FORUMS
- 5
![]() |
|
![]() |
| 12-28-2009, 03:34 PM | #68 |
|
Private First Class
![]() |
Suggestion
All stock suspension is capable of 1.9+ so if you aren't tracking the car is there really a need for camber plates. On the other hand, if you want the flexibility of adjustments "on the fly" beyond 2.0 then plates are the way to go. TC Kline makes a set and so do some other race proven companies. Not putting down any companies, just mentioning options. On the track I run 2.0. On an autocross circuit I run 2.4 or so. Just my two cents.
- Stay thirsty my friends..
__________________
Last edited by manonfire; 12-28-2009 at 04:11 PM. |
|
|
|
| 12-28-2009, 04:44 PM | #69 |
|
Major General
![]() ![]() |
I highly doubt that you will get -1.9 on the stock suspension. Several people have tried, and were only able to get ~-1.3 after removing the pins. If you are lowered significantly, that might be a different story.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
|
| 12-28-2009, 04:58 PM | #70 |
|
Private First Class
![]() |
I got 1.9 on the left front and 1.8 on the right front. Verified and checked by two race shops, one in NJ and one in VA, prior to the camber plates. It is possible. And yes, I am lowered, cup springs only.
__________________
|
|
|
|
| 12-28-2009, 06:46 PM | #71 |
|
Major General
![]() ![]() |
Yep, lowering would change things. When I say stock suspension, I mean stock springs. With those, folks have not been able to get more than -1.3 or so.
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
|
| 12-28-2009, 08:34 PM | #72 | |
|
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I can confirm that. All stock e90 M3 just had alignment last week. Asked for max neg camber up front and ended up with -1.0 on the left and -1.2 on the right. Pre-alignment was -0.5 left and -1.2 right. Car with 6,700 miles, no accidents, no curbs or potholes. Bottom line: 1) Those of you seeing unequal tire wear, check your alignment first. 2) Max stock alignment negative camber (no lowering) is probably -1.2 to -1.4 range (without pulling pins). 3) We probably need to see more data on track tire temps before deciding what the optimal negative camber is for these vehicles (street tires not R-comp). |
|
|
|
|
| 12-28-2009, 10:33 PM | #73 | |
|
Private First Class
![]() |
Quote:
I hate waiting for the next track day.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
| 01-01-2010, 01:54 PM | #74 | |
|
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
| 01-01-2010, 02:08 PM | #75 |
|
Major
![]() Drives: M3 Join Date: May 2008
Location: Where the weather is always the same
Posts: 1,067
iTrader: (0)
|
Lol! I love your signature. I am tracking the car which is why I car about camber. Otherwise, no reason to mess with the car.
I will check regarding the 1.9. I don't need anything aggressive as this is not a track only car but I would like to have better handling (i.e. negative front camber) for the track. Especially for Laguna Seca. BTW, how much does a square setup (keeping the camber the same) change the pushing characteristics of the M3? |
![]() |
|
| 02-11-2010, 07:39 PM | #76 | |
|
Lieutenant
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
-3 deg is working out great for me. Last edited by RickyBobby; 07-06-2010 at 11:19 PM. |
|
|
|
|
| 02-12-2010, 10:32 AM | #77 | |
|
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Lucid
Quote:
Thanks, vz ps - Season is about to start provided we can get out of the snow........
__________________
![]() Track Toy Last edited by von_zoom; 02-12-2010 at 10:33 AM. Reason: Weather |
|
|
|
|
| 02-12-2010, 10:53 AM | #78 |
|
Major General
![]() ![]() |
The car's gone. I drove it for ~7000 miles with -2 camber without running into significant uneven wear issues on the street and the track. That strikes me as a happy medium for a street car that will be tracked off and on without worrying about camber re-adjustments.
__________________
![]() Last edited by lucid; 02-12-2010 at 11:13 AM. |
![]() |
|
| 02-12-2010, 12:52 PM | #79 |
|
Brigadier General
![]() |
I ran -2.1 on my e46 M3 on the street and never had any wear problems. I was running 265 front tire street and 275 for track. Not sure if that translates to the E9X M3, but I imagine I will have the same results.
__________________
![]() 2008 AW/FR E90 M3-SOLD 2013 991 C4S-Produced, but not delivered. |
|
|
|
| 02-13-2010, 12:30 PM | #80 |
|
Captain
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
[QUOTEThe car's gone. I drove it for ~7000 miles with -2 camber without running into significant uneven wear issues ..........][/quote]
Gone, I won't even ask. Thanks vz
__________________
![]() Track Toy |
|
|
|
| 02-13-2010, 03:40 PM | #81 |
|
Major General
![]() ![]() |
Nothing bad happened. Just traded it in for an M coupe. Will post a comparison later. Don't mean to take this thread off topic...
__________________
![]() |
![]() |
|
| 05-17-2010, 12:09 AM | #82 |
|
Brigadier General
![]() |
For the guys that pulled the front pins, any negative affects so far?
I was discouraged from pulling them from a very reputable race shop.
__________________
![]() 2008 AW/FR E90 M3-SOLD 2013 991 C4S-Produced, but not delivered. |
|
|
|
| 05-20-2010, 11:16 AM | #83 |
|
Major
![]() |
|
|
|
|
| 05-20-2010, 11:51 AM | #84 |
|
Brigadier General
![]() |
Not really, but it was at Kinetic Motorsport, its a serious race shop. Maybe he was just being cautious.
Im thinking of pulling them soon though. They were able to get -1.4 up front with the pins in. They set the rear to -2. They had the best equipment and took almost 1.5 hours to do the work. They were extremely careful and thorough with the work.
__________________
![]() 2008 AW/FR E90 M3-SOLD 2013 991 C4S-Produced, but not delivered. |
|
|
|
| 05-20-2010, 12:12 PM | #85 |
|
Major
![]() Drives: M3 Join Date: May 2008
Location: Where the weather is always the same
Posts: 1,067
iTrader: (0)
|
I had mine pulled and aligned. The car seems to pull to the right on most roads. I had the alignment checked and it was all correct numbers wise. Also, I had the tires swapped and had the same behavior. The explanation given was that the negative front/back camber makes the car more susceptible to the crown in the road.
Do other people notice the same thing? The shop I went to does great work so I am more concerned there could be something up with my car. Overall, the car pushes less and drives great (aside fromt he pull when I let go of the steering wheel). BTW, when I let go of the steering wheel, the steering wheel stays stable. It does not move so it is not a centering problem. |
![]() |
|
| 05-20-2010, 12:13 PM | #86 | |
|
Private First Class
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
| 05-20-2010, 03:00 PM | #87 |
|
Son what is your Alibi?
Drives: 2008 E90 M3 Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Lawrenceville, NJ/New Orleans, LA
Posts: 24
iTrader: (0)
|
Pulled the pins and took it in to get aligned today.
Got -1.7 out of the fronts and -1.9 on the rears, could have gone to 2.0-2.1 on the rears but toe couldn't be zero'd out if it went any higher than 1.9. Went with 1/16th total toe-in on the fronts. Notes: E90, Driver in car, and Full tank of gas. |
![]() |
|
| 05-20-2010, 10:57 PM | #88 | |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() Powered by M-World / AiM Evo4 Data Logger / KW Competition 2-Way / Brembo GT 365 / Pagid Yellow RS-29 / Rear Seats Delete Previous Mods: RBM3 / StopTech 380/355 / Moton Clubsport & Street Sport / Dinan Stage 1 / H&R Sport / M-World GT4 Aero / Eisenmann Sport & Race / Akrapovic Slip-On |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|