BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Today's Posts


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > E90/E92 M3 Technical Topics > Engine, Transmission, Exhaust, Drivetrain, ECU Software Modifications
 
BPM
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      09-24-2013, 08:36 AM   #23
Longboarder
Major General
Longboarder's Avatar
3486
Rep
6,788
Posts

Drives: 2016 BMW i8
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Monarch Beach

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
Thanks for all the hard work. You certainly aren't a "regular guy" after all. I need to re- read your posts a couple more times to get it to sink in.
__________________
Current BMWs: 2022 X5 40i, 2016 X5 50i
2015 Porsche 991 Turbo S
1979 Porsche 911 Turbo (930)
a couple others
IG: longboarder949; YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCT1...eoFBszPIK0gf9w
Appreciate 0
      09-24-2013, 08:39 AM   #24
thekurgan
Bad Lieutenant
thekurgan's Avatar
United_States
237
Rep
3,517
Posts

Drives: E39M5
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chattanooga

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2008 BMW M3  [0.00]
Interesting the WPC bearings are only using the latest BMW rod bearings as a start. I wonder what that Babbitt material is made from.

Again, nice work.
__________________
02 E39M5 | TiAg/Schwartz | Tubi Rumore | Ultimate Ti Pedals | E60 SSK | Coby Alcantara | StrongStrut STB
Appreciate 0
      09-24-2013, 08:44 AM   #25
Billj747
Captain
Billj747's Avatar
United_States
165
Rep
658
Posts

Drives: Everything
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SoFlo

iTrader: (0)

Thank you for your hard work and proper objective scientific testing. You're a huge benefit to the community.

While Im not claiming that it directly addresses the main S65s issues, I have had a lot of success with WPC treated bearings, pistons, rings, gears, etc... in various racing applications.


On another note:

What is FCT+VAC and CARR+VAC?

how did you measure 0.00290 clearance when you inferred from the thicker bearing a 0.0009-0.0016 clearances?

Last edited by Billj747; 09-24-2013 at 08:55 AM..
Appreciate 0
      09-24-2013, 09:32 AM   #26
Trip3's
Lieutenant
Trip3's's Avatar
23
Rep
453
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Long island

iTrader: (0)

Thanks Regularguy for all your research. I have to do an oil change soon and was searching threads to make sure it was M1 0W40 that I wanted and I realized that we have the Holy Trinity amongst us: Regularguy, Kawasaki00, and Bmrlvr. Who contribute and educate the community with REAL DATA and not opinions. It is much appreciated!
__________________
Appreciate 0
      09-24-2013, 09:32 AM   #27
lsmkr01
Lieutenant Colonel
lsmkr01's Avatar
United_States
44
Rep
1,628
Posts

Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: SC

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billj747 View Post

On another note:

What is FCT+VAC and CARR+VAC?
Factory Rod + VAC (coated) bearing and Carrillo Rod + VAC (coated) bearing.

Glad to have you on the forum Billy.
Appreciate 0
      09-24-2013, 09:40 AM   #28
kawasaki00
Lieutenant Colonel
kawasaki00's Avatar
United_States
234
Rep
1,673
Posts

Drives: SG-E92 ESS-650 BPM Tune
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Charlotte NC

iTrader: (11)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trip3's View Post
Thanks Regularguy for all your research. I have to do an oil change soon and was searching threads to make sure it was M1 0W40 that I wanted and I realized that we have the Holy Trinity amongst us: Regularguy, Kawasaki00, and Bmrlvr. Who contribute and educate the community with REAL DATA and not opinions. It is much appreciated!
Thanks dude, nice to have a few guys that really want to make a difference instead of just posting nonsence
regularguy has helped a bunch with having these parts in front of him to see the differences with all the processes
__________________
Electronics Junkie, Engine Builder.
Appreciate 0
      09-24-2013, 10:17 AM   #29
nineonenine
Random person
United_States
60
Rep
353
Posts

Drives: F80 M3
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Raleigh

iTrader: (0)

So does this sh*t mean I should dump my Jan 2009 build M3 that is out of warranty? Has 30k miles on it. wtf?
Appreciate 0
      09-24-2013, 10:36 AM   #30
Wendall
***Major MammelToe
Wendall's Avatar
United_States
166
Rep
1,138
Posts

Drives: E92 M3 SG coupe
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Orange County, CA

iTrader: (3)

great work regular guy! I really appreciate it. Will Autotalent be selling these WPC rod bearing kits in the future?
__________________
E92 M3 SG DCT - AA Filter, Verstraβe Paddles, ECS SS, MH race stud, Stoptech BBK, MR Exhaust,RE Pulley, BPM Tune,Euro bumper and GTS lip, Euro MDM & DCT, KW CS, Recaro PP, TMS Soild Diff Mounts, MRF solid subframe mounts, GTS aero, RPM track built motor.

Appreciate 0
      09-24-2013, 10:39 AM   #31
Trip3's
Lieutenant
Trip3's's Avatar
23
Rep
453
Posts

Drives: M3
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Long island

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by nineonenine View Post
So does this sh*t mean I should dump my Jan 2009 build M3 that is out of warranty? Has 30k miles on it. wtf?
I would dump it immediately, I will take it off your hands for $25k. This offer expires in 24 hours. On a serious note, I would read through some of the threads on this topic and decide for yourself OR wait for Regular guy to add more info to this thread before you make a decision. Opinions vary, but most people aren't thinking about checking for a problem before 50k from what I have read.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      09-24-2013, 10:59 AM   #32
kawasaki00
Lieutenant Colonel
kawasaki00's Avatar
United_States
234
Rep
1,673
Posts

Drives: SG-E92 ESS-650 BPM Tune
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Charlotte NC

iTrader: (11)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trip3's View Post
I would dump it immediately, I will take it off your hands for $25k. This offer expires in 24 hours. On a serious note, I would read through some of the threads on this topic and decide for yourself OR wait for Regular guy to add more info to this thread before you make a decision. Opinions vary, but most people aren't thinking about checking for a problem before 50k from what I have read.
Most are waiting till 60-75k miles around here. Usually if it makes it past 25 then it is good for a while.
__________________
Electronics Junkie, Engine Builder.
Appreciate 0
      09-24-2013, 11:03 AM   #33
gatorfast
Major General
gatorfast's Avatar
United_States
5073
Rep
6,882
Posts

Drives: 718 Cayman
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SoFla

iTrader: (4)

Granted there is some evidence of bearing wear from engines that have been examined recently. But how many actual documented failures are there? How much wear can be sustained until the engine fails?
Appreciate 0
      09-24-2013, 11:12 AM   #34
nineonenine
Random person
United_States
60
Rep
353
Posts

Drives: F80 M3
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Raleigh

iTrader: (0)

Damn I was hoping to tell the wife I needed to get a GTR before my engine explodes and causes us to go bankrupt. (the bankruptcy thing is a joke, no need to tell me I cant afford a GTR :-P )
Appreciate 0
      09-24-2013, 11:48 AM   #35
JS11
Private First Class
19
Rep
192
Posts

Drives: '08 E92 M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Cambridge, MA

iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by biggynuts01 View Post
great work regular guy! I really appreciate it. Will Autotalent be selling these WPC rod bearing kits in the future?
you can get your stuff wpc treated yourself. they're close to you in torrance and i heard the turnaround is pretty quick.
Appreciate 0
      09-24-2013, 11:55 AM   #36
regular guy
Lieutenant Colonel
429
Rep
1,947
Posts

Drives: Sprint car
Join Date: May 2013
Location: California

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by thekurgan View Post
Interesting the WPC bearings are only using the latest BMW rod bearings as a start.
WPC will treat whatever you send them. If you send them old bearings, they will treat old bearings. Auto Talent sent them new bearings, hence the treatment on new bearings.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billj747 View Post
On another note:

What is FCT+VAC and CARR+VAC?

how did you measure 0.00290 clearance when you inferred from the thicker bearing a 0.0009-0.0016 clearances?
As another member mentioned, FCT+VAC == Factory ROD + VAC bearing, and CARR + VAC == Carrillo ROD + VAC bearing.

I'm sorry I muddled the explanation of the 0.00290 clearance. That was measured, not calculated from a single journal I measured inside the engine of the EAS car. Then we pulled one rod out of my collection, installed a bearing, torqued it and measured. There's two things we did wrong here: 1) We didn't remove the Calico coating from the parting lines which will affect the measurements; 2) I don't know which rod was used -- as I just grabbed one from the box. I didn't yet know that the rod bores differed so much in size. Had I known this at the time, I would have grabbed Rod #4. I thought I had a duty to mention this test because I didn't want to cover it up, but I'm sorry it was inconclusive as we didn't really do it right or scientifically.

I have a friend sending me a set of VAC bearings soon. I will put them in the same connecting rods and measure it before posting the results.

Quote:
Originally Posted by biggynuts01 View Post
great work regular guy! I really appreciate it. Will Autotalent be selling these WPC rod bearing kits in the future?
I believe so, but best to call them to check. I have a hunch a few vendors will now be looking at the WPC process as well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by gatorfast View Post
Granted there is some evidence of bearing wear from engines that have been examined recently. But how many actual documented failures are there? How much wear can be sustained until the engine fails?
Wait until I get the bearing photo database in place. You will get a chance to see all the ones I could find posted, along with a few you haven't. Some engine failures aren't reported on the forums, but do get mentioned in private emails amongst friends. A few months ago, there was a failure of a mostly stock M3. The rod snapped in half, and the big end of the rod was blue with heat damage. Those are clear signs of excessive heat due to lack of lubrication. There's others as well, but no permission yet to post the photos or details.
Appreciate 1
DrFerry6803.50
      09-24-2013, 12:09 PM   #37
signes
Brigadier General
signes's Avatar
United_States
211
Rep
4,319
Posts

Drives: 991 GT3 RS
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Living at (almost...) 9k

iTrader: (5)

Excellent data and analysis, looking forward to the rest of the story to come.
__________________
GT3 RS | Desperately seeking the next great M car...
Appreciate 0
      09-24-2013, 12:19 PM   #38
jcolley
Lieutenant
United_States
379
Rep
413
Posts

Drives: 328
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Maine

iTrader: (1)

I can't say thank you enough for this. Lilke most newly discovered / newly popular issues with our cars, it gets a lot of attention from both the naysayers an the chicken littles. It's a natural human reaction, but with time and a little concise evidence and information, it will become just another one of those things we deal with as part of ownership.

I've been emailing Sam at AutoTalent and he confirmed about $4/bearing and I suggested he may want to stock up...

Quote:
Originally Posted by regular guy View Post
Wait until I get the bearing photo database in place. You will get a chance to see all the ones I could find posted, along with a few you haven't. Some engine failures aren't reported on the forums, but do get mentioned in private emails amongst friends. A few months ago, there was a failure of a mostly stock M3. The rod snapped in half, and the big end of the rod was blue with heat damage. Those are clear signs of excessive heat due to lack of lubrication. There's others as well, but no permission yet to post the photos or details.
Here is a thread on M5Board doing just that. It was intended initially to only have pictures of bearings out of functional engines, but some others have been posted and serve as a warning of the extreme end.

http://http://www.m5board.com/vbulle...re-thread.html
Appreciate 0
      09-24-2013, 12:56 PM   #39
jbraslins
Latvian Gangstah
jbraslins's Avatar
88
Rep
570
Posts

Drives: 2009 E92 M3 Melbourne Red 6MT
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Wake Forest, NC

iTrader: (1)

Thank you!
__________________
2009 E92 M3 Melbourne Red 6MT
[SOLD] 2015 YMB BMW M3 M-DCT
[SOLD] 2010 Alpine White E90 M3 M-DCT
[SOLD] 2002 TiAg E46 M3 manual
Appreciate 0
      09-24-2013, 01:00 PM   #40
cambit
Private First Class
United_States
11
Rep
155
Posts

Drives: 2013 BMW M3 COUPE
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: San Francisco, CA

iTrader: (1)

thanks for this in-depth writeup. As a layman / Non-mechanic I understand none of this. Just tell me how much and who do I write the check to? MY2013 E92, July 2012 build.
Appreciate 0
      09-24-2013, 02:51 PM   #41
regular guy
Lieutenant Colonel
429
Rep
1,947
Posts

Drives: Sprint car
Join Date: May 2013
Location: California

iTrader: (0)

Mahle-Clevite White Paper Evidence

Mahle-Clevite White Paper on Bearing Clearance Issues

This quote comes directly from a Mahle-Clevite white paper on bearing clearance, then I'll summarize at the end.
For most applications .00075 to .0010” (three quarters to one thousandth of an inch) of clearance per inch of shaft diameter is a reasonable starting point.

...

Using this formula will provide a safe starting point for most applications. For High Performance engines it is recommended that .0005” be added to the maximum value determined by the above calculation. The recommendation for our 2.000” shaft would be .0025” of clearance.

...

High Performance engines on the other hand, typically employ greater bearing clearances for a number of reasons. Their higher operating speeds result in considerably higher oil temperatures and an accompanying loss in oil viscosity due to fluid film friction that increases with shaft speed. Increased clearance provides less sensitivity to shaft, block, and connecting rod deflections and the resulting misalignments that result from the higher levels of loading in these engines. Use of synthetic oils with their better flow properties
can help to reduce fluid film friction.

...

Use of these coated bearings may result in slightly less clearance than the uncoated CLEVITE 77® high performance parts for the same application. This will typically be in the range of .0005.” This is because the coating, although expected to remain in place during service, is considered to be somewhat of a sacrificial layer. Some amount of the coating will be removed during break-in and operation, resulting in a slight increase in clearance.
Here's what this means to you. If you run high horsepower and high RPM, then you need extra bearing clearance, not less of it. The coated bearings are great, but you have to size your journals for them; and as Alekshop mentioned in a previous thread, you shouldn't have coated parting lines. If you have coated parting lines you must remove the coating in this area before using these bearings.

Mahle-Clevite recommends adding an extra 0.0005 for good measure for high horsepower, high RPM, and coated bearing applications. To see some numbers in real life, please see the following examples.

Factory clearance: 0.00125
Factory clearance with Calico coated bearings: 0.00085 - 0.00105 (16-32% smaller).
Factory clearance with TriArmor coated bearigns: 0.00075 - 0.00095 (24-40% smaller).

Recommended clearance for mains (70mm journal):
0.00100/inch + 0.0005 = 0.00325
0.00075/inch + 0.0005 = 0.00256

Recommended clearance for rods (52mm journal):
0.00100/inch + 0.0005 = 0.00205
0.00075/inch + 0.0005 = 0.00153

So there you have it: ideal mains should be 0.0025 - 0.0032 and ideal rods should be 0.00153 - 0.00205. You're given 0.00125 clearance from the factory and some may be thinking of reducing it another 16-40% with coated bearings without sizing the journals because they believe it gives them extra protection. The extra protection is true if you kept all things the same including the bearing clearance; but reducing the bearing clearance by 16-40% to get the extra protection of the coating is not recommended.

Some Photo Evidence of Oil Starvation

Time to add some pictures to the discussion to see what a bearing looks like due to lack of clearance. The first few pictures come straight from Mahle-Clevite. Thanks to BMRLVR for posting the B&W version of the Clevite bearing failure guide. I found the color version of the same thing. It looks like the color version has better pictures, but the B&W version might have some better illustrations and explanations. So here's both versions for reference.

B&W: hhttp://www.wilmink.nl/Clevite/Clevite_lagerschade_tech_info.pdf
Color: http://catalog.mahleclevite.com/bearing

Using the color bearing failure guide, see example #12 "Oil Starvation / Marginal Oil Film Thickness." The two pictures below come from this example. According to Mahle-Clevite, the number-one cause of failure of this type is too little oil clearance.





Next, let's compare these reference photos to some actual S65 bearings from various engines. Where possible, the mileage and circumstances will be mentioned. These photos are all found in other threads on this forum.


Engine-1: Modifications unknown, stock internals, Mileage: 24,000.




Engine-2: Bone Stock, stock internals. Mileage: ~20,000

This bone stock engine suffered from main bearing failure. Notice the wear spot on the main bearing and the appearance of a channel the oil made to get around it. The connecting rod bearings aren't much better. Many of the connecting rod bearings show signs of excessive wear due to oil starvation (too little clearance).













Engine-3: Upgraded internals, supercharged, Mileage: 24,000






Engine-4: Stock internals, supercharged, Mileage: 72,000




Engine-5: Stock internals, supercharged, Mileage: 90,000



The connection between these pictures and the reference Mahle-Clevite pictures is obvious. Even though there can always be multiple causes of oil starvation and bearing failure, the number one cause of the damage shown in these pictures is listed by Mahle-Clevite as too little bearing clearance.

I have more photos that I will post in the Bearing Photo Database. I've got at least one set, maybe two sets of photos of broken (snapped) S65 connecting rods with the big end of the connecting rod turned blue due to excessive heat (oil starvation due possible bearing clearance).

I hope these photos have been helpful to see with your own eyes what this problem looks like, and why it's happening.
Appreciate 1
DrFerry6803.50
      09-24-2013, 03:02 PM   #42
kawasaki00
Lieutenant Colonel
kawasaki00's Avatar
United_States
234
Rep
1,673
Posts

Drives: SG-E92 ESS-650 BPM Tune
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Charlotte NC

iTrader: (11)

__________________
Electronics Junkie, Engine Builder.
Appreciate 0
      09-24-2013, 03:39 PM   #43
Malek@MRF
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
Malek@MRF's Avatar
United_States
740
Rep
3,732
Posts


Drives: E92 M3, E46 M3, G82 M4
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Irvine, California

iTrader: (5)

Thread of the year!!
__________________
BMW PERFORMANCE SPECIALISTS. Race Engines. Suspension. F/I. Brakes. Race Preparation. Factory Service. Alignments.
OFFICIAL PARTNERS: KW. MOTON. Brembo. AP Racing. BBS Motorsport. iND. HRE. Turner Motorsport. VAC. BMW Motorsport.

Facebook | Instagram | Yelp! | Flikr
Phone: 949-233-0448 | E-Mail: info@mrfengineering.com
Appreciate 0
      09-24-2013, 03:39 PM   #44
apecush
Lieutenant
Canada
30
Rep
522
Posts

Drives: 2008 E90 M3
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Edmonton

iTrader: (2)

By chance, has anybody done any research into the "why" of the tight clearances? As we know, bearing clearance and oil pressure are very closely related. Any plans to research whether the stock oil pump can in fact maintain the required flowrate when the clearances get opened up? I can see this short term "fix" going south in a hurry if all factors aren't considered. I'm not criticizing the work, obviously this is a huge benefit to the community, I'm just suggesting that some attention be paid to the big picture.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:35 PM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST