FORUMS
- 5
![]() |
|
![]() |
| 04-26-2011, 08:10 PM | #23 |
|
Brigadier General
![]() |
This could be perfect for your new project.
__________________
![]() 2008 AW/FR E90 M3-SOLD 2013 991 C4S-Produced, but not delivered. |
|
|
|
| 04-26-2011, 08:13 PM | #25 |
|
Major
![]() |
50lbs heavier than the Mustang, 25 heavier than the Camaro, 50 lbs *lighter* than the 6.0l CTS-V. I think the weight is fair. With 315mm max tire width on 18x10's, DCT allowed, and on the same spec line as the GTS which means retrofitting GTS part numbers to regular M3's is fair game, it should definitely be interesting, and expensive. The DCT might be key if it can withstand the abuse over a season of racing, aside from the obvious shift speed advantage, lap-after-lap consistency is a big advantage in any racecar.
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
| 04-26-2011, 08:42 PM | #27 |
|
Second Lieutenant
![]() |
Just out of curiosity why does the engine max out at 7800RPM instead of 8400RPM like stock E92? Could you raise the stroker to 8400 without major internal changes?
__________________
Fair Tax Supporter.
2009 E92 M3 MT (Gone) 2011 4 Runner Limited 4WD (Gone) 1996 4 Runner 4WD (Too sendimental to get rid of) 2013 E92 M3 MT (Current) |
|
|
|
| 04-26-2011, 09:37 PM | #29 |
|
New Member
|
That's the dilemma....As configured the car really makes sense for a Grand-Am team or someone who want's to. Or a really high end track toy. The owner has $90k on his mind. Considering what he has into it I understand. We'll have to find some flexibility if we want to move the car.
|
|
|
|
| 04-26-2011, 09:44 PM | #30 | |
|
New Member
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| 04-26-2011, 09:52 PM | #32 | |
|
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() |
Quote:
Can you give me a full spec list on the car? |
|
![]() |
|
| 04-26-2011, 10:20 PM | #33 | |
|
New Member
|
Quote:
Here are the pics I have on my system at home. I will send you a complete spec sheet when I get to the office in the morning. My apologies....my resizing skills need work! |
|
|
|
|
| 04-26-2011, 10:25 PM | #35 |
|
Mr. Nice Says Hello
|
the car is actually worth the price the owner is asking, quick disconnect harness, and everything you need to make it a full out race car
__________________
![]() BMW E92 M3 EVOLVE Stage II | EVOLVE X-Pipe | EVOLVE E-Tronic Exhaust Macht Schnell Stage II intake | KW V3 | Volk TE37SL | BMW Performance Spoiler |
|
|
|
| 04-26-2011, 10:27 PM | #36 | |
|
Major
![]() |
Quote:
That fuel cell location might be problematic under the Touring ruleset. Might be able to make a convincing case to the T-SS for an allowance for trunk-mounted cells a'la ITS E36 though, especially since a bunch of Grand Am chassis run with the cell there and the stock tank is a saddle-type tank. Crossovers from other sanctions are always a good reason to allow safety modifications that don't impact performance. I bet it would pass tech since it's not really their job to ensure compliance beyond a car built to the minimum safety requirements, but I think it'd lose a protest if somebody threw paper. Does that bar between the rear shock towers tie in to the cage mounting plate or is it welded directly to the chassis? After seeing pics of the car and with the $$$ engine in mind I think it might be better to sell the car as-is and start over with a Touring build in mind, got any spare E92 bodies-in-white laying around? ![]()
__________________
![]() Last edited by Richbot; 04-26-2011 at 10:47 PM. |
|
|
|
|
| 04-26-2011, 10:45 PM | #37 | |
|
Brigadier General
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
08 E90 | Jet Black / Black | 6MT
Mods: RAC RG63 w/ Pirelli Corsa 255F/285R | Akrapovic Evo Exhaust | OEM Blacklines Winter Setup: OEM 18s w/ Nokian Hakkapeliita R 245/40-18 |
|
![]() |
|
| 04-27-2011, 07:53 AM | #38 |
|
Major General
![]() ![]() |
How much is it putting down on a dynojet and what is the race weight with driver? I suspect it would land smack in the middle of NASA GTS5 and would not be particularly competitive, but something to consider if you haven't already...
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
|
| 04-27-2011, 12:11 PM | #39 |
|
Brigadier General
![]() |
When stroked, the pistons have to travel a greater distance in the same amount of time at the same RPM compared to a stock engine. So assuming the pistons could only move so fast, the redline must be lowered. I'm not sure what has to be done to keep the redline the same, but it wouldn't be cheap.
|
![]() |
|
| 04-27-2011, 02:16 PM | #42 |
|
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The redline on a stroker motor is still 8400rpm, just like the stock motor, but it makes peak power at a lower rpm than stock. I have the 4.6L RDSport motor in my car.
|
![]() |
|
| 04-27-2011, 03:18 PM | #43 |
|
Ground Pilot
Drives: e92 BMW M3 Join Date: May 2008
Location: Waverly, PA
|
Wow...now that's a track toy! It's kind of amazing that we can justify racing something like that. I would do this as well because there is something especially cool about racing a GT car, but it's hard to think that for $70K or so you can buy a Radical and go faster around a track.
__________________
"The laws of physics cannot be repealed, even with DSC." - BMW Owner's Manual
![]() |
![]() |
|
| 04-27-2011, 03:58 PM | #44 | |
|
Private
![]() |
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|