brisk for sure.
+1

Wasn't ARH 'guaranteeing' their (headers + x-pipe) system would produce 25-30 WHP over a 100% stock e9x M3?
Appreciate 0
      09-20-2015, 09:09 PM   #9
Nick ARH
Banned
51
Rep
128
Posts

Drives: e92 M3
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Deer Park

iTrader: (0)

Didn't disappear guys. I've been tied up with multiple projects including two huge corvette shows.
Frank thanks for posting. I'd love if you posted your graphs to show forum members the results across the board. I expect, based on recent testing done at Powerhaus Performance that you'll be up around 30 wheel with tuning. Thanks so much for choosing ARH. Enjoy!

Nick
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2015, 12:01 AM   #10
8600RPM
Lieutenant Colonel
657
Rep
1,749
Posts

Drives: e92 m3
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: AZ

iTrader: (0)

30 whp with tuning is the same as any catless setup so again, these headers add no extra power and once again reinforces why every header company over the years never make it with people buying product as factory e92 m3 headers are as good,as it gets for naturally aspirated, high rpm band power
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2015, 08:07 AM   #11
oolas3
Captain
388
Rep
876
Posts

Drives: BMW
Join Date: May 2015
Location: United States

iTrader: (0)

Get test pipes with a tune and call it done.
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2015, 09:25 AM   #12
squartus
Major
United_States
314
Rep
1,017
Posts

Drives: 2010 E92 M3 6MT
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Mississippi

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2010 E92 BMW M3  [10.00]
Yep same thing that has been said all along, get test pipes and a tune. Use the money you saved to buy some nice volk wheels or something.
__________________


4.4L LC stroker/ESS VT2-625/Volk te37 sl's/AA exhaust/DSS Carbon Fiber driveshaft/ARH Headers.. etc
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2015, 10:55 AM   #13
MFL
Major
MFL's Avatar
174
Rep
1,246
Posts

Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Bellevue, WA

iTrader: (3)

Garage List
2010 BMW M3  [9.00]
Fuck it. Lol.

*drops mic*.
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2015, 12:19 PM   #14
ilikebmxbikes
Banned
1518
Rep
4,744
Posts

Drives: S65 1M Clone & E92 M3 4.6L
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: San Francisco

iTrader: (42)

Garage List
i do believe these headers provide additional over a standard NA fbo e9x. I am betting it is 5-10whp.

To some people 5-10whp would be a good gain and to others it wouldn't. Arguing worth is pointless. Some guys on here spend $8k on wheels while some buy cheap $1k gravity cast wheel sets... we all have different situations and priorities.
Appreciate 1
      09-21-2015, 12:36 PM   #15
Leonardo629
Lieutenant Colonel
Taiwan
168
Rep
1,792
Posts

Drives: 2013 M3 Coupe
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Taiwan

iTrader: (10)

So we learn the header is useless, again....
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2015, 12:50 PM   #16
whats77inaname
Banned
United_States
825
Rep
3,387
Posts

Drives: when at all possible
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Tx

iTrader: (25)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Leonardo629 View Post
So we learn the header is useless, again....
I would say that the gains are definitely more pronounced for s/c'ed cars vs n/a cars.
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2015, 01:06 PM   #17
8600RPM
Lieutenant Colonel
657
Rep
1,749
Posts

Drives: e92 m3
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: AZ

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ilikebmxbikes View Post
i do believe these headers provide additional over a standard NA fbo e9x. I am betting it is 5-10whp.

To some people 5-10whp would be a good gain and to others it wouldn't. Arguing worth is pointless. Some guys on here spend $8k on wheels while some buy cheap $1k gravity cast wheel sets... we all have different situations and priorities.
Based on what? 20 whp is standard for catless xpipe gains.30 with a,tune.
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2015, 01:19 PM   #18
ilikebmxbikes
Banned
1518
Rep
4,744
Posts

Drives: S65 1M Clone & E92 M3 4.6L
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: San Francisco

iTrader: (42)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8600RPM View Post
Based on what? 20 whp is standard for catless xpipe gains.30 with a,tune.
based on bimmerworlds header/x pipe results
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2015, 01:55 PM   #19
8600RPM
Lieutenant Colonel
657
Rep
1,749
Posts

Drives: e92 m3
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: AZ

iTrader: (0)

Which are compared to a catless xpipe or test pipe? Their headers also use a catless xpipe so again there is no data that exists out there to answer the question
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2015, 01:58 PM   #20
ilikebmxbikes
Banned
1518
Rep
4,744
Posts

Drives: S65 1M Clone & E92 M3 4.6L
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: San Francisco

iTrader: (42)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8600RPM View Post
Which are compared to a catless xpipe or test pipe? Their headers also use a catless xpipe so again there is no data that exists out there to answer the question
here you go.

http://store.bimmerworld.com/bimmerw...px?Thread=True
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2015, 04:35 PM   #21
_M3
Private First Class
_M3's Avatar
20
Rep
163
Posts

Drives: E92 M
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: San Gabriel, CA

iTrader: (3)

I'd like to see what gains these headers/xpipe are making between 4-7k rpm over test pipes with a tune.
Appreciate 0
      09-21-2015, 10:58 PM   #22
Dave07997S
Brigadier General
720
Rep
3,964
Posts

Drives: 2020 Ford Mustang GT
Join Date: May 2009
Location: El Segundo, CA

iTrader: (1)

I'm not arguing that full length headers have some gain over just test pipes, I agree with this. Its just the cost of admission when you include the hassle of the install its not worth it IMHO, especially if you have to put the car back to stock to have it smogged every 2 years.

Dave
__________________
2020 Ford Mustang GT 6MT PP1 444rwhp
(Sold)2013 M3 Coupe-MR/BLK ZCP, 2011 M3 Coupe-MR/Blk
2007 Porsche 997C2S Speed Yellow/Blk sport seats
2004 BMW M3 Imola/Blk
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:39 PM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST