BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > M3 (E90 / E92 / E93) > General M3 Forum (E90 + E92 + E93)
 
BPM Sport
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      02-05-2006, 04:15 PM   #1
kprince
New Member
1

 
kprince's Avatar
 
Drives: 330i SG/Terra ZHP
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Boston


Posts: 14
iTrader: (0)

January CAR magazine checks in w/some info

Title of the article: 5 secrets of the new BMW M3

1. V8, 4.4 liters, 425 bhp. Engine based on M5 V10. 4.6 sec 0-60.

2. Initially will be offered with SMG or 6 MT, later w/DSG (under development)

3. Coupe and sedan to have very different appearance (coupe almost switched to M4 designation, but marketing gurus protested).

4. CSL version also forthcoming (lots of carbon fiber, maybe no rear seats)

5. No convertible, but maybe a wagon, due to new 3 series heavy hard top convertible.
Appreciate 0
      02-08-2006, 06:42 AM   #2
Dimitris
Private
Greece
0

 
Dimitris's Avatar
 
Drives: E90 320i
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Corfu-Greece


Posts: 81
iTrader: (0)



from CAR with love...
Appreciate 0
      02-08-2006, 08:07 AM   #3
RussianM3_dude
Private First Class
6

 
Drives: B7 Audi RS4
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Switzerland


Posts: 172
iTrader: (0)

I think the engine will be less then 4.4 BMW prides itself on more then 100hp/liter and they wont change. Current M3, M5, M6 are 100hp/liter + .
Appreciate 0
      02-08-2006, 01:25 PM   #4
maq
Lieutenant
United_States
9

 
Drives: MTA Monthly Pass
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC


Posts: 470
iTrader: (0)

No way BMW will drop the 100hp/litre trademark. Also I think they are sticking to the 0.5L per cylinder principle for the M cars.
Appreciate 0
      02-08-2006, 01:54 PM   #5
EnI
Secret Agent
39

 
EnI's Avatar
 
Drives: The Ultimate Joy Machine
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Planet BMW


Posts: 457
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by maq
No way BMW will drop the 100hp/litre trademark.
Absolutely correct!

I6 E46 M3, Z4 M = 343hp/3.2L = 107.2hp/L
V10 M5, M6 = 507hp/5.0L = 101.4hp/L

So we can with 100% probability expect new M3 to come with: 4.0L V8 405-430hp.
Appreciate 0
      02-08-2006, 02:03 PM   #6
ward
Major General
109

 
Drives: F
Join Date: May 2005
Location: T


Posts: 6,162
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by maq
No way BMW will drop the 100hp/litre trademark. Also I think they are sticking to the 0.5L per cylinder principle for the M cars.
except for the american E36 M3, 3.0 or 3.2 liters with 240 hp (europe did get 100hp/liter)
E30 M3 didn't hit 100hp/liter either
Appreciate 0
      02-08-2006, 02:34 PM   #7
Papa13
Go Gators!
United_States
65

 
Papa13's Avatar
 
Drives: e82 / e90 / e53 / e46
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tampa / SoCal


Posts: 1,467
iTrader: (5)

Garage List
2009 135i  [0.00]
My guess is 4.0 liter with 425-450 hp..

And the M5 is 0-60 in 4.0 in all the mags i have seen...

So the m3 should be a little quicker i think...
__________________
M-tech 330i JB/TERRA modded - RIP
n54 135i AW/CR JB3 FBO 420rwhp 444rwtq - 11.5 sec 1/4 mile @ 122mph - RIP
e53 X5 4.8is M///BLUE/M///SUEDE - 357awhp 369awtq - The Snow Beast!
n54 135i JB/CR JB4 FBO - tc kline coilovers - 1/4 mile and dyno PENDING
Appreciate 0
      02-09-2006, 12:56 AM   #8
maq
Lieutenant
United_States
9

 
Drives: MTA Monthly Pass
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC


Posts: 470
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ward
except for the american E36 M3, 3.0 or 3.2 liters with 240 hp (europe did get 100hp/liter)
E30 M3 didn't hit 100hp/liter either
Yep I'm aware of that. The 100hp/litre trademark started with the S50B32, which was also BMW's first double-VANO (now another M trademark) engine.

Technically, BMW Motorsport's first 100/litre engine was the McLaren F1's S70/3, which was basically two S50B30s as found in the Euro E36 M3 3.0.
Appreciate 0
      02-09-2006, 12:59 AM   #9
maq
Lieutenant
United_States
9

 
Drives: MTA Monthly Pass
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC


Posts: 470
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Papa13
My guess is 4.0 liter with 425-450 hp..
450? Not likely. Gotta keep some distance from the M5's 500hp. Not to mention a 150hp/litre V8's life spun is probably counted in hours.
Appreciate 0
      02-09-2006, 09:16 AM   #10
Oz
Lieutenant Colonel
United_States
31

 
Oz's Avatar
 
Drives: 2006 330i, 2004 X5
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Wayne, NJ


Posts: 1,770
iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2006 330i  [0.00]
Send a message via AIM to Oz Send a message via MSN to Oz
I would be interested in a BMW with DSG in the future...
__________________
2006 330i Steptronic/Alpine White/Black Leather/Burl Walnut Trim/Premium Package/iDrive/Heated Seats/Winter: STYLE 159 Blizzak LM-22 RFT/Summer: TBD
2004 X5 Steptronic/Alpine White/Grey Leather/Poplar Trim/Premium Package/Heated Seats/iPod Adapter
Appreciate 0
      02-09-2006, 10:44 PM   #11
kprince
New Member
1

 
kprince's Avatar
 
Drives: 330i SG/Terra ZHP
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Boston


Posts: 14
iTrader: (0)

Interestingly, instead of HP/liter, the magazine lists HP/ton

Ford Focus - 159 bhp
E30 M3 - 162 bhp
E36 M3 - 188 bhp
E46 M3 - 218 bhp
MB C55 - 228 bhp
Audi RS4 - 248 bhp
E90 M3 - 264 bhp
M6 - 284 bhp
Ferrari F430 - 338 bhp
Ferrari Enzo - 484 bhp
Bugatti Veyron - 506 bhp
Appreciate 0
      04-15-2006, 05:46 PM   #12
Damager
Guest

 
Drives:


Posts: n/a
I think its fairly well known that BMW V8s are quite strong engines. Now the V8 (especially derived from the new V10 platform) will be especially able to handle high revs for excessive amounts of time. I think in this case, it boils down to a question of marketing and if BMW cares about bringing the power (and torque, this is a V8 afterall) close to that of the M5.

I think with a 4.0L V8 in the M3, they could easily bring it to about 425-430HP. Then there is talk of using the turbo technology recently being employed by BMW across their engine range onto the M cars. These turbos are primarily intended to improve acceleration to bring the engines up on rev in the low ranges, but they would have an effect on top end power too theoretically, maybee bringing the car up to 450HP. Now does BMW want to sell an M3 with 450HP next to an M5 with 500HP. My head (pure speculation) says NO. So the car will stay at 420HP which gives it a decent difference from the M5 but still gives M3 buyers the ever important "value" card. What I mean is that M3 owners can still say "I get more per dollar then with an M5", which believe it or not still counts with alot of regular car buyers.
Appreciate 0
      04-15-2006, 06:25 PM   #13
Nushabeh
Guest

 
Drives:


Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by kprince
Interestingly, instead of HP/liter, the magazine lists HP/ton

Ford Focus - 159 bhp
E30 M3 - 162 bhp
E36 M3 - 188 bhp
E46 M3 - 218 bhp
MB C55 - 228 bhp
Audi RS4 - 248 bhp
E90 M3 - 264 bhp
M6 - 284 bhp
Ferrari F430 - 338 bhp
Ferrari Enzo - 484 bhp
Bugatti Veyron - 506 bhp
No question this is the most important factor here. I mean the engine can make 200hp/Litre from a 2.0litre engine, but if the car weighs 4000lbs, whats the use? The fact that the RS4 is listed as being 248bhp and E90M3 @ 264hp, already gets me excited about this car. Then factor in the fact that BMW drivetrains are the most efficient in the industry right now, means that bmw is giving us an Rs4 killer on a silver platter.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:19 PM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST