|
|
01-27-2013, 12:29 PM | #1 |
Private First Class
18
Rep 150
Posts |
Carbon Roof vs Moonroof
There has been lots of discussion and comparisons between the three pedal cars and the two pedal cars (another below) with documented results, but other than the "carbon roofs are better" statements from its proponents, are there any tests out there to support the claim.
I'm not disputing the fact the carbon roof is a "little" lighter with a commensurate lowering of the CG, but is it enough to make a difference in lap times or acceleration? My personal feeling is it is just another form of bling. I have no doubt that a car with multiple panels will be faster, but not sure the difference will justify the cost for a mixed use vehicle, (street and track days). So, is anyone aware of a comparison between the two? |
01-27-2013, 12:33 PM | #2 |
First Lieutenant
36
Rep 344
Posts
Drives: 2017 m4
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: MA
|
I'm glad you posted this question. As I found myself recently considering between the two in regards to functionality rather than weight, but would still like to know the latter. I've decided to go moonroof with a cf vinyl wrap and venture shield
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2013, 12:33 PM | #3 |
Brigadier General
1977
Rep 4,220
Posts |
This test has been done. Unfortunately it was done with a driver of the carbon fiber car who weighed 45 pounds more than the driver of the moonroof car. Also one car was a sedan and one was a coupe. Also one car had DCT and one had a MT. Results were close.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2013, 12:38 PM | #4 |
Private First Class
10
Rep 126
Posts |
Performance difference will be minute. Carbon roof looks great on certain paints, especially Melbourne and alpine, but I love my moon roof. It's nice even in winter to crack it open to prevent the car from getting stuffy. While i still feel a twang of regret when I see cf, it's quickly overcome by the utility and luxury of the moon roof. I've chosen to shed weight in the exhaust and rims to even up the weight score with the cf guys.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2013, 12:55 PM | #5 | |
Major
140
Rep 1,242
Posts
Drives: 2012 E92 M3
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Florida's Emerald Coast
|
Quote:
2. There is no charge for a moon roof in place of the default carbon fiber roof.
__________________
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2013, 01:11 PM | #6 |
Private First Class
18
Rep 150
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2013, 01:14 PM | #8 | |
Captain
111
Rep 746
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2013, 01:53 PM | #9 |
Lieutenant
60
Rep 552
Posts
Drives: 2015 C63 507
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: New England
|
Unless you plan on tracking the car I doubt you would notice the increase in weight and decrease in structural rigidity. Many people prefer the look of the carbon fiber roof, but to each is own. IMHO I think the carbon roof adds a nice contrast to the overall appearance of the car. The only difference I could foresee would be in the resale market. I would guess that more buyers would seek the carbon roof over the moonroof. But if you like the moonroof then go for it. It's what you like, not us.
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2013, 03:48 PM | #10 |
HayZeus
17
Rep 302
Posts |
hahaha ! This again...... until i see proof , i will consider anyone who thinks it does make a difference to be crazy....
REAL proof.... ! Track test with one driver , identically equipped cars with same tires. 0.00000000000002 seconds per lap is my guess.
__________________
BLOME !!!
MW E92 , Turner test pipes , Vorsteiner Titanium catback, TMS spacers, ESS remap , KW sleeves. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2013, 03:53 PM | #12 |
-
11817
Rep 23,187
Posts |
if i had a choice in my e90 i would take the carbon roof as the moonroof decreases headroom once i have a helmet on making my seating postion not as perfect as i would like.
__________________
02 Tiag e46 M3|6MT|GC plates|MCS c.o.|GC bars|GC race control arms|GC bushings|BW eng. & tran. mounts|subframe kit|BW race shifter|BW Jaffster|Euro header|BW exhaust|K&N c.a.i.|Epic race tune|Rouge pulleys|Seibon CF hood|CSL bumper|apr gt 250 & splitter|ST-40|XR-2|SS lines|half cage|Recaro profi|Profi 2 harness|BMWpedals|BW studs| |
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2013, 03:58 PM | #13 | |
Banned
42
Rep 1,463
Posts |
Quote:
The argument can be made that most mods on this car are bling..this is not one of them..its functional, its factory and its free..what else need I say |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2013, 04:34 PM | #14 |
Colonel
831
Rep 2,352
Posts
Drives: 16' BMW i8
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: The REAL Jersey Shore
iTrader: (1)
Garage List 2001 BMW M3 E46 CON ... [9.50]
2016 BMW i8 [10.00] 2003 JEEP GRAND CHE ... [0.00] 2000 540i SPORT E39 [10.00] 2007 TOYOTA TACOMA ... [0.00] |
Count me in for the sunroof. I am hoping the new M4 will also have a sunroof option
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2013, 04:56 PM | #16 |
...
935
Rep 4,326
Posts
Drives: M340
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
|
For Me...... I can care less about the "performance" aspect.
-I use the sun roof all the time in my other cars (mainly tilt function) -Will I buy a M3 with a sunroof? Absolutely Not It think CF roof looks like crap on Space Gray and Black cars..... It definitely looks like crap with most bamboo interiors. BUT AW / CF is a timeless combo At the end of the day, one should choose CF for looks and not performance. I was first going to order a Space Gray, 6MT with sunroof .......A friend made a comment - Besides the engine, you pretty much took out everything that makes M3 a M3.....meaning DCT & CF roof. His comment sure made me think for a while.
__________________
2020 G20 M340 xDrive - Portimao Blue - ZDA|ZPP|ZPX|1CR|1PE|6NW|6WD
2016 F10 535i xDrive - AW - Retired 2011 E92 M3 - AW……………....ED April 29th, 2010 - Retired 2007 E92 335i -Space Gray.....ED Oct 19th, 2006 - Retired |
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2013, 05:01 PM | #17 | |
-
11817
Rep 23,187
Posts |
Quote:
__________________
02 Tiag e46 M3|6MT|GC plates|MCS c.o.|GC bars|GC race control arms|GC bushings|BW eng. & tran. mounts|subframe kit|BW race shifter|BW Jaffster|Euro header|BW exhaust|K&N c.a.i.|Epic race tune|Rouge pulleys|Seibon CF hood|CSL bumper|apr gt 250 & splitter|ST-40|XR-2|SS lines|half cage|Recaro profi|Profi 2 harness|BMWpedals|BW studs| |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2013, 05:10 PM | #18 |
Second Lieutenant
12
Rep 253
Posts |
No matter what your arguments are in terms of how noticeable a difference it is:
The carbon fiber roof is a significant and defining cost element of the E92 M3. The roof would easily cost you $5000 to replicate. Paying the same price for a car yet electing to have a moon-roof instead is just (in my opinion, of course) a completely and profoundly illogical decision. If BMW offered a 300hp version of the engine, would you choose it for the same price? "I can barely feel the difference around town!"
__________________
Last edited by Goat Rodeo; 01-27-2013 at 05:23 PM.. |
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2013, 05:10 PM | #19 | |
Colonel
499
Rep 2,400
Posts |
Don't think it makes much of a difference, if any based on following: 1) Sedan vs Coupe performance, don't see it in published track times on same tracks and same trannies; 2) in racing, Turner Motorsports (and aGerman tuner, can't remember which one exactly) actually believe that sedan is better aerodynamically/dynamically vs the coupe despite lack of CF..ie CF roof and weight isn't enough to make a difference, 3) At the M driving school, when instructors were asked about feature differences showing up in lap times of ZCP/Non ZCP, Sedan vs Coupe, CF roof vs no CF roof, they said that various features weren't predictors of lap times, ie fastest laps always went to the best drivers, no matter what configuration and given a certain driver, feature configuration didn't determine the speed of any given lap. So unless we're talking pro-racing differences where split seconds really matter, just be happy w/ your choices & enjoy them to their fullest extent!
Quote:
Last edited by FogCityM3; 01-27-2013 at 05:21 PM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2013, 05:15 PM | #20 |
...
935
Rep 4,326
Posts
Drives: M340
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Not going to get into colors and tastes argument and clearly what makes an M3 a M3 discussion was for only this generation.
__________________
2020 G20 M340 xDrive - Portimao Blue - ZDA|ZPP|ZPX|1CR|1PE|6NW|6WD
2016 F10 535i xDrive - AW - Retired 2011 E92 M3 - AW……………....ED April 29th, 2010 - Retired 2007 E92 335i -Space Gray.....ED Oct 19th, 2006 - Retired |
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2013, 05:16 PM | #21 |
Captain
172
Rep 676
Posts |
Yes so get what you want and practice your driving. Oh and maybe a suspension mod or three! My sedan with Dinan stage 3 and front control arm monoballs is a heck of a lot better than a car with a CF roof handling wise!
|
Appreciate
0
|
01-27-2013, 05:18 PM | #22 |
Captain
172
Rep 676
Posts |
BTW I got these mods in three phases and each was profound in its benefit but I keep 100 lbs of salt in the trunk to add to traction in case it snows and I can't feel that when it goes in or when it goes out in the spring- not at all.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|