BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > M3 (E90 / E92 / E93) > M3 Photos/Video/Media Gallery
 
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      12-26-2007, 03:58 PM   #23
lucid
Major General
lucid's Avatar
United_States
116
Rep
8,034
Posts

 
Drives: E30 M3; Expedition
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by swamp2 View Post
I would not acrgue that the price must be somewhere between the M Coupe and M5 but that tells us squat.
Agreed. It is obvious the M3 will be priced between the M coupe and the M5, but simply saying we'll split the difference and that'll be it for the M3 is weak. They should stick to testing cars rather than guessing pricing unless there is something they heard from an insider that they cannot disclose officially.
Appreciate 0
      12-26-2007, 05:02 PM   #24
JEllis
Brigadier General
JEllis's Avatar
84
Rep
4,788
Posts

 
Drives: E36 M3, E92 M3
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SD CA/Yuma

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by swamp2 View Post
+1. Although this car (and even more so the E90 M3) is a classic competitor with the RS4 that logic of the price being close to or based on the RS4 does not really make sense. The RS4 was such a low production volume and this certainky contributed to its relatively high price. Only comming loaded in the US contributed as well.

I would not acrgue that the price must be somewhere between the M Coupe and M5 but that tells us squat.

agreed
__________________
http://www.m3post.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic14547_7.gif
Appreciate 0
      12-26-2007, 07:56 PM   #25
drvai
Major
drvai's Avatar
United_States
31
Rep
1,266
Posts

 
Drives: E92 M3 AW
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: FL

iTrader: (0)

I want to beleive the fuel economy will be better than the older model, and that means there will not be any gg tax
Appreciate 0
      12-26-2007, 08:34 PM   #26
swamp2
Lieutenant General
swamp2's Avatar
United_States
215
Rep
10,201
Posts

 
Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego, CA USA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by drvai View Post
I want to beleive the fuel economy will be better than the older model, and that means there will not be any gg tax
Best recent evidence and extrapolations tell us it will certainly have a GGT and that it will be about $2k.
Appreciate 0
      12-26-2007, 10:47 PM   #27
Robert
Major General
118
Rep
6,902
Posts

 
Drives: 135i, current is350
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Socal

iTrader: (1)

Sounds like the 335i boys need Procede 5.0 to beat the 0-60 times.
Appreciate 0
      12-26-2007, 11:47 PM   #28
FifthStreetz
O! So Sour!!
FifthStreetz's Avatar
United_States
193
Rep
15,559
Posts

 
Drives: Fast 240z / Slow M3
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Fort Lee, NJ

iTrader: (24)

Garage List
2008 M3  [4.75]
it will probably be like 58-60K, since the M coupe is the entry model M at 50-51k i dout they will place the M3 at 55Kish but it wont be ridiculously high.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      12-26-2007, 11:49 PM   #29
JEllis
Brigadier General
JEllis's Avatar
84
Rep
4,788
Posts

 
Drives: E36 M3, E92 M3
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SD CA/Yuma

iTrader: (4)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbo View Post
Sounds like the 335i boys need Procede 5.0 to beat the 0-60 times.
Yeah, I heard with v5.0 you only need 150 octane gas, three intercoolers, and then you can run 0-60 in 3 seconds. That is if you dont mind going into limp mode five times a day.

I kid, I kid.... 335i is a wonderful BMW

Jason
__________________
http://www.m3post.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic14547_7.gif
Appreciate 0
      12-27-2007, 05:45 PM   #30
E90ice
Banned
E90ice's Avatar
51
Rep
2,004
Posts

 
Drives: 2008 335xi Coupe
Join Date: May 2006
Location: WA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbo View Post
Sounds like the 335i boys need Procede 5.0 to beat the 0-60 times.
Actually they already got 0-60 in 3.9 seconds with PROcede V2 and sticky tires.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      12-27-2007, 05:48 PM   #31
southlight
Moderator / European Editor
southlight's Avatar
607
Rep
6,748
Posts

 
Drives: BMW
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Germany

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbo View Post
Sounds like the 335i boys need Procede 5.0 to beat the 0-60 times.
Quote:
Originally Posted by E90ice View Post
Actually they already got 0-60 in 3.9 seconds with PROcede V2 and sticky tires.
Please, not another M3 vs. 335i discussion...


Best regards, south
Appreciate 0
      12-27-2007, 05:56 PM   #32
Voltigeur
MacroRisk
Voltigeur's Avatar
Australia
35
Rep
2,519
Posts

 
Drives: M3 E92 ED'09 / 335d Sport DD
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: TX

iTrader: (0)

4.1s R&T 0-60 seems too low

Quote:
Originally Posted by dechoong View Post
0-60 in 4.1s & 0-100 in 9.4s are barely believable. These numbers are in the 997 GT3's territory... and we've seen in a previous thread the GT3 smokes the M3.
That's my thought too. From swamp's and south's data list on 0-60mph, 0-100k 4.1 seems an outlier:

http://www.m3post.com/forums/showthr...=70737&page=11
__________________

Just thinking of something not so witty
///M3 E92 '09 Jerez Black | 6MT | Ext Fox Red | Tech | Prem | 19s |Heated Seats | iPod |Smartphone | Euro Deliv June 09
Sold: 540iT / 530i / 323i
Appreciate 0
      12-27-2007, 06:56 PM   #33
Robert
Major General
118
Rep
6,902
Posts

 
Drives: 135i, current is350
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Socal

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by southlight View Post
Please, not another M3 vs. 335i discussion...


Best regards, south
hahaha

Can't we have a little fun? Harmless fun, trying to elicit some response from procede crowd.

Quote:
+1. Although this car (and even more so the E90 M3) is a classic competitor with the RS4 that logic of the price being close to or based on the RS4 does not really make sense. The RS4 was such a low production volume and this certainky contributed to its relatively high price.
But doesn't the RS4 has a smaller demand than M3? If the supply of M3 is met with greater demand it can cause the price point approach RS4 territory. Pure speculation on my part.
Appreciate 0
      12-27-2007, 07:49 PM   #34
T Bone
Brigadier General
T Bone's Avatar
145
Rep
4,021
Posts

 
Drives: 2008 335xi Coupe
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The land where we kill baby seals

iTrader: (0)

Those numbers are really impressive.... Why do these guys get consistently better numbers than other rags?

Also, they don't seem to jive with some of the (few) videos that we have seen of the M3 in action.
__________________
"Aerodynamics are for people who cannot build engines"......Enzo Ferrari
Appreciate 0
      12-27-2007, 08:41 PM   #35
swamp2
Lieutenant General
swamp2's Avatar
United_States
215
Rep
10,201
Posts

 
Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego, CA USA

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by T Bone View Post
Those numbers are really impressive.... Why do these guys get consistently better numbers than other rags?
Like I screwed up in my recent post, it seems to me it is C&D that typically gets the best numbers.
Appreciate 0
      12-27-2007, 09:26 PM   #36
Robert
Major General
118
Rep
6,902
Posts

 
Drives: 135i, current is350
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Socal

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by T Bone View Post
Those numbers are really impressive.... Why do these guys get consistently better numbers than other rags?

Also, they don't seem to jive with some of the (few) videos that we have seen of the M3 in action.
Drivers.
Appreciate 0
      12-27-2007, 11:55 PM   #37
T Bone
Brigadier General
T Bone's Avatar
145
Rep
4,021
Posts

 
Drives: 2008 335xi Coupe
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The land where we kill baby seals

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by swamp2 View Post
Like I screwed up in my recent post, it seems to me it is C&D that typically gets the best numbers.

I honestly think the car companies give ringers to rags for reviews. We have some good drivers on this board and other boards, rarely do we see anything match between dragtimes and magazine reviews.
__________________
"Aerodynamics are for people who cannot build engines"......Enzo Ferrari
Appreciate 0
      12-28-2007, 12:24 AM   #38
aerisolphaln
First Lieutenant
United_States
4
Rep
396
Posts

 
Drives: '05 G35 coupe 6MT
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Iowa City, IA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by T Bone View Post
I honestly think the car companies give ringers to rags for reviews. We have some good drivers on this board and other boards, rarely do we see anything match between dragtimes and magazine reviews.
No, I really do think the magazine testers are as good as it gets outside of professional race car drivers and then the guys who test drive for BMW/Prosche/etc. If you put 99.995% of the drivers on any car enthusiast forum up against a magazine tester in any measured test, the magazine guy would win. It is, after all, what they do professionally for a living.
__________________
Now:'05 G35 6MT\Laser Red\Beige\Sport\Premium

06/2008: M3, 335+Dinan, or ...
Appreciate 0
      12-28-2007, 12:27 AM   #39
aerisolphaln
First Lieutenant
United_States
4
Rep
396
Posts

 
Drives: '05 G35 coupe 6MT
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Iowa City, IA

iTrader: (0)

Also, don't forget that the "rare" time that you do see something that approaches or equals the magazine time compared to "all of the other" times that are disappointments due to poor launch, traction, missed gear, etc; all of that business happens when the magazines are testing, too. They just report the one VERY best time they achieved after multiple instances of testing the car and having figured out everything just right for that *best run.*
__________________
Now:'05 G35 6MT\Laser Red\Beige\Sport\Premium

06/2008: M3, 335+Dinan, or ...
Appreciate 0
      12-28-2007, 12:52 AM   #40
T Bone
Brigadier General
T Bone's Avatar
145
Rep
4,021
Posts

 
Drives: 2008 335xi Coupe
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: The land where we kill baby seals

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by aerisolphaln View Post
No, I really do think the magazine testers are as good as it gets outside of professional race car drivers and then the guys who test drive for BMW/Prosche/etc. If you put 99.995% of the drivers on any car enthusiast forum up against a magazine tester in any measured test, the magazine guy would win. It is, after all, what they do professionally for a living.

I realize we are rat-holing into a Batman vs. Superman discussion but dragtimes represents thousands of enthusiasts and they post their best run of the day. I have not seen a stock M5 hit the E/T & Trap Speeds that R&T hit......

I don't think we will see a new STOCK 6MT M3 in the mid 12's at 115 mph on drag times (maybe at ATCO )
__________________
"Aerodynamics are for people who cannot build engines"......Enzo Ferrari
Appreciate 0
      12-28-2007, 01:11 AM   #41
e36jakeo
Captain
United_States
12
Rep
624
Posts

 
Drives: 2008 M3 6 Speed MT!
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern CA

iTrader: (0)

Considering the M3's acceleration times basically match a 3200 lb, 415 HP GT3 RS (1/4 mile in 12.1 @ 115 MPH) even though the GT3 has better traction and 10% better power to weight makes you wonder if the M3 is making a bit more than 415 HP or if its somewhat shorter gearing was enough to make up the difference.

Being a 335i guy, so far on street tires with Procede, LSD, intake and exhaust running on 100 octane a 335i coupe has managed to hit 114.8 MPH in the 1/4 mile. That car was making 407 WHEEL HP, so like I said, the M3 is putting down some serious power to hit that trap speed.

NICE! Will be even quicker with the shorter gearing allowed by 7-speed DCT!
__________________
Driving sideways: It's not faster, but damn it's more fun!
Appreciate 0
      12-28-2007, 01:22 AM   #42
swamp2
Lieutenant General
swamp2's Avatar
United_States
215
Rep
10,201
Posts

 
Drives: E92 M3
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: San Diego, CA USA

iTrader: (1)

I do agree that most magazine guys are probably a lot better at launching and draging (heck even general sporty driving) than most internet enthusiast forum members. Heck they simply get to beat nice cars, that aren't theirs, to death. I'd get better at draging if I had that luxury as well. At the same time the hundreds (maybe thousands) of pretty good folks hitting the strips and posting g-tech, etc. numbers should definitely represent enough statistics and talent to match the best mag numbers. I do not doubt for a bit that companies still give sleepers to the mags. Like I said previously, this is likely some combination of car, driver, sleeper/under-rating, great surface, etc. that we really will never be able to fully explain. I do still contend that the average reported figures are consistent with the stated weight/hp/gearing.
Appreciate 0
      12-28-2007, 01:53 AM   #43
Hans Delbruck
BMW & MB - friends in my garage
Hans Delbruck's Avatar
United_States
21
Rep
1,285
Posts

 
Drives: C63, 135i, 1959 BUICK
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Huntington Beach, CA

iTrader: (0)

I think R&T adjusts their actual achieved numbers for temperature, altitude and maybe some other factors. A lot of rags do this. They run every car's numbers thru a formula so that every car is tested under "equal" conditions (yeah right)

Also, their test driver is known for being very hard on cars. There may not have been much left of that M3's clutch or tires....

You just can't buy a car because of the test numbers one of the rags puts down. But the numbers are fun for bench racing!
Appreciate 0
      12-28-2007, 02:12 AM   #44
aerisolphaln
First Lieutenant
United_States
4
Rep
396
Posts

 
Drives: '05 G35 coupe 6MT
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Iowa City, IA

iTrader: (0)

^^^

Won't it be nice to just be able to buy the cars, drive them, and then post about our driving experiences???

BMWNA is sure putting the screws to us.
__________________
Now:'05 G35 6MT\Laser Red\Beige\Sport\Premium

06/2008: M3, 335+Dinan, or ...
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:25 AM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST