BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > BIMMERPOST Universal Forums > Off-Topic Discussions Board > Photography/Videography
 
EXXEL Distributions
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      07-23-2013, 10:12 AM   #4467
dcstep
Major General
United_States
1288
Rep
7,389
Posts

Drives: '09 Cpe Silverstone FR 6MT
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Colorado

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2009 M3  [8.40]
Quote:
Originally Posted by M_Six View Post
Chewy, if that post above was supposed to talk Dave out of buying a 1D-X, it failed. Hell, I'm ready to get one now.

I have a question with regards to super-teles. I was daydreaming the other day and looking at a 400mm f2.8 IS II. Using a 2x TC would give you 800mm @ f5.6 with IS, which seems very attractive. What are your reasons for going with the 500 f4 IS over the 400 f2.8? Wouldn't the speed of f5.6 vs f8 be useful? Or does the added reach outweigh that?
800mm is nice, but 1,000mm is better and 1,200mm is something else. If you could stack the TC-IIIs, then f/2.8 would allow combining to get out to 1,040mm, but you can't stack the TC-IIIs unless you put an extension tube in middle and then you can't infinity focus.

Stacking Kenko TCs could be an option.

I haven't looked at the MTF charts for the 400mm f/2.8 IS II. I suspect that it's greatly improved over the not so great S-I. The 500mm S-II is almost flat. My S-I is so good, it's hard to imagine it getting better.

If you don't have a camera that'll focus at f/8, then I recommend switching bodies before buying any of these lenses. Yeah, with the 400/2.8 you can AF on any of the prosumer Canons at f/5.6, but none of those AF systems is anywhere near as accurate, consistent and flexible as the 1D series and the 5D3. Believe me, even the 7D is a distant second best when it comes to accuracy and consistency. (I own one). For super telephoto shooting you need both a great lens and a body with strong AF.

I hang out some at bird photographers.net and the most common lenses I see used are the 300/2.8, 400/5.6, 500/4.0, 600/4.0 and 800/5.6. I can't recall seeing the 400/2.8 mentioned. If you search for it on Flickr you get a wide range of images, but mostly sport, indoor and outdoor.

I used to shoot my 500mm at 700mm using my 1.4x TC, but as soon as my camera would AF at f/8, I put on an EF 2.0x TC-III to shoot at 1,000mm and hardly take it off. I carry two cameras, so I've got a 70-200mm with a 1.4x TC attached on the 7D body. Whether you'll carry two bodies is a big factor. Almost all sport photographers do and many of us wildlife guys do.

Dave
__________________
Appreciate 0
      07-23-2013, 10:31 AM   #4468
M_Six
Free Thinker
M_Six's Avatar
United_States
16332
Rep
7,446
Posts

Drives: 2016 MB GLC300 4matic
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Foothills of Mt Level

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dcstep View Post
800mm is nice, but 1,000mm is better and 1,200mm is something else. If you could stack the TC-IIIs, then f/2.8 would allow combining to get out to 1,040mm, but you can't stack the TC-IIIs unless you put an extension tube in middle and then you can't infinity focus.

Stacking Kenko TCs could be an option.

I haven't looked at the MTF charts for the 400mm f/2.8 IS II. I suspect that it's greatly improved over the not so great S-I. The 500mm S-II is almost flat. My S-I is so good, it's hard to imagine it getting better.

If you don't have a camera that'll focus at f/8, then I recommend switching bodies before buying any of these lenses. Yeah, with the 400/2.8 you can AF on any of the prosumer Canons at f/5.6, but none of those AF systems is anywhere near as accurate, consistent and flexible as the 1D series and the 5D3. Believe me, even the 7D is a distant second best when it comes to accuracy and consistency. (I own one). For super telephoto shooting you need both a great lens and a body with strong AF.

I hang out some at bird photographers.net and the most common lenses I see used are the 300/2.8, 400/5.6, 500/4.0, 600/4.0 and 800/5.6. I can't recall seeing the 400/2.8 mentioned. If you search for it on Flickr you get a wide range of images, but mostly sport, indoor and outdoor.

I used to shoot my 500mm at 700mm using my 1.4x TC, but as soon as my camera would AF at f/8, I put on an EF 2.0x TC-III to shoot at 1,000mm and hardly take it off. I carry two cameras, so I've got a 70-200mm with a 1.4x TC attached on the 7D body. Whether you'll carry two bodies is a big factor. Almost all sport photographers do and many of us wildlife guys do.

Dave
I have a dual RS sling strap that I'll use to carry two bodies when I need them. Probably the 6D with the 400 5.6 and 1.4x TC and the 7D with the 70-200 2.8 and the 2x TC. That will be some serious weight, though. I won't be walking too far with all that. For the upcoming local airshow, I plan on working from the tailgate of my X5 with the 6D set up on a tripod and the 7D on a sling.

For a week in late Aug and early Sep a B-25 bomber is visiting the local airfield to give rides. I don't care so much about getting a ride, but I want lots of shots of it taking off and landing.
__________________
Mark
markj.pics

"There is no shame in dropping fruit in your glass."
-UncleWede
Appreciate 0
      07-23-2013, 10:54 AM   #4469
dcstep
Major General
United_States
1288
Rep
7,389
Posts

Drives: '09 Cpe Silverstone FR 6MT
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Colorado

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2009 M3  [8.40]
Quote:
Originally Posted by M_Six View Post
I have a dual RS sling strap that I'll use to carry two bodies when I need them. Probably the 6D with the 400 5.6 and 1.4x TC and the 7D with the 70-200 2.8 and the 2x TC. That will be some serious weight, though. I won't be walking too far with all that. For the upcoming local airshow, I plan on working from the tailgate of my X5 with the 6D set up on a tripod and the 7D on a sling.

For a week in late Aug and early Sep a B-25 bomber is visiting the local airfield to give rides. I don't care so much about getting a ride, but I want lots of shots of it taking off and landing.
I carry my 500/f4 by the tripod foot and have the 7D on a CPS strap around my neck with the 70-200/f4. That keeps the weight on my neck reasonable. It's still a load that I'll carry for hundreds of yards per day and up to a couple of hours. For a two-mile hike in, I really need to get a backpack for the 500/f4. I don't do that often, but I need something like that.

I've noticed that most of the pro sports photogs have their long lens on a monopod and the short cameras slung around their shoulders or necks.

I thank my junior high and high school coaches for forcing me to lift weights. I've got a linebacker build and started water skiing at age-6 and played all sports, so it may be easier for me to lug things than the average photog. (Now if I could just lose 30-pounds off my stomach, it'd be real easy going). Unfortunately the arthritus in my ankles, feet and neck, caused by those sports, somewhat offset the benefits. Believe me, those ankle sprains at 12 to 18 hurt even more at 65. (Not as acute, but longer lasting... or constant).

Dave
__________________
Appreciate 0
      07-23-2013, 11:04 AM   #4470
dcstep
Major General
United_States
1288
Rep
7,389
Posts

Drives: '09 Cpe Silverstone FR 6MT
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Colorado

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2009 M3  [8.40]
Speaking of lens MTF charts and full frame file quality, here's an 80% crop taken with my 500/f4 S-I and the 2.0x TC-III, on the 5D3. The S-II is supposed to be even better, but I'm already blown away with my S-I:


Goldfinch shows me his profile. by dcstep, on Flickr

I see people pooh-poohing using TCs all the time, claiming the IQ penalty is too large. I claim BULL SHIT. Those people couldn't have ever tried it. I even had one guy claim that his standards must be higher than mine, because anyone could see the distortion.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      07-23-2013, 11:42 AM   #4471
Itsed65
Brigadier General
Itsed65's Avatar
2606
Rep
3,535
Posts

Drives: 2014 X1 28i
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Midcoast Maine

iTrader: (0)

Well I will be anxious to read about your experience. I think my next big camera purchase is going to be either the 500 or 600 for use with my 1D4 (not counting the NEX6 I just ordered). I just need to save up some more. I just bought a custom made chair adapter for a Segway that should allow me to finally get off the pavement a bit more, and that took a bite out of my photography fund.
Appreciate 0
      07-23-2013, 12:04 PM   #4472
dcstep
Major General
United_States
1288
Rep
7,389
Posts

Drives: '09 Cpe Silverstone FR 6MT
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Colorado

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2009 M3  [8.40]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Itsed65 View Post
Well I will be anxious to read about your experience. I think my next big camera purchase is going to be either the 500 or 600 for use with my 1D4 (not counting the NEX6 I just ordered). I just need to save up some more. I just bought a custom made chair adapter for a Segway that should allow me to finally get off the pavement a bit more, and that took a bite out of my photography fund.
Mobility comes first. You've got to get there to get the shot. What's the old saying, "...f/8 and be there?"

I have a friend with the 5D3, 1D4 and the 1D-X. He ranks their AF with a 600/f4 II in that same order. He says that they're relatively close, but both the 1Ds handle the super-teles better with TCs.

The weight savings and dollar savings on the 500mm has me leaning that way, but, I know that I can handle the weight of the 600mm because it's about the same as my current 500mm. We'll have to see.

We're in the midst of signing a big prospect that we've been working for six-years. If signed, it'll greatly improve my retirement saving and expand my photography fund significantly. Knock wood and fingers crossed.

Dave
__________________
Appreciate 0
      07-23-2013, 12:47 PM   #4473
M_Six
Free Thinker
M_Six's Avatar
United_States
16332
Rep
7,446
Posts

Drives: 2016 MB GLC300 4matic
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Foothills of Mt Level

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dcstep View Post
I carry my 500/f4 by the tripod foot and have the 7D on a CPS strap around my neck with the 70-200/f4. That keeps the weight on my neck reasonable. It's still a load that I'll carry for hundreds of yards per day and up to a couple of hours. For a two-mile hike in, I really need to get a backpack for the 500/f4. I don't do that often, but I need something like that.

I've noticed that most of the pro sports photogs have their long lens on a monopod and the short cameras slung around their shoulders or necks.

I thank my junior high and high school coaches for forcing me to lift weights. I've got a linebacker build and started water skiing at age-6 and played all sports, so it may be easier for me to lug things than the average photog. (Now if I could just lose 30-pounds off my stomach, it'd be real easy going). Unfortunately the arthritus in my ankles, feet and neck, caused by those sports, somewhat offset the benefits. Believe me, those ankle sprains at 12 to 18 hurt even more at 65. (Not as acute, but longer lasting... or constant).

Dave
The problem I have with using a monopod for one rig is that you have to be really careful what you do with it when you grab the other rig hanging around your neck. You can sort of lean it against your body while using the other rig, but you risk the whole thing falling over. At least with a tripod, you can just let it sit there while you use the other rig. You can even walk a few steps away, if need be.

And I'm right there with you on the weight thing. 30lbs off my gut would be hugely beneficial. I try to do a lot of walking, but some knee injuries from my Army days and current issues with the nerves and bones in my feet have limited me as I get older. Just a couple of years ago I could speed walk 2-3 miles easily. Now a walk around campus leaves me limping. Getting old sucks. I did walk 4 miles in Boston one day while I was there. I was fine while walking, but I was aching badly later.
__________________
Mark
markj.pics

"There is no shame in dropping fruit in your glass."
-UncleWede
Appreciate 0
      07-23-2013, 12:49 PM   #4474
M_Six
Free Thinker
M_Six's Avatar
United_States
16332
Rep
7,446
Posts

Drives: 2016 MB GLC300 4matic
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Foothills of Mt Level

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dcstep View Post
Speaking of lens MTF charts and full frame file quality, here's an 80% crop taken with my 500/f4 S-I and the 2.0x TC-III, on the 5D3. The S-II is supposed to be even better, but I'm already blown away with my S-I:


Goldfinch shows me his profile. by dcstep, on Flickr

I see people pooh-poohing using TCs all the time, claiming the IQ penalty is too large. I claim BULL SHIT. Those people couldn't have ever tried it. I even had one guy claim that his standards must be higher than mine, because anyone could see the distortion.
Very nice shot. And I agree, the IQ using the TCs (even the Kenko versions) is entirely acceptable. I don't know why they have such a bad rep with some folks.
__________________
Mark
markj.pics

"There is no shame in dropping fruit in your glass."
-UncleWede
Appreciate 0
      07-23-2013, 12:57 PM   #4475
Chewy734
Major General
United_States
464
Rep
6,798
Posts

Drives: 2006 BMW 330i ZPP, ZSP
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: LA, CA

iTrader: (15)

Is it bad that I have a box from B&H from nearly two weeks ago that I haven't even opened? Damn work....
__________________
Appreciate 0
      07-23-2013, 02:24 PM   #4476
dcstep
Major General
United_States
1288
Rep
7,389
Posts

Drives: '09 Cpe Silverstone FR 6MT
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Colorado

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2009 M3  [8.40]
Quote:
Originally Posted by M_Six View Post
The problem I have with using a monopod for one rig is that you have to be really careful what you do with it when you grab the other rig hanging around your neck. You can sort of lean it against your body while using the other rig, but you risk the whole thing falling over. At least with a tripod, you can just let it sit there while you use the other rig. You can even walk a few steps away, if need be.

And I'm right there with you on the weight thing. 30lbs off my gut would be hugely beneficial. I try to do a lot of walking, but some knee injuries from my Army days and current issues with the nerves and bones in my feet have limited me as I get older. Just a couple of years ago I could speed walk 2-3 miles easily. Now a walk around campus leaves me limping. Getting old sucks. I did walk 4 miles in Boston one day while I was there. I was fine while walking, but I was aching badly later.
Sorry 'bout the aches and pains. I'm with you. It's a bitch, but it's my own fault that I need to shed 30-lbs.

With a monopod or hand carrying, like I do, you've got to be wiling to put the rig on the ground. I do it all the time. I'm got lenscoat on the lenses and don't really care if the bodies show some wear. Tripods are great, but I miss too many shots with them. If I was a sideline shooter for football, then I'd use the monopod. Hand held, in the ready position is great isometric exercise, but it get hard after a few minute. When I'm expecting that, I dust off the tripod or monopod. The goldfinch shot was on my Induro tripod.

Dave
__________________
Appreciate 0
      07-23-2013, 05:03 PM   #4477
M_Six
Free Thinker
M_Six's Avatar
United_States
16332
Rep
7,446
Posts

Drives: 2016 MB GLC300 4matic
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Foothills of Mt Level

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dcstep View Post
...but it's my own fault that I need to shed 30-lbs.
Same here.
__________________
Mark
markj.pics

"There is no shame in dropping fruit in your glass."
-UncleWede
Appreciate 0
      07-24-2013, 10:26 AM   #4478
dcstep
Major General
United_States
1288
Rep
7,389
Posts

Drives: '09 Cpe Silverstone FR 6MT
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Colorado

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2009 M3  [8.40]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chewy734 View Post
Is it bad that I have a box from B&H from nearly two weeks ago that I haven't even opened? Damn work....
That's a sin.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      07-24-2013, 10:29 AM   #4479
Chewy734
Major General
United_States
464
Rep
6,798
Posts

Drives: 2006 BMW 330i ZPP, ZSP
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: LA, CA

iTrader: (15)

Quote:
Originally Posted by dcstep View Post
That's a sin.
I know.

In my defense, it's for my dad though... the EOS-M w/ 22mm lens. But, my job is to test it out and see if he'll like it.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      07-24-2013, 10:50 AM   #4480
BrokenVert
Resident Kerbalnaut
BrokenVert's Avatar
United_States
476
Rep
10,703
Posts

Drives: Topless Brute/Hybrid Boogaloo
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Fahrvergnügen/NY

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chewy734 View Post
I know.

In my defense, it's for my dad though... the EOS-M w/ 22mm lens. But, my job is to test it out and see if he'll like it.
What exactly is new about the M lenses? I havent much about it apart from the fact that there are only 3 or 4 on the market right now.
__________________

Appreciate 0
      07-24-2013, 11:56 AM   #4481
M_Six
Free Thinker
M_Six's Avatar
United_States
16332
Rep
7,446
Posts

Drives: 2016 MB GLC300 4matic
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Foothills of Mt Level

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrokenVert View Post
What exactly is new about the M lenses? I havent much about it apart from the fact that there are only 3 or 4 on the market right now.
Actually only 2 in the US. The 22mm is insanely sharp. 100% crops are no problem with it. I haven't used the 18-55mm lens much, but it seems quite sharp as well and is very small. It has IS, which is a plus. Supposedly Canon is not planning to bring the new 11-22mm IS lens to the US.
__________________
Mark
markj.pics

