BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > BIMMERPOST Universal Forums > General BMW News and Cars Discussion
 
Stick to Clutch
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      08-29-2009, 11:35 AM   #23
amgthis
Tire Racks
 
amgthis's Avatar
 
Drives: AW 1M Coupè
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA

Posts: 1,228
iTrader: (0)

For the first time ever, I think the X6 M is the better looking car
__________________
Alpine White 1M Coupè
Gone:2006 Alpine White E46 M3 ZCP RIP
amgthis is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      08-29-2009, 06:15 PM   #24
zuggerat89
Still waiting...
 
zuggerat89's Avatar
 
Drives: OGV
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Monmouth County, NJ

Posts: 887
iTrader: (0)

I saw these at Habberstad in NY today, they look ok... I walked right passed both of them and didnt even notice them at first, never done that to an M car before... and I still dont understand the point of turbo charging them.

They dont even get good mileage for all the extra trouble. The EPA is 12 and 17, the M5's NA 10 cylinder does that for the most part. Why not just put a regular naturally aspirated 8 or 10 cylinder in there, keep the high redline, and the legitimacy of the brand image...?

Seems like purely green-ish marketing to me...
zuggerat89 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      08-29-2009, 06:51 PM   #25
ScotyH
Bimmer me up
 
Drives: 08 M3, 2010 GTR
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Edmonton,AB

Posts: 341
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by zuggerat89 View Post
I saw these at Habberstad in NY today, they look ok... I walked right passed both of them and didnt even notice them at first, never done that to an M car before... and I still dont understand the point of turbo charging them.

They dont even get good mileage for all the extra trouble. The EPA is 12 and 17, the M5's NA 10 cylinder does that for the most part. Why not just put a regular naturally aspirated 8 or 10 cylinder in there, keep the high redline, and the legitimacy of the brand image...?

Seems like purely green-ish marketing to me...
You're right about the mileage, but remember that the M5 is 1000 lbs lighter
ScotyH is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      08-29-2009, 07:32 PM   #26
graider
Colonel
 
graider's Avatar
 
Drives: py/kiwi e46 m3
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: toronto

Posts: 2,408
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by zuggerat89 View Post
I saw these at Habberstad in NY today, they look ok... I walked right passed both of them and didnt even notice them at first, never done that to an M car before... and I still dont understand the point of turbo charging them.

They dont even get good mileage for all the extra trouble. The EPA is 12 and 17, the M5's NA 10 cylinder does that for the most part. Why not just put a regular naturally aspirated 8 or 10 cylinder in there, keep the high redline, and the legitimacy of the brand image...?

Seems like purely green-ish marketing to me...
how does a 8L v12 with 8000rpm redline in the x6m with a beef up smg tranny sound? yummmy that is gonna be ton of torque

if bmw made a truck like this, I wouldn't care about gas mileage at all. i would buy it to two some stuff and drive the family around in style. lol
graider is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      08-29-2009, 08:15 PM   #27
positiveions
Lieutenant General
 
positiveions's Avatar
 
Drives: 09 MKV JETTA 2.5 & E90 M3 :)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: La Verne, CA

Posts: 10,416
iTrader: (1)

Send a message via MSN to positiveions Send a message via Yahoo to positiveions
I would think that BMW will have a better looking "M" wheels on the X5. They look too mundane.
But non-the-less, both cars look like a monster.
positiveions is offline   Lebanon
0
Reply With Quote
      08-29-2009, 08:53 PM   #28
graider
Colonel
 
graider's Avatar
 
Drives: py/kiwi e46 m3
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: toronto

Posts: 2,408
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by eatrach73 View Post
I would think that BMW will have a better looking "M" wheels on the X5. They look too mundane.
But non-the-less, both cars look like a monster.
I agree. the rims on both the x5m and x6m look worse than the upgraded rims on the standard x6. what the hell.
graider is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      08-29-2009, 10:21 PM   #29
zuggerat89
Still waiting...
 
zuggerat89's Avatar
 
Drives: OGV
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Monmouth County, NJ

Posts: 887
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScotyH View Post
You're right about the mileage, but remember that the M5 is 1000 lbs lighter
True, but now the point I was really getting to was theyre going to turbocharge all of the M cars and for what?

I'm sure they will be awesome cars but they aren't going to be "the same"
zuggerat89 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      08-31-2009, 12:38 AM   #30
MJC///M3
Colonel
 
MJC///M3's Avatar
 
Drives: 09 SSII E92 M3
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Bronx, NYC

Posts: 2,327
iTrader: (0)

no cross drilled rotors??
__________________
"You will get there, but it is up to you and you alone. It is what you are willing to do, and how you are willing to get there. You must be relentless, you must be tireless, you must pursue at all costs, so that you are ready, when the time is right." -Dad
MJC///M3 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      08-31-2009, 12:58 AM   #31
jopa489
BMW/Detailing Addict
 
jopa489's Avatar
 
Drives: Estoril F30 335i 6MT
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New England

Posts: 6,561
iTrader: (8)

So much awesome.
__________________

jopa489 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      08-31-2009, 07:37 AM   #32
rohms3
Lieutenant
 
rohms3's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 328i
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Long Island, NY

Posts: 523
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by zuggerat89 View Post
I saw these at Habberstad in NY today, they look ok... I walked right passed both of them and didnt even notice them at first, never done that to an M car before... and I still dont understand the point of turbo charging them.

They dont even get good mileage for all the extra trouble. The EPA is 12 and 17, the M5's NA 10 cylinder does that for the most part. Why not just put a regular naturally aspirated 8 or 10 cylinder in there, keep the high redline, and the legitimacy of the brand image...?

Seems like purely green-ish marketing to me...
Its a 5300 lb truck. The S82 can't come near the amount of torque this thing makes...
rohms3 is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      09-01-2009, 06:15 PM   #33
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn
Lieutenant
 
Drives: 1
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: 2

Posts: 469
iTrader: (0)

I just saw the X5M in person. Wow, I love it. Considering a Cayenne Turbo S has about the same hp, and is $50k more, the X5M is a hell of a deal.
nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      09-01-2009, 07:31 PM   #34
cloakster
First Lieutenant
 
Drives: 2012 VW GLI
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario

Posts: 393
iTrader: (0)

A 555hp SUV for $97k. I want one now
cloakster is offline   Canada
0
Reply With Quote
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:43 PM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST