|
|
07-06-2007, 07:05 PM | #1 |
Captain
55
Rep 817
Posts |
National Post article
|
07-06-2007, 11:12 PM | #4 |
Private
15
Rep 69
Posts |
hahaha well at least its pretty positive, i think that we are going to have to wait untill some "real" tests come out, where these car magazines can do whatever they want to the car (with in reason of course)
i did however like the line: "The previous M3 was a blinder of the first order; the newest model makes it seem almost pedestrian by comparison." i guess we will have to wait and see it this is true, it e46 is a BRILLIANT car so i dont know |
Appreciate
0
|
07-06-2007, 11:19 PM | #5 |
O! So Sour!!
549
Rep 15,615
Posts
Drives: Fast 240z / Slow M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: 'Merica!
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-07-2007, 02:32 AM | #6 |
Second Lieutenant
3
Rep 256
Posts |
+1 especially after that nurburgring laptime debacle.
__________________
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-09-2007, 02:42 PM | #7 |
Lieutenant
23
Rep 453
Posts |
That is not a misprint. It is the often quoted SAE net hp and torque which is different than the DIN hp number that you may have seen floating around in European-sourced info. SAE and DIN use slightly different standards for hp measurement.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-09-2007, 05:06 PM | #8 |
First Lieutenant
7
Rep 319
Posts |
100 ft/lb difference? Please.
|
Appreciate
0
|
07-09-2007, 05:16 PM | #9 |
Lieutenant
33
Rep 563
Posts
Drives: 2007 E92 M3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: London
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|