"There is no shame in dropping fruit in your glass."
-UncleWede
Appreciate 0
      07-24-2013, 12:39 PM   #4482
BrokenVert
Resident Kerbalnaut
BrokenVert's Avatar
United_States
476
Rep
10,703
Posts

Drives: Topless Brute/Hybrid Boogaloo
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Fahrvergnügen/NY

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by M_Six View Post
Actually only 2 in the US. The 22mm is insanely sharp. 100% crops are no problem with it. I haven't used the 18-55mm lens much, but it seems quite sharp as well and is very small. It has IS, which is a plus. Supposedly Canon is not planning to bring the new 11-22mm IS lens to the US.
Great. We need to greymarket more crap from HK.


Do they fit EF mounts like my D7? Or is this a whole new format?
__________________

Appreciate 0
      07-24-2013, 12:42 PM   #4483
Chewy734
Major General
United_States
464
Rep
6,798
Posts

Drives: 2006 BMW 330i ZPP, ZSP
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: LA, CA

iTrader: (15)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrokenVert View Post
Great. We need to greymarket more crap from HK.


Do they fit EF mounts like my D7? Or is this a whole new format?
It's a whole new format, but there is an EF lens adaptor you can purchase separately, that will allow you to attach any EF lens to it. Can you imagine hooking up the tiny M body to Dave's 500mm behemoth?
__________________
Appreciate 0
      07-24-2013, 12:52 PM   #4484
BrokenVert
Resident Kerbalnaut
BrokenVert's Avatar
United_States
476
Rep
10,703
Posts

Drives: Topless Brute/Hybrid Boogaloo
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Fahrvergnügen/NY

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chewy734 View Post
It's a whole new format, but there is an EF lens adaptor you can purchase separately, that will allow you to attach any EF lens to it. Can you imagine hooking up the tiny M body to Dave's 500mm behemoth?
Speaking of adapters:


My father is retiring his Canon A1 body that hes had for 30 or 40 years. He has somewhere near 25 FD or FL lenses (I cant remember which). Including a monster 800mm I want to use as a poor mans telescope.

Ive been looking for a decent adapter for a while now for my 5D or 7D (so an FD - EF adapter) and all I keep hearing is soft focus issues and the prism making contact with things.

So any leads or help would be great.
__________________

Appreciate 0
      07-24-2013, 01:07 PM   #4485
BrokenVert
Resident Kerbalnaut
BrokenVert's Avatar
United_States
476
Rep
10,703
Posts

Drives: Topless Brute/Hybrid Boogaloo
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Fahrvergnügen/NY

iTrader: (0)

Also heres a shot for you guys from GRC in Bristol

__________________

Appreciate 0
      07-24-2013, 02:08 PM   #4486
dcstep
Major General
United_States
1288
Rep
7,389
Posts

Drives: '09 Cpe Silverstone FR 6MT
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Colorado

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2009 M3  [8.40]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chewy734 View Post
It's a whole new format, but there is an EF lens adaptor you can purchase separately, that will allow you to attach any EF lens to it. Can you imagine hooking up the tiny M body to Dave's 500mm behemoth?


We're not there yet, but it's coming. When some AF issues are solved, I see mirrorless as the wave of the future for all shooting. I can imagine attaching a little unit, half the size of a GoPro to the back of a big lens and firing off 30-fps with files transmitted wirelessly to a storage unit on my belt or strapped to my wrist. I wouldn't be surprised if we don't see that within five-years.

Dave
__________________
Appreciate 0
      07-24-2013, 04:05 PM   #4487
dcstep
Major General
United_States
1288
Rep
7,389
Posts

Drives: '09 Cpe Silverstone FR 6MT
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Colorado

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2009 M3  [8.40]
Speaking of the moon, oh wait that's another thread (it fits better here) Induro featured me on their Induro'Blog at:

http://blog.indurogear.com/how-to-ph...ing-your-mind/
__________________
Appreciate 0
      07-24-2013, 05:25 PM   #4488
Chewy734
Major General
United_States
464
Rep
6,798
Posts

Drives: 2006 BMW 330i ZPP, ZSP
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: LA, CA

iTrader: (15)

congrats, Dave! That's a great article... excellent photos too!
__________________
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:45 AM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST