FORUMS
- 5
![]() |
|
![]() |
| 04-14-2011, 02:38 AM | #45 | |
|
Agent Smith
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
|
|
|
| 04-14-2011, 03:57 PM | #47 | |||
|
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
i just turned 21 yesterday, im still trying to figure out how i woke up in my bed this morning.... word of advice to all non heavy drinkers... STAY AWAY FROM PATRON Quote:
im running a c300 on SATA III now and it works wonderfully. |
|||
![]() |
|
| 04-14-2011, 05:19 PM | #49 | |
|
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() |
Well I am going to be taking my PC back to have a few things looked at this weekend. The XFX6950 is a non referenced card I realized which is not wht I wanted and the guy told me it was a referneced one. I want to run a water block on it later and non-ref cards are too difficult to find a full water block to attach to it. Also the 6950 is not giving great results after a few days of use. 3D mark benchmark was awful, so I ma taking it back and getting a 6970 since I cant flash the bios in the 6950 or even unlock the shaders or OC it at all XFX said. The new ones are locked 100%. Still some old ones out there though. OC GPU's dont really appear to be worth it in a lot of the result I have seen from people that are not running modified drivers and/or running liquid nitrogen systems during the 3Dmark tests which is totally rediculous. The average system seems to get minimal FPS increases with OC'd cards. Seems to be mostly for bragging rights just like inflated dyno numbers are on car boards from shops doing things they wont admit to.
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| 04-14-2011, 08:06 PM | #50 |
|
Agent Smith
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|