|
|
10-30-2009, 05:40 PM | #177 | |
Brigadier General
125
Rep 4,971
Posts |
Quote:
I dont think the previous gen CTSV was all that popular here. Honestly really dont see many. An 06 CTSV for example only fetches a few thousand more than its CTS counterpart with similar mileage etc. on the used lot. Very similar to the Jag S Type and S Type R. If you can find a used one, you typically dont pay that much more. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-30-2009, 06:36 PM | #178 |
Major
269
Rep 1,282
Posts |
The chicane was no doubt added to deep speeds down at the request of the lawyers (or Monticello instructors). The GM PR dept would have had a hard time explaining the rank amateur ex-customer in the balled up CTS-V at the end of the long straight.
__________________
M850i Vert with RaceChip
E46 M3, Euro Headers, Rasp Pipe, Kassel Tune Alpina B8, zero performance mods |
Appreciate
0
|
10-30-2009, 06:43 PM | #179 |
Resident Black Guy
251
Rep 2,302
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-30-2009, 06:44 PM | #180 |
Major General
817
Rep 7,887
Posts |
Here is video of some the goings on of the day.
[u2b]<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/2w0orC_kes0&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en& feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/2w0orC_kes0&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en& feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/u2b] |
Appreciate
0
|
10-30-2009, 06:57 PM | #181 |
O! So Sour!!
552
Rep 15,615
Posts
Drives: Fast 240z / Slow M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: 'Merica!
|
go mike!!!
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-30-2009, 07:07 PM | #182 |
Major General
817
Rep 7,887
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-30-2009, 07:11 PM | #183 |
Major
51
Rep 1,027
Posts |
m3 FTW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
08 - M3 Sparkling Graphite/blk leather/tech/6 speed
08 - 335i Sport/Prem/Auto White/Terra - AA Exhaust 07 Acura MDX Tech, 07 G35S /Nav |
Appreciate
0
|
10-30-2009, 07:19 PM | #184 |
Major
75
Rep 1,288
Posts |
Sounds like GM put on a great event and found the right drivers with the right attitude!
Mike, congrats - your skills made up for the M3's weaknesses vs a faster car with better brakes. In your opinion, is the CTS-V just as well balanced as the M3? I'm thinking the answer is yes... although perhaps the power makes it more intimidating to drive? But with seat time... well Chris, congrats on your first track day in your CTS-V, great post. There are car enthusiasts with every brand. BMW, GM, Audi, MB.... and as you experienced we can get along.... just ignore the punks on the net, they don't necessarily speak for the marque. The track is a great place to meet other "car people." I hope you get a chance to go again. Thanks for posting here.
__________________
2009 135i 6MT Euro Delivery 9/5/09
BMW Performance Power Kit - Exhaust - Short Shifter - Suspension |
Appreciate
0
|
10-30-2009, 08:01 PM | #185 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
334
Rep 1,991
Posts |
Quote:
Thanks for sharing and congrats
__________________
Gone but never forgotten:
e92 M3 l 6MT - OEM++ e46 M3 l 6MT - OEM+ e90 M3 l 6MT - OEM++ e92 335i l Auto - the list is too long... |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-30-2009, 08:26 PM | #187 | |
First Lieutenant
42
Rep 381
Posts |
Quote:
Coming from a c6z06, the power did not intimidate me at all. I just wasnt expecting it to be as quick as it was. I would say the cars are very pretty in balance, I think the m3 has a better balance coming into the corner and through a long corner, but the ctsv has a better balance off the corner. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-30-2009, 09:26 PM | #188 | |
Major
62
Rep 1,211
Posts |
So asking the question more directly, do you feel that if you had given your M3 to GM professional tester and former race car driver John Heinrichy, he would have turned in a substantially quicker lap than your's very close to the CTS-V??
Quote:
__________________
""A great sounding, responsive, high-revving, naturally aspirated engine is part of the DNA of a thoroughbred sports car. No two ways about it."
