BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > M3 (E90 / E92 / E93) > M3 vs....
 
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      02-09-2013, 06:30 PM   #89
DiavelM3
4 Star General -Twilight Zone
DiavelM3's Avatar
United_States
17
Rep
1,025
Posts

 
Drives: '11 E92 M3 ZCP
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: 5280

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by gblansten View Post
Car weighs 4000 pounds. They are probably thinking 'f**K it'.
__________________
'12 Ducati Diavel
'06 E46 M3 (sold) | '97 325is - Dinan (sold)
'02 Z3 3.0 coupe (sold)
Past - '84 Ferrari 308 GTSI | '88 Ferrari 328 GTS | '05 Dodge Viper Copperhead Edition #180/300 | Audi S4
Appreciate 0
      02-10-2013, 01:13 AM   #90
adc
Brigadier General
53
Rep
4,149
Posts

 
Drives: 2009 E90 M3 ED
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: MD/DC

iTrader: (6)

Quote:
Originally Posted by DiavelM3 View Post
Why haven't Mercedes (or Audi for that matter), gone with a Carbon Fiber roof like BMW has? Patent?
The main radon BMW did it, and never mind the press releases, is because they are experimenting with the best way to include composites into the regular manufacturing process. Not because they take 5 lbs off the roof of a 3700 lbs car.

They're just perfecting techniques for cheap and rapid CF manufacturing in preparation for the I3 which will be the first mass produced CF car. Mercedes doesn't care about that, they will just slap some turbos on a V8 and call it a day.
__________________

2009 E90 M3 ED
2014 X1 28i ED
Appreciate 0
      02-10-2013, 10:37 PM   #91
crabman
Captain
7
Rep
669
Posts

 
Drives: M3
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: WA

iTrader: (0)

I'm still kind of curious about the omission of a dual clutch. In 14 you can get one in the four door E but the C63 uhuh, makes no sense to me.
__________________
2012 E92 Space Grey with fox red/black/black, comp, premium, DCT, premium sound, sirius, heated seats.
Appreciate 0
      02-11-2013, 06:23 AM   #92
Gunzaro
First Lieutenant
Cyprus
5
Rep
308
Posts

 
Drives: Speed Racer
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: In transit

iTrader: (0)

This C63 507 craps on the M3 in terms of looks and engine sounds alone. Now it is just a couple of HP shy of a BLACK SERIES - using the same part# lightweight internals - and even has the option of some decent race metrics on the idrive. In terms of handling if you replace the skinny 255's with some wider Michelin PSS the coupe will keep up with a M3 with light power mods around a track.

What's more there is rumour that is 507 series will simply replace the P31 package in terms of price - it's what Benz do - option the heck out of the outgoing model so they eat some of the depreciation for you.

This is a proper and deserving finish to a mighty fine German muscle car.
Appreciate 0
      02-15-2013, 12:10 AM   #93
M3takesNYC
Banned
8
Rep
426
Posts

 
Drives: m3
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: NYC

iTrader: (0)

I don't agree re: why bmw used a CF roof. They used one on the CSL e46 and the previous M6. Plus its more like 20 pounds vs a steel roof and 45 compared to a moonroof but location of weight is everything. For example replacing the seats to lighter weight have virtually no real performance effect from a handling perspective given they are at the center of rotation of motion and really have negligble effect.

The lighter roof is still 20-45 pounds lighter and every 40 pounds counts no doubt. More important is it really is the highest aspect of the car and using the CF effectively lowers the car and although those small increases in performance may not be something obvious alone, when you take the 10-15 little things they did such as use plastic for front a rear bumpers/body work, aluminum pieces, aluminum brake hubs and floating rotors etc, all of that adds up to some real performance value.

In 2001 when the CF was being tested on the old M6, they were not even thinking about the I3/8 series and the e90 m3 was simply already going to take the CF given the M6 had it so it was a decision effectively made in 2001 with the M6.

Plus it looks great which is key!
Appreciate 0
      02-15-2013, 09:12 AM   #94
adc
Brigadier General
53
Rep
4,149
Posts

 
Drives: 2009 E90 M3 ED
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: MD/DC

iTrader: (6)

Quote:
Originally Posted by M3takesNYC View Post
I don't agree re: why bmw used a CF roof. They used one on the CSL e46 and the previous M6. Plus its more like 20 pounds vs a steel roof and 45 compared to a moonroof but location of weight is everything. For example replacing the seats to lighter weight have virtually no real performance effect from a handling perspective given they are at the center of rotation of motion and really have negligble effect.
That is incorrect. You are accounting only for mass that gets rotated as the car leans, but ignoring acceleration, braking and direction changes - in other words, inertia. Removing any weight from the car affects the performance. The question is how much weight, in relation to the weight of the car. A 20lbs roof difference is simply too small to yield measurable performance increases. Replacing the power seats with lightweight racing versions can reduce the weight by as much as 60lbs per seat, and that 120lbs becomes measurable, albeit still small.


Quote:
The lighter roof is still 20-45 pounds lighter and every 40 pounds counts no doubt.
The entire roof sheet metal weighs less than 30lbs so the difference is perhaps in the neighborhood of 20lbs, not 40.

Quote:
More important is it really is the highest aspect of the car and using the CF effectively lowers the car and although those small increases in performance may not be something obvious alone, when you take the 10-15 little things they did such as use plastic for front a rear bumpers/body work, aluminum pieces, aluminum brake hubs and floating rotors etc, all of that adds up to some real performance value.
First of all, the other small changes are applied to both the cars with CF roof and the ones without. Second of all, there is more weight difference between an option loaded car vs. a bare model than between a CF cr and a steel roof car.

What you are saying sounds entirely reasonable and by the book. However it is countered by the fact that there is absolutely no measurable performance difference between the cars with CF roof, and the ones without. Absolutely none.

Quote:
In 2001 when the CF was being tested on the old M6, they were not even thinking about the I3/8 series and the e90 m3 was simply already going to take the CF given the M6 had it so it was a decision effectively made in 2001 with the M6.
When they did the CF roof on the CSL, it made absolutely perfect sense in that type of car, because they went absolutely everywhere and took as much weight off as they possibly could, baring nothing. That car was some 400lbs lighter than the regular M3, which is very significant (12% weight savings). They literally left no stone unturned.

But 20lbs? that's just marketing, and good marketing at that because obviously you are buying it.

In 2001 BMW may have not known specifically about the i8 or i3, but they knew that in the future cars would become increasingly heavier due to the constant addition of comfort, convenience and safety features. The trend was as unmistakeable then as it is now. So they took a page out of the racing book, decided CF has definite advantages over steel, and went ahead to experiment and see how the two can be combined. And now they are almost to the point where they can make it commercially viable to make almost the whole body out of it, which was completely unthinkable in 2001.

Quote:
Plus it looks great which is key!
There is no doubt about that. BMW apparently prices the CF about the same as a moonroof, but had it been an option in the sedan, I don't think I would have paid for it.

I can guarantee you that if you drive a CF roofed model vs. the steel model back to back, you will not feel absolutely any difference, and your lap times will be more influenced by a headwind than the CF weight savings.
__________________

2009 E90 M3 ED
2014 X1 28i ED
Appreciate 0
      02-18-2013, 01:44 AM   #95
edu09
Major
edu09's Avatar
United_States
25
Rep
1,335
Posts

 
Drives: 2013 Frozen Black M3 ESS 650
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Doral, FL

iTrader: (4)

Garage List
[quote=Soorena;13414116]Fanboyish comments.

What makes you think it's going to be priced more than the BS? This seats below the BS.

Exactly right, the 507 edition stands below the BS so it should be obviously cheaper
__________________
2013 M3 E93 | Frozen Black, individual interior black with red stitching, Carbon Leather trim, M Double-clutch Transmission, Enhanced Premium Sound Sys
Mods: ESS VT2 650 SC / Akrapovic GT4 Exhaust / Brembo 365 kit / HRE RB2 wheels / Toyo R888 tires / KW coilover sleeve kit / OSS V4 kit / OEM Frozen Blk Rear Lip Spoiler / BMW Performance Black Grilles / BMW Wind Deflector / FB Vorsteiner Front Spoiler / FB side gills

Last edited by edu09; 02-18-2013 at 01:50 AM.
Appreciate 0
      02-20-2013, 04:26 AM   #96
DiscoZ
Second Lieutenant
DiscoZ's Avatar
Canada
3
Rep
273
Posts

 
Drives: C63 AMG PP, F25 X3
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: T.Dot

iTrader: (0)

Since too many want to get their $0.02 in defending their own car, and do not bother to read, I have attempted to correct some popular misconceptions. I USED to have a E92 M3 and was a bit of a fan boy like you. However, I educated myself and now drive a C63 AMG PP.

1. You CAN get a LSD for a C63, mine was part of a package with more HP, SLS internals, different brakes, carbon fibre bits, etc.

2. Many C63's are tracked, I see less on tracks and there are also less C63s around than M3s.

3. The revised 2012+ C63 AMG with the performance package is ACTUALLY FASTER than the E92 M3 on the 'ring and a few other tracks. It is slower on some tracks. So this M3 = always win BS is very tiresome, annoying and quite illiterate to be honest.

4. My C63 feels just as planted as my M3 at higher speeds, I've taken it to 250km/h on the back straight at Mosport.

5. The stock tire sizes on the C63 ARE a joke, but can be upsized and are more manageable then. My track tires are 245/275 NT01s.

6. Yes, the C63 can overheat on a track where there is not good airflow (they are fixing this) as it runs hot due to poor air flow through the motor, evidently.

7. The 2012+ C63 PP lost to the M3 in C&D mostly on price - go read the review again. Guess what, it's actually cheaper than a M3 in Canada when fully equipped; what does that mean then?

8. The M156 was not designed for HP/litre competitions. C63's routinely hit 500+ whp with basic mods, the motor is very undertuned. As you know, the SLS AMG BS makes 622hp. The motor was designed to be free and high revving (is oversquare) and have readily available torque.

9. The 507 edition is apparently a replacement for the performance / development package (PP in Canada includes the LSD), so it will likely be around the same price as a performance package equipped C63.

My anecdotal, personal experience is the C63 (2012+) with the performance package is a better overall driver than the M3 and can easily hold its own on the track, especially a longer HP track. The M3 on the track with all M goodies on is more connected and a tad more nimble. I find the C63 PP's brakes to be superior to the M3's and I find it has more steering feel.

I have no qualifiers such as experience selling cars or owning certain cars etc. to back my opinion, as they are irrelevant.
__________________
Current: 2012 C63 AMG PP | 2012 F25 X3
Past: 2008 E92 M3 | 2009 E90 335i | 2007 Z4MC | 2002 GTI 1.8T | 2000 Celica GT-S | 1999 328i | 1990 Corrado G60

Last edited by DiscoZ; 02-20-2013 at 03:25 PM. Reason: Grammar / spelling.
Appreciate 0
      02-20-2013, 07:57 AM   #97
aussiem3
Lieutenant Colonel
aussiem3's Avatar
Australia
30
Rep
1,684
Posts

 
Drives: Goggomobil
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kangaroo land

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2014 BMW X5 30d  [0.00]
2007 E92 M3  [0.00]
There are always people who think the grass is greener on the other side.

Like I've said before, I bought an ///3 to please myself and enjoy driving one. Do I care what AMG and Quattro Sports are doing? No. Yes, I read out of curiosity when there is a comparison or head-to-head. That's where it starts and stop. Enjoy what you have.

All those who think AMG make great cars, I challenge you to go out and buy one at the sticker price. You bought the ///3 because that what you want and that's what you can afford. If not you will not be on this board.

I love my ///3. Thank you very much.
__________________

2007 E92 6MT - Silverstone II with /// Performance Exhaust with ACM Test Pipes and BPM Sport Stage II Dev-Tune - Proper engine warm up, 12-monthly oil change, Castrol TWS 10w-60
2014 F15 X5 3.0d
Appreciate 0
      03-25-2013, 09:13 AM   #98
CSanto
Lieutenant Colonel
35
Rep
1,895
Posts

 
Drives: 2009 E92 M3
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: New York

iTrader: (2)

When does official pricing come out?

If it really does replace the PP, I honestly may be getting one. Anyone have any contacts at MB dealers on Long Island? I need to test drive a C63 PP!
Appreciate 0
      03-29-2013, 04:47 AM   #99
e92_m3
Lieutenant Colonel
38
Rep
1,560
Posts

 
Drives: 2009 e92 m3
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bay Area, California

iTrader: (0)

Mercedes really wants to end up with this c63 507 edtion with a bang! Their special edition has the upgrades we BMW owners are definitely looking for, not limited frozen colors...
__________________

Hellaflush? All I could say is "effyo'flush","flushnuff", and Instead of 'illest', I'm calling it "faillest". It's just form over function nowadays...
-END RANT
Appreciate 0
      03-29-2013, 09:35 AM   #100
adc
Brigadier General
53
Rep
4,149
Posts

 
Drives: 2009 E90 M3 ED
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: MD/DC

iTrader: (6)

Quote:
Originally Posted by e92_m3 View Post
Their special edition has the upgrades we BMW owners are definitely looking for, not limited frozen colors...
Actually, I'm looking for a more aggressive suspension option, better brakes and much less weight. Not power.

If BMW offered something like this as the last gasp for the E92 M3, I would literally be running to the dealer to place an order. In orange, or frozen blue.
__________________

2009 E90 M3 ED
2014 X1 28i ED
Appreciate 0
      03-29-2013, 09:13 PM   #101
NikB316
Lieutenant
NikB316's Avatar
14
Rep
596
Posts

 
Drives: 2014 M5 Competition
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Somerset County, New Jersey

iTrader: (4)

When will Benz have a DCT? Until then I wouldn't buy one even if it had 1000hp and was $70k. Huge dissapointment that the rumors of the new E63 having a DCT were false. Rear biased AWD + ton of power + DCT = ultimate daily IMO. They are sooooo boring to drive. I don't know how anyone who actually likes to drive would take one over an M or even an RS audi for that matter. I know obviously a factory car is a factory car but slap on an entry level blower for $10k on an M3 and you will destroy a 507 C63 and have a hell lot more fun driving it.
__________________

2014 M5 Competition Alpine/Sakhir
BMS Tune. Undercover Performance Custom Downpipes & Connector. H&R 10mm Spacers. BMW CF Rear Spoiler. IND Cosmetics. ALP & BEL Radar & Laser.
2011 Space Grey E92 M3 AA Gen 2 Lvl 3 586whp 398wtq SAE (sold)
Appreciate 0
      04-16-2013, 12:02 AM   #102
pkimM3r
Banned
pkimM3r's Avatar
95
Rep
7,321
Posts

 
Drives: m3 saloon in granny mode.
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lost angeles

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by CptSlow
Quote:
Originally Posted by serranot View Post
BMW does "Lime Rock," while Mercedes innovates. Nice car.
This is why this is my last BMW. They're now copying Audi with model designations, and far trailing MB in technical development. BMW is the fat, lazy, arrogant, slob of the German car companies.
Actually the merc drives like the fat arrogant slob.

So you pay more for a special edition and end up slower because you get less traction?
Its not all about hp and torque. Im confused at the number of ppl who just dont get it.

But i wouldnt buy lime rock neither.
Appreciate 0
      04-16-2013, 05:19 AM   #103
Soorena
Captain
No_Country
18
Rep
847
Posts

 
Drives: M3 6MT
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Paris

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by pkim1079 View Post
Actually the merc drives like the fat arrogant slob.

So you pay more for a special edition and end up slower because you get less traction?
Its not all about hp and torque. Im confused at the number of ppl who just dont get it.

But i wouldnt buy lime rock neither.
He isn't saying that the M3 is a fat and lazy. He was talking about BMW. And he's right.
Appreciate 0
      04-16-2013, 07:28 AM   #104
gthal
Brigadier General
gthal's Avatar
Canada
77
Rep
3,465
Posts

 
Drives: 2015 M4
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada

iTrader: (2)

Garage List
2011 M3  [3.37]
Quote:
Originally Posted by pkim1079 View Post
Actually the merc drives like the fat arrogant slob.
Really now... thank you for the informed and unbiased opinion!!
__________________
2015 M4 | Austin Yellow | Black Full Merino Leather | DCT
2014 Corvette Stingray | Z51 | Torch Red | 7MT - Sold
2012 MB C63 Coupe | Performance package | Obsidian Black - Sold
2011 E92 M3 | Jerez Black | Fox Red | DCT | Competition Package - Sold
Appreciate 0
      04-16-2013, 08:59 PM   #105
pkimM3r
Banned
pkimM3r's Avatar
95
Rep
7,321
Posts

 
Drives: m3 saloon in granny mode.
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: lost angeles

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by gthal View Post
Really now... thank you for the informed and unbiased opinion!!
lol...I also said that i wouldn't dare buy that lime rock not so special edition.

but the rest of the merc lineup - aren't they fat and slobbish too? I mean they are boats with super powerful engines. just a german muscle car.

but seriously...more power in a car that already thrashes the tires? maybe instead of power they should focus on suspension.
Appreciate 0
      04-16-2013, 09:10 PM   #106
gthal
Brigadier General
gthal's Avatar
Canada
77
Rep
3,465
Posts

 
Drives: 2015 M4
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada

iTrader: (2)

Garage List
2011 M3  [3.37]
Quote:
Originally Posted by pkim1079 View Post
lol...I also said that i wouldn't dare buy that lime rock not so special edition.

but the rest of the merc lineup - aren't they fat and slobbish too? I mean they are boats with super powerful engines. just a german muscle car.

but seriously...more power in a car that already thrashes the tires? maybe instead of power they should focus on suspension.
You should get educated on the cars before commenting. You are repeating rhetoric and not facts. Yes, the larger AMGs (E63, etc) are big powerful sedans... so is the M5. The C63 is not. The suspension in the C63 coupe is as capable as the M3's suspension. What you are saying is simply not true any longer. You are so 2008!!
__________________
2015 M4 | Austin Yellow | Black Full Merino Leather | DCT
2014 Corvette Stingray | Z51 | Torch Red | 7MT - Sold
2012 MB C63 Coupe | Performance package | Obsidian Black - Sold
2011 E92 M3 | Jerez Black | Fox Red | DCT | Competition Package - Sold
Appreciate 0
      04-16-2013, 09:50 PM   #107
Rev ///Me
My V8 Brings All the Boys to the Yard.
United_States
50
Rep
1,180
Posts

 
Drives: Something
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Somewhere

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by gthal View Post
You should get educated on the cars before commenting. You are repeating rhetoric and not facts. Yes, the larger AMGs (E63, etc) are big powerful sedans... so is the M5. The C63 is not. The suspension in the C63 coupe is as capable as the M3's suspension. What you are saying is simply not true any longer. You are so 2008!! :thumbsup:
Lets not go that far. It's close, but it's still not as balanced.
Appreciate 0
      04-16-2013, 10:09 PM   #108
gthal
Brigadier General
gthal's Avatar
Canada
77
Rep
3,465
Posts

 
Drives: 2015 M4
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada

iTrader: (2)

Garage List
2011 M3  [3.37]
Quote:
Originally Posted by ShutUpandDrive View Post
Lets not go that far. It's close, but it's still not as balanced.
Fair enough... but it is very close.
__________________
2015 M4 | Austin Yellow | Black Full Merino Leather | DCT
2014 Corvette Stingray | Z51 | Torch Red | 7MT - Sold
2012 MB C63 Coupe | Performance package | Obsidian Black - Sold
2011 E92 M3 | Jerez Black | Fox Red | DCT | Competition Package - Sold
Appreciate 0
      04-16-2013, 11:56 PM   #109
bruce.augenstein@comcast.
Lieutenant Colonel
21
Rep
1,907
Posts

 
Drives: Legacy GT - 13.704@99.39
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Manheim, PA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by pkim1079 View Post
...but seriously...more power in a car that already thrashes the tires? maybe instead of power they should focus on suspension.
Power climbs from 451 to 507, but torque barely moves (from 443 to 450). You should educate yourself on the difference before making comments on tire thrashing.

Bruce
Appreciate 0
      04-17-2013, 08:49 AM   #110
Iplayedmyself
Not fast enough if everything isnt a blurr
United_States
0
Rep
99
Posts

 
Drives: was-08 e90 335xi, now-08 e90m3
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: NY

iTrader: (0)

If it's so special edition why would they up the hp output but do nothing to suspension on a car that in my opinion does not compare handling wise to an M
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:37 AM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST