|
|
03-22-2009, 11:58 AM | #1 |
Lieutenant
50
Rep 470
Posts |
Need input from AA concerning forced induction
Putting any kind of forced induction on a motor that already has a compression ratio of 12:1 makes me nervous.
Another forum member (PencilGeek) has already shown that just putting in 100 octane fuel picked up 36HP/35TQ which really surprised me. That's just not normal and makes me believe that the stock timing is... or can be very aggressive if the knock senors don't get in the way. Using an intercooler helps make power and cuts down on detonation, but I would have to assume that you must have to remove a lot of timing for your new supercharger setup. |
03-22-2009, 10:27 PM | #2 | |
Lieutenant
28
Rep 487
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-22-2009, 11:22 PM | #3 |
I like cars
329
Rep 5,052
Posts |
Back when I had an E46 I looked pretty hard for cases of people who trashed their motors with AA, VF, or ESS blowers. I don't think I ever found a single one.
__________________
My photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/racelap/
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-23-2009, 12:32 AM | #4 |
Major
64
Rep 1,498
Posts |
In the e46 m3 days, people were nervous with the e46's 11.5:1 compression ratio too. I remember the first e46 m3 in the 11's was an AA supercharged m3 that was running nitrous. Everyone thought the motor was going to blow. There are always the skeptics. There is a member of m3forum with an e46 m3 that runs a 200 shot of nitrous. Everyone thought he was going to blow, but he put it on at 12,000 miles, and today the motor has 80,000 miles+ and is still running fine. People underestimated the s54 and were completely proven wrong when the HPF kits came out and they saw how stout the stock internals and block are. at moderate boost levels, the high compression ratio should be ok. Only time can tell once these supercharger kits come out that we can tell how much power these motors can handle, just like when people started putting 200 shots of nitrous on the m5's s85.
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-23-2009, 03:22 PM | #5 | |
Lieutenant Colonel
177
Rep 1,783
Posts |
Quick writeup from our Engineering Director, Karl Hugh:
Quote:
Last edited by Omar@ActiveAutowerke; 03-23-2009 at 04:35 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-23-2009, 04:07 PM | #7 |
I like cars
329
Rep 5,052
Posts |
that's a pretty great post from Karl, I wish we'd get more of those. There were a lot of things mentioned about the S65 that I've never heard of before, very informative.
__________________
My photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/racelap/
|
Appreciate
0
|
03-25-2009, 02:25 PM | #10 | ||
Brigadier General
501
Rep 4,033
Posts |
Quote:
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BMW_S65 "New lightweight spark coils with integrated knock sensors are fitted to each cylinder, bringing the total sensor count to eight compared with two on the V10. This allows more accurate detection of knocking with the added benefit that the eight sensors actually weigh less than the previous two sensor setup."
__________________
16 F82 M4 DCT - ZCP - JB4 - 556WHP / 570WTQ
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ ESS VT3-750 - 60-130MPH 6.14s - 10.81 @ 135.13 MPH 690WHP/463WTQ Shift-S3ctor E92 M3 - 1/2 Mile Trap Speed WR - 174.13 MPH |
||
Appreciate
0
|
03-26-2009, 01:47 PM | #12 | ||
Lieutenant Colonel
177
Rep 1,783
Posts |
Quote:
Reply from Karl: Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|