|
|
07-14-2014, 09:39 AM | #45 |
Major
59
Rep 1,250
Posts |
All about trade offs. Do I prefer the sound of the S65? Sure. Would I turn down a S55 in my car? hell no. You can't compare the power and torque output of the 2 motors, especially with light tuning on the turbo car. The S65 sounds great, and is great if you keep it spun up, but it is pretty torque-less.
^good posts, I agree. Some of the most iconic cars have been turbo, including the F40 and 959 (and yellow bird for that matter). |
Appreciate
0
|
07-14-2014, 12:38 PM | #46 |
Dingleberries
76
Rep 1,246
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-14-2014, 12:50 PM | #47 | |
Law Enforcer
25156
Rep 22,292
Posts
Drives: '22 Chalk Gray Porsche C2S
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ..in your rearview!!!
|
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-14-2014, 12:58 PM | #48 | |
Major General
1889
Rep 5,506
Posts |
Quote:
Living in a urban place means I could go everywhere without a car. Nights out late was not a problem as I could catch the bus and train at night since it runs 24 hours and takes less time to get to places than driving a car across the city. Instant access to hundreds of restaurants, bars/clubs and entertainment venues. And it wasn't just me. Between my friends and I very few of us had cars or could afford to pay for the high costs for operating and parking a car. Besides the occasional trip outside of the city, there was not really a need for a car. I like cars. Great toys and lots of fun. I do track days, autocross and drive a car every day now but I don't really see it as "freedom" as my regular life would go on about the same without one.
__________________
Auto Detailing Enthusiast!
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-14-2014, 01:27 PM | #49 | |
Brigadier General
380
Rep 3,934
Posts |
Quote:
Of course turbo engines can make more power than N/A engines all day. But there is more to a engine than power. This is such a hard concept for many turbo guys to understand. Heres what i will leave you with because we are never going to agree . Better believe Ferrari is switching to turbos only because of emissions/fuel consumption. Its not like there V12 700HP engine needs the help of turbos. They have stated there hate for turbochargers over the years. If you follow Ferrari. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-14-2014, 01:37 PM | #50 | |
Brigadier General
380
Rep 3,934
Posts |
Quote:
You want a truly race car feel. with lots of power, lots of revs, you buy a Ferrari with V8 562 horsepower at 9,000 rpm or a V12 with 700HP and a 8500RPM redline. You think the owner of these cars complain about torque ? Dont you think the guys over at Ferrari maybe know what they are doing ? maybe they know what there customers want ? maybe just maybe a high revving, less torque engine might still be very fun on the track.... did i mention how good a V12 N/A sounds ? did you know even with Ferrari going turbo, they turned DOWN the torque? i laugh every time some one talks about gas and high end exotics. i never cared much about gas, and i drive a M3. How do you think owners of a 300k Ferrari feel about gas? Stop taking about gas. you want a more practical engine that can help your trip to wall mart be more fun. grab a GTR. Last edited by Ezio; 07-14-2014 at 01:43 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-14-2014, 01:39 PM | #51 | |
Captain
164
Rep 658
Posts |
Quote:
The LaFerrari's V12 is pretty awesome, so is the P1's TT V8. But probably the most fun (for me at this time) is a big block torque monster. Still having regrets for not getting a C63 over my E90. Completely different motors but both awesome in their own right. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-14-2014, 01:48 PM | #52 | |
Brigadier General
380
Rep 3,934
Posts |
Quote:
I like the idea how you can buy either type of engine. But as time goes on everything is going turbo thats why i am sad. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|