|
|
04-09-2013, 01:28 PM | #67 |
Second Lieutenant
14
Rep 217
Posts |
My little nimble M roadster is fun for road course track days but 300whp just is not cutting it anymore LOL, been tossing around the idea of picking up an E92 M. Then again I could just throw an HPF turbo on the roadster and have a fun little go-kart.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-09-2013, 01:51 PM | #68 |
Banned
4143
Rep 6,926
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-09-2013, 01:51 PM | #69 | |
Private First Class
3
Rep 159
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-09-2013, 02:34 PM | #70 | |
Second Lieutenant
14
Rep 217
Posts |
Quote:
Furthermore, who cares if he really was putting down 750whp(but it was not)???? That would just make the BMW M3/S65 look even weaker than it already is by way of comparison to the AMG M156 63 motor wouldn't it? We are already sitting here comparing a stock internals/stock trans C63 with a pretty much fully built M3. If we were comparing apples to apples we should have lined up Drew's car with Jim's built motor CLK. You guys would not have like the outcome of that race. I am what you call a neuteral thrid party, I am a BMW guy, even had on an ///M cap all weekend getting crap from the Weistec crew for wearing it, but a built/blown S65 does not stand a chance in hell against a built/blown M156 Wait until JRCART gets his SLS Black Series, he is getting the first one in North America, it will be getting the full Weistec treatment and it will be putting dow 1000whp and the car only weighs 3300 pounds |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-09-2013, 02:58 PM | #71 |
Second Lieutenant
14
Rep 217
Posts |
Here you guys go....this should put it into perspective. Here is what happens when you line JRCARTS fully built CLK BS vs his C BS that ran agains Drew.
Does anyone here in their right mind think there is a roadgoing BMW on the planet that can hang with that CLK? The airplane is epic LOL |
Appreciate
0
|
04-09-2013, 04:52 PM | #72 | |
Brigadier General
501
Rep 4,033
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
16 F82 M4 DCT - ZCP - JB4 - 556WHP / 570WTQ
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.14s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690WHP/463WTQ Shift-S3ctor E92 M3 - 1/2 Mile Trap Speed WR - 174.13 MPH |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-09-2013, 04:54 PM | #73 | |
Brigadier General
501
Rep 4,033
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
16 F82 M4 DCT - ZCP - JB4 - 556WHP / 570WTQ
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.14s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690WHP/463WTQ Shift-S3ctor E92 M3 - 1/2 Mile Trap Speed WR - 174.13 MPH |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-09-2013, 07:06 PM | #76 | |
Captain
56
Rep 605
Posts |
Thanks for the specific info on JRCart's car. Maybe I was getting the two confused. 660whp does seem quite low though as some mentioned. Wouldn't have guessed it.
I'm sure you mean "road going E92 M3". There are some BMWs that will definitely hang with that CLK BS IMO. Running 9.54s and trapping 158... Quote:
__________________
2014 M5 Competition Alpine/Sakhir BMS Tune. Undercover Performance Custom Downpipes & Connector. H&R 10mm Spacers. BMW CF Rear Spoiler. IND Cosmetics. ALP & BEL Radar & Laser. 2011 Space Grey E92 M3 AA Gen 2 Lvl 3 586whp 398wtq SAE (sold) |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-09-2013, 07:16 PM | #77 |
Second Lieutenant
14
Rep 217
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-09-2013, 07:19 PM | #78 | |
Banned
114
Rep 2,682
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-09-2013, 07:20 PM | #79 | ||
Banned
114
Rep 2,682
Posts |
Quote:
60-130 runs in ? |
||
Appreciate
0
|
04-09-2013, 07:24 PM | #80 | |
Second Lieutenant
14
Rep 217
Posts |
Quote:
Here is a link to Weistec's website, argue with them about their claims, I would think if it made more power they would gladly advertise it, not too many tuners out there lowballing their hp claims, but plenty of them inflating them. This is why I am sometimes embarassed to be a BMW owner, some of you guys are stubborn, mis-informed and think your cars are unbeatable...did a lot of you guys own Mustangs in you early 20's lol? http://www.weistec.com/m156sc.html |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-09-2013, 09:49 PM | #81 | ||
Banned
114
Rep 2,682
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
04-09-2013, 10:31 PM | #82 | |
Brigadier General
1040
Rep 3,622
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-10-2013, 08:51 AM | #83 | |
Second Lieutenant
14
Rep 217
Posts |
Quote:
I just refered the owner of the car(Jim) to this thread, he is laughing his ass off. He said the car is sitting at Weistec and if anyone wants to go pick up the car and pay for dyno time and the car makes anything over 675whp he will sign the title over to them and fed ex it to you and the car is yours. The car will have the same 76mm pulley it had on it at the event this weekend. If the car makes 675whp or less please PayPal him $1000 for his troubles.......any takers? As for being proud of what I drive, I am extremely proud of what I drive, I am into road racing and I constantly spank cars with WAYYYY more hp than mine on road courses, what I am not proud of is people with attitudes like yours that think just because one car beats another the car that won is cheating or making false claims. ...so many frigging experts out there Last edited by partlowr; 04-10-2013 at 08:58 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-10-2013, 09:11 AM | #84 |
Second Lieutenant
14
Rep 217
Posts |
JRCART wanted me to post this as well, he actually tried registering an account here about a month ago after the No Fly Zone event and admin has yet to approve his account. If somebody can get his account validated he would be more than happy to have a civil discussion with you guys. He said the funniest thing is that over on the MB boards guys are claiming the hp numbers he is posting are inflated and over here you guys are claiming the numbers are low, he can not win LOL.
He also wanted me to ask if any of you are doing the Wannagofast 1/2 mile event in Chicago in June? |
Appreciate
0
|
04-10-2013, 10:22 AM | #85 | |
Banned
114
Rep 2,682
Posts |
Quote:
Ask any decent tuner they will say the same. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-10-2013, 10:27 AM | #86 | |
Brigadier General
501
Rep 4,033
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
16 F82 M4 DCT - ZCP - JB4 - 556WHP / 570WTQ
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.14s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690WHP/463WTQ Shift-S3ctor E92 M3 - 1/2 Mile Trap Speed WR - 174.13 MPH |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-10-2013, 10:37 AM | #87 |
Second Lieutenant
14
Rep 217
Posts |
I do no think the big 6.2 L Benz motor revs quite as high as your S65's do, that could be part of it. What does Drew's car weigh in at? Jim C BS is a tad over 4100 pound with him in it. I really can not explain it either but his car is making 667whp. Drew met us, I am sure he will tell you we are straight shooters. We were not hustling for a money race we just wanted to run the baddest E92 on the planet to see how the two stacked up. Domestic guys have their Ford vs Chevy grudge matches and I guess us Euro guys have our AMG vs M Power rivalry. Jim is a fair guy, he already posted on another forum that he believes the race would have been closer had it been a 1/4 mile and offered Drew a rematch on a quarter mile. Drew felt his car was not running totally up to par and Jim will gladly run him again. I believe Jim is doing a private rental at Famoso in a few weeks, as soon as I get the exact dates I or Jim will let Drew know if he wants to come out and take another stab at the Benz. jim and I live in chicago so the cars will be getting shipped back here right after the 1/4 mile event so if there is going to be a rematch it will have to be in the next few weeks.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-10-2013, 10:49 AM | #88 | |
Second Lieutenant
14
Rep 217
Posts |
Quote:
On a funnier note, Joseph is going bonkers over there on his site, he made it so Jim can not post and is flaming Jim and I left and right LOL |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|