- Lamborghini on turbocharging |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-30-2009, 09:42 PM | #189 |
NASA SpecE30 Racer
82
Rep 1,307
Posts |
Okay I have read this entire thread. To me there are some points that should be made:
1. The challenge was to bring a production sedan and beat Bub Lutz in a CTS-V. 2. Michael Cooper in his E90 M3 was the only person to beat Bub Lutz and therefore WON the challenge. 3. The CTS-V is DEFINITELY a faster car than the M3. I'm proud to be an M3 owner and proud of Michael Cooper.
__________________
King Tut
2012 BMW M3 Individual: Sold lsb.ridedomain.com 1987 BMW 325is SpecE30: spece30.ridedomain.com 2009 BMW M3 Coupe: Sold e92.ridedomain.com |
Appreciate
0
|
10-30-2009, 10:51 PM | #190 | |
Major
27
Rep 1,314
Posts |
Quote:
No doubt that BMW's equivalent of Johnny O'Connell (the "mystery driver" who bested Henricy's time by 1 second with a 2:45) would be a bit closer. 5 seconds in 1 lap is an eternity on a short course like that one. I think some people are forgetting that the V's straight-line performance advantage was compromised by the chicane placed on the long straight by track management, which I'm sure GM didn't like, but was forced to accept. At any rate, this has been a very entertaining thread, which sure as hell beats reading about the latest bling wheels from Miami. If Michael were given the chance, he might well be good enough to challenge people like O'Connell some day. I very much enjoyed seeing the video with O'Connell complimenting him on "hitting his marks." He clearly has some serious talent. Good job Michael, and it's great that you joined the conversation.
__________________
Last edited by foosh; 10-31-2009 at 12:51 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-30-2009, 11:10 PM | #191 |
Major
240
Rep 1,247
Posts
Drives: E60 M5, E71 X6M, E46 M3
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: At the gas station
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2006 BMW E46 M3 'vert [0.00]
2008 BMW M5 [0.00] 2011 BMW E92 [0.00] 2012 BMW X6M [0.00] 2003 E46 M3 [0.00] |
__________________
Current: 2006 E46 M3 'vert 6-sp 2008 E60 M5, 2011 E92 328 6-sp, 2011 E70 N55, 2012 E71 X6M
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-31-2009, 12:35 AM | #193 | |
New Member
0
Rep 8
Posts |
Quote:
Thanks I just wanted to make sure you guys knew I was a fan of Mike. Actually everyone there was cool. It was just a ton of fun. The M5 guy has a great website. He sounds like an average suburban dad like me who just loves cars, but he's taken his hobby much further to actually reviewing cars. Sounds like he's driven tons of cool stuff. Mainly, I just wanted to sign my name to the posts. I can't stand people posting on these sites annonymously and making ridiculous claims and putting people down. If you can't sign your name to it, you are a coward. My buddy Dave and I drove 9 1/2 hours from Michigan to be there. We had this talk all the way home. We predicted exactly what the blogs would read. If you are a BMW fan, you say the challenge was Lutz and his CTSV against the world. If you are a Caddy fan, you say the challenge was the car against any car,(4 door stock) and any driver. If you were there, you would have heard Lutz conceed defeat before the competition even began. He knew there were at least 5 or 6 "whipper snappers" in the room who would best him. But he also knew they could not beat the car when put in capable hands. Before making another post claiming BMW victory, read the www.ctsvchallenge.com website. Never, ever, ever, does it claim that Lutz is the only CTS V driver. In fact it clearly states professional drivers will be on hand. All the talk is about John H being at the top, but fact is Aaron Link is also an amateur and he's near the top as well. Aaron is an engineer and does have lots of track time. Call him a ringer, maybe, but he's not a pro. Basically, I'm asking that you don't disqualify everyone above your guy until he's at number 1 and claim victory. I will sum up the leagal mumbo jumbo, unless you care to read the ten pages. It says, you don't have a chance, we set up the challenge and we can choose our competition and we can choose our drivers. By clicking the button below, and submitting your entry, you accept these terms. Mike accepted the terms, (actually he told me his brother signed him up). So don't accept the terms and later cry unfair. I'm not saying Mike is crying. In fact, at 21, he's been far more mature than a fair amount of posters here. I'm saying the posts claiming put this or that driver here or there or on this or that track and we win is just silly. You can talk "what if" all day long, but it's a waste of energy. Mike had a great day and I think everyone gave him his due and he deserves every minute of his 15 minutes of fame. Lutz wanted to accomplish one thing, and he said it in several interviews. To his credit, he did not want to run the race in a straight line because people already know americans can build a car to go straight. He wanted to prove Cadillac could make a car that could run with the euros who have been doing it for a hundred years or more. I think Bob did it and in the process got tons of free publicity. Mike also got some serious recognition and that is way cool. Cadillac hasn't ignored Mike, they gave him credit left and right. And Mike also gave Caddy credit, praising the V in some of his posts above. We can argue symantics all day long. Was the challenge Lutz vs. Mike? or Car vs. Car? But you cannot argue that everyone had a great time and there were some very cool cars going round the track that day. It seems like much more fun to talk about the stuff on the M5 forum like how cool the different cars sounded coming down the straight in front of the clubhouse. The caddys had a thunderous deep growl, while the bmers had a higher pitched throaty whine. The audi was a tighter tuned sound and the Jag was just like a quiet storm of smooth effortless power. Chris |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-31-2009, 03:16 AM | #194 | |
Banned
757
Rep 4,649
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-31-2009, 08:25 AM | #197 | |
Moderator
7515
Rep 19,368
Posts |
Quote:
Second, props to you for hiking it all the way to Monticello for this challenge. Definitely a chance of a lifetime to be involved with something like this. As far as your comment about everyone just getting along - I really think that pretty much people are. Actually, I am sort of proud of the enthusiast community at large for keeping things clean. Sure, there are a few fanboy-ish and hater comments in this thread, and probably some more in the other forums and blogs across the internet. But for the most part people are giving props where props are due - both to the drivers and their machinery. As for the CTS-V vs. the M3, well its no secret which is the faster car. But, you have to admit with less than four seconds between Michael and Heinricy, there wouldn't be much room for Heinricy to improve on Michael's time in an M3 without encroaching on his own CTS-V time. I think this has significance, and its worth talking about. You have to give the M3 some props for that, with its 10% disadvantage in power-to-weight. Sure there was the chicane. Sure four, three, two or even one second is still a lot of time on ~3 minute course. But the results are still a testament to the M3's abilities. And I think it's pretty fair to say that while GM obviously knew exactly what they were doing here, no one, not even Lutz, expected to see a 21 year old with an M3 come in and put up such a challenge like he did. I should add here that, as a corollary to that, if Michael had gotten an actual timed lap in CTS-V, there's little room for him to improve over his own time in his car without encroaching on Heinricy's as well. Huge props are due there as well. But definitely, at the same time, no one can deny that the CTS-V is a hell of a car also. No question. In fact, I am drooling over the upcoming CTS-V wagon myself because I would love to have one in the garage next to the M3. I am working on convincing the wife. But even if not the V, we may well end up with the standard CTS wagon. It's in the running for sure. There's bound to be some difference in opinions about how legitimate the whole thing was and who the real winners were. It's ok. Not everyone has to agree on everything, and its clear where everyone's biases are going to be. That said I think everyone involved - including all of us enthusiasts - have gotten more positive's than negatives out of this. It was a great event, and I hope that more events like this will follow. Cheers |
|
Appreciate
0
|
10-31-2009, 08:29 AM | #198 |
Second Lieutenant
200
Rep 257
Posts
Drives: F30 320 MSport, Estoril
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: UK
iTrader: (0)
Garage List 2013 320d M sport [0.00]
2003 E46 M3 [0.00] 2004 M3 [0.00] 2006 E90 320D MSPORT [0.00] 2005 E90 320i [0.00] |
Cad V logo
The Cadi V logo is such a rip off of the BM M logo.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|