FORUMS
- 5
![]() |
|
![]() |
| 03-05-2013, 02:31 PM | #23 |
|
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
![]() |
If the C63 used the same 4.0 motor the M3 does it would need to be built also to make 750+ HP. The two platforms are very different. Much easier to make that level of power with a 6.3. We have two C63 AMG cars one is a black series and they can make very high power with the stock motor. Very impressive cars with boost.
__________________
|
|
|
|
| 03-05-2013, 02:33 PM | #24 | |
|
Major
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| 03-05-2013, 02:42 PM | #25 | |
|
Colonel
![]() |
Quote:
A stock motor Supercharged M3 will not safely make 670whp SAE on a dynojet no matter how much octane or boost you throw at it, maybe a dyna pack it can come close, as I made 650whp with the VT625 on that type of dyno, lol. There is not enough fuel to run 11psi or an E85 mix and the motor would grenade in no time, but cleary there is a HUGE gap performance wise between a VT2 and VT3, just as there is on the Weistec Stage 2 vs. Stage 3. As far as "built" I guess you could say that the specific Weistec Stage 3 that was in the vid has a built motor too, as it has the SLS internals with forged pistons. The only upgrades I have are simple drop in LC pistons, and rods, which actually lowers power, no boring out of the block or sleeving which costs more and can weaken it, and from what I've read and people I've talked too, those with sleeved motors burn excessive oil vs. keeping the stock block untouched and using the OEM piston manufacture to make the LC pistons. FWIW my car with the drop in pistons has not burned any oil I can't say the same about my friends with sleeved blocks. The major reason to do the the drop in pistons, rods and bearings is so I can run more boost and timing safely, that's the difference, as well as more fuel with the upgraded fuel system, which is essential once you get past 600whp. I wonder how much boost that Stage 3 is running, my buddies Weistec Stage 2 was running 7-8psi I believe. Either way I'm really impressed with those cars, there will be a 1000HP Weistec C63, built motor, at the shift-s3ctor event, he's a good friend, I'll run him, but I doubt I have much of a chance. It would be a fun run if the 800HP Stage 3 was able to go.
__________________
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP
ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ @ 7.2psi - 94 octane / Water meth ESS VT3-725 60-130MPH 6.64s - 620Whp/420Wtq@ 11psi ESS VT3-750 - 685Whp/466Wtq@13.5 psi SAE - 703WHP /478WTQ@13.5 psi STD Last edited by DLSJ5; 03-05-2013 at 03:14 PM. |
|
![]() |
|
| 03-05-2013, 02:43 PM | #26 | |
|
Colonel
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP
ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ @ 7.2psi - 94 octane / Water meth ESS VT3-725 60-130MPH 6.64s - 620Whp/420Wtq@ 11psi ESS VT3-750 - 685Whp/466Wtq@13.5 psi SAE - 703WHP /478WTQ@13.5 psi STD |
|
![]() |
|
| 03-05-2013, 02:47 PM | #27 | |
|
Major
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| 03-05-2013, 03:00 PM | #29 |
|
Colonel
![]() |
Thanks man, 11psi on a 11.3:1 CR motor with forged pistons is probably okay, but I wouldn't do it on 91, either way that car moves out, thanks for posting the vid.
__________________
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP
ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ @ 7.2psi - 94 octane / Water meth ESS VT3-725 60-130MPH 6.64s - 620Whp/420Wtq@ 11psi ESS VT3-750 - 685Whp/466Wtq@13.5 psi SAE - 703WHP /478WTQ@13.5 psi STD |
![]() |
|
| 03-05-2013, 03:25 PM | #30 |
|
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() Drives: 2013 e92 M3 Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kailua/Monarch Beach
|
Here's my compilation of runs against three very different AMG's last Saturday:
Run 1 vs stock 2013 C63 with Power pack Run 2 vs Stage 2 blown C63 Run 3 vs Stage 3 blown C63
__________________
Track/Airstrip: 2013 e92 M3 MW FR DCT ZCP / ESS VT2 625, MRF mid/Akra slip, StopTech BBK (573 RWHP STD @ 8,600 RPM)
Beater: 2013 WRX STi Sedan / Cobb Stg 2 / WRX wing lol |
|
|
|
| 03-05-2013, 03:56 PM | #32 |
|
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() Drives: 2013 e92 M3 Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Kailua/Monarch Beach
|
I asked Jim (the owner of the C) if he could make Shift Sector. He lives in the mid-west but he said his car will be here for another few weeks.
__________________
Track/Airstrip: 2013 e92 M3 MW FR DCT ZCP / ESS VT2 625, MRF mid/Akra slip, StopTech BBK (573 RWHP STD @ 8,600 RPM)
Beater: 2013 WRX STi Sedan / Cobb Stg 2 / WRX wing lol |
|
|
|
| 03-05-2013, 04:37 PM | #33 |
|
First Lieutenant
![]() ![]() |
The bottom line is you do not have to yank the motor out and replace the internals to get this kind of power.. we can always whine about displacement, compression etc... not being even..
How much are you VT3 guys paying for the engine modifications / labor (rods, pistons, etc??) to handle the extra boost? |
![]() |
|
| 03-05-2013, 05:38 PM | #34 | |
|
Colonel
![]() |
Quote:
http://www.weistec.com/m156scs3.html The upgraded internals on the S65 are not just to handle the additional boost/timing, but to safely make 640whp on 91 octane pump gas and not worry about blowing up an engine. There's more to it than simply saying you can make this much power on the stock internals, reliability and what fuel you have available is also a big factor too, and those that are DCT need to think about their transmission. I could make more power with my setup, but I'm not sure the DCT could handle the power. You can make good power on the stock S65 as well, but at levels above 8+psi, it will probably not last long on ANY octane or god like tune, especially with hard driving, that's the bottom line as well.
__________________
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP
ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ @ 7.2psi - 94 octane / Water meth ESS VT3-725 60-130MPH 6.64s - 620Whp/420Wtq@ 11psi ESS VT3-750 - 685Whp/466Wtq@13.5 psi SAE - 703WHP /478WTQ@13.5 psi STD Last edited by DLSJ5; 03-05-2013 at 05:48 PM. |
|
![]() |
|
| 03-05-2013, 06:51 PM | #35 | |
|
Private First Class
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| 03-05-2013, 07:05 PM | #36 |
|
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() |
__________________
Vf supercharger + tune/H&R coils/ Akra evolution exhaust/Volk te37/ Rs-3 tires/ Brembos /TIal BOV/ OSS blacked out headlights/LUX v3/Led taillights/ Challenge Front lip/ P3 vent gauge/ F10 m5 shift mob/Matte black front grills/ And a funky air fresher
|
![]() |
|
| 03-05-2013, 09:40 PM | #38 |
|
VT3
Drives: E36 M3 Track car,Ess E90 M3 DD Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The Couch
Posts: 5,866
iTrader: (5)
|
No Bro,Those C63s with built motors are crazy fast. Building a 6.2 motor isnt like building our 4.0 motors but i would love to see it run a 4.6 strocker VT3 motor.It would be an interesting run !
I might be building one of those soon,my car feels slow ![]()
__________________
![]() NO FEAR.NO LIMITS.NO EQUAL Ess VT3 LC built motor,Volk TE37SL,Challenge modefied Xpipe,Akra axle back CF tips. LOW BOOST 60-130 6.7 sec |
|
|
|
| 03-05-2013, 10:06 PM | #39 | |
|
First Lieutenant
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Yea I know it uses the SLS internals.. but the nice part about it is that it comes that way from the factory. regarding your 2nd paragraph.. I mean really? didnt you see my response saying "how long this engine will last is for a different debate" That shit is common sense bro. No need to explain that to me. The boss 302 seems to be most enticing for me. Forged internals from the factory with 750-900whp potential. If you blow it up, it will not cost you a fortune to rebuild. |
|
![]() |
|
| 03-05-2013, 11:54 PM | #40 | ||
|
Colonel
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
I like that car too, it's a lot easier to mod for big power from the factory, but RWD is always a bitch with big power.
__________________
08 E92 M3 DCT - Bolt Ons - 60-130MPH 10.71s - 11.88 @ 118MPH - 377WHP
ESS VT2-625 SC 60-130MPH 6.80s - 11.30 @ 129.3 MPH 586WHP / 379WTQ @ 7.2psi - 94 octane / Water meth ESS VT3-725 60-130MPH 6.64s - 620Whp/420Wtq@ 11psi ESS VT3-750 - 685Whp/466Wtq@13.5 psi SAE - 703WHP /478WTQ@13.5 psi STD Last edited by DLSJ5; 03-06-2013 at 12:28 AM. |
||
![]() |
|
| 03-06-2013, 12:52 AM | #41 |
|
Banned
|
I'm personally not to impressed with Wiestec stage 3 , it barley walked a Vt625
.... Heck a vt650 would have made the Benz look less impressive. Now the Delta between the 625 vs the Vt3 that's impressive , built motor or not that shit put a foot ball field on the vt625 , and if I remember correctly the Vt3 had boost leaks at this particular event.Hopefully we can see a match up between wiestec and the Vt3 M ![]() |
![]() |
|
| 03-06-2013, 01:30 AM | #42 |
|
Lieutenant Colonel
![]() |
I was honestly expecting a SC C63 to be > a SC M3...this vid was pleasantly surprising!
__________________
Euro Delivery Thread: '13 SANTORINI BLUE E92 ///M3--6MT/Speed Cloth/ZCP Current Car: '10 AW E90 335i MSport Former Cars: '07 Interlagos ///M5 / '09 135i / '10 E93 335i / '07 E90 335i |
![]() |
|
| 03-06-2013, 01:57 AM | #43 | |
|
Major
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
| 03-06-2013, 07:04 AM | #44 | ||
|
VT3
Drives: E36 M3 Track car,Ess E90 M3 DD Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The Couch
Posts: 5,866
iTrader: (5)
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() NO FEAR.NO LIMITS.NO EQUAL Ess VT3 LC built motor,Volk TE37SL,Challenge modefied Xpipe,Akra axle back CF tips. LOW BOOST 60-130 6.7 sec |
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|