Login


08302007, 07:51 AM  #1 
Moderator / European Editor
741
Rep 6,747
Posts 
M3 Test in Autobild
New Autobild issue in Germany features a test where the M3 is compared to S5.
In short the author did like the M3 very much, his verdict was: "The S5 impresses, the M3 wows..." The numbers: 0100 km/h: 4.9s 0200 km/h: 15.7s 1000km/h: 33.4m  34m fuel consumption: 13.2 l/100km (=17.8 mpg (US)  21.4 mpg (UK)) which equals a reach of 480km Best regards, south 
08302007, 08:25 AM  #3 
Moderator / European Editor
741
Rep 6,747
Posts 
Here are the S5 times:
0100km/h: 5.1s 0200km/h: 19.0s 1000 km/h: 34.0m  34.4m Fuel consumption: 13.7 l /100 km (=17.2 mpg (US)  20.6 mpg (UK)) reach: 460km Autozeitung's M3 test comes next wednesday... Best regards, south 
Appreciate
0

08302007, 08:46 AM  #5 
Reincarnated
102
Rep 4,227
Posts 
Thanks
__________________

Appreciate
0

08302007, 09:45 AM  #9 
Major General
132
Rep 8,034
Posts 

Appreciate
0

08302007, 10:11 AM  #11  
Moderator / European Editor
741
Rep 6,747
Posts 
Quote:
Quote:
S5 46.975 € M3 56.008 € Best regards, south 

Appreciate
0

08302007, 01:04 PM  #14  
Moderator / European Editor
741
Rep 6,747
Posts 
Quote:
No slalom numbers in this Autobild test. S5 did get 2 points less than M3 in comfort rating. That must be due to the EDC they highly recommend for that matter... Best regards, south 

Appreciate
0

08302007, 01:53 PM  #15 
Lieutenant
21
Rep 563
Posts
Drives: 2007 E92 M3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: London

[quote=Just_me;1341606]excellent, best time yet.
QUOTE] I'm sure I'm missing something here... which time are you talking about? 4.9s BMW's claimed time, isn't it? 
Appreciate
0

08302007, 02:47 PM  #16 
Captain
93
Rep 621
Posts 
Sorry for not being clear. Im speaking of 0200km/h times. 0100 doesnt intrest me much
Last edited by Just_me; 08302007 at 03:16 PM. 
Appreciate
0

08302007, 11:59 PM  #17  
Lieutenant
5
Rep 408
Posts 
Quote:


Appreciate
0

08312007, 08:06 AM  #19 
Moderator / European Editor
741
Rep 6,747
Posts 
How did you find me here. I only now realized where I know you nickname from...
To be honest, the S5 won due to the lower costs compared to M3. In total 472 points for the S5, 464 for the M3. Without costs the result is 355points for S5 and 367 for the M3. Like the author said: The M3 wins, but only if it doesn't depend on a couple grands... Best regards, south 
Appreciate
0

08312007, 08:16 AM  #20 
Lieutenant
43
Rep 572
Posts 
BUT: S5 won the test against the M3 "only" because of its lower costs in the cost branch and not because its the better car overall...the M3 is much much more sportscar than the S5...and the test(er)drive stated "if he had the chance to decide between the two he would to 100% go to his bank (or to his hereditary uncle) to get the M3 instead of the S5
UliHH 
Appreciate
0

08312007, 08:44 AM  #21 
Colonel
175
Rep 2,730
Posts
Drives: BMW Coupe
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boynton Beach

Errr I think the M3 won. Even if its a matter of cost these 2 cars are in the same cost bracket. If you can afford the S5 you can afford the M3 so the M3 won.
__________________

Lack of money is not the problem. It is merely a symptom of what's going on inside of you!  T Harv Eker 
Appreciate
0

08312007, 09:21 AM  #22 
Moderator
878
Rep 15,113
Posts 
Not completely on topic but: I wonder what mods exist for the 4.2L Audi V8? Can it be made to hit 400hp with boltons?
__________________
A genuine BMW effeightzero with them tandem clutches in the transmission and that dad gum sun roof on the topa da cawr.

Appreciate
0

Post Reply 
Bookmarks 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 

