Crazy Jimmy criticizing the White House?

[mspeasl]

Someone needs to check hell's temperature. I do believe that it just froze over


http://news.yahoo.com/jimmy-carter-a...-politics.html

[xbook]

Are you completely unable to show even the smallest amount of respect for a former president of the USA? How about "Former President Carter Criticizes the Current Adminstration". Nope, it has to be an insult. Way to show your patriotic colors there Mrs.Peasl.

[mspeasl]

Originally Posted by xbook

Are you completely unable to show even the smallest amount of respect for a former president of the USA? How about "Former President Carter Criticizes the Current Adminstration". Nope, it has to be an insult. Way to show your patriotic colors there Mrs.Peasl.

I do believe the current WH has set the presidence for respect of former presidents. Besides, Carter created his own hell by sitting in the Rose garden for 444 days. To think that I voted for him the over Ford

BTW: Sorry I'm straight, I live in the Midwest

[xbook]

Originally Posted by mspeasl

I do believe the current WH has set the presidence for respect of former presidents. Besides, Carter created his own hell by sitting in the Rose garden for 444 days. To think that I voted for him the over Ford

BTW: Sorry I'm straight, I live in the Midwest

Please explain this. You are saying that because you feel the current administration is showing disrespect to former presidents, thus you can call a former president names. That is a very immature response, sounds like something my nephew would have said when he was 6.

It is impossible to take anything you say seriously when you lace it with bias. We can try and debate policies and politics, but when you are just calling our former leaders names, you leave no room for debate.

[OldArmy]

Jimmy's main contribution was as a placeholder until Ronnie Reagan was ready. Since then he's made a career of finding and celebrating what's wrong with America while ignoring the acts of lesser nations.

Of course he did have an epic battle involving a rabbit and an oar. Stuff of legends.

[mspeasl]

Originally Posted by xbook

Please explain this. You are saying that because you feel the current administration is showing disrespect to former presidents, thus you can call a former president names. That is a very immature response, sounds like something my nephew would have said when he was 6.

It is impossible to take anything you say seriously when you lace it with bias. We can try and debate policies and politics, but when you are just calling our former leaders names, you leave no room for debate.

Typical. Attack the poster instead of discussing the topic

[xbook]

Originally Posted by mspeasl

Typical. Attack the poster instead of discussing the topic

This isn't an attack, it's asking you to back up your claim. Can you back up the claim that you made earlier that the current White House has set the precedent for showing disrespect to former US Presidents?

When you use the "2wrongs make a right" defense, then be aware that to some it might sound like you are a 6 year old. If that's an attack to you, you need thicker skin, Mrs.Peasl.

[Sidney]

Originally Posted by xbook

This isn't an attack, it's asking you to back up your claim. Can you back up the claim that you made earlier that the current White House has set the precedent for showing disrespect to former US Presidents?

When you use the "2wrongs make a right" defense, then be aware that to some it might sound like you are a 6 year old. If that's an attack to you, you need thicker skin, Mrs.Peasl.

waa waa waa

I thought OP was funny. Didn't realize it put my Patriot License is at risk.

[mspeasl]

Originally Posted by xbook

This isn't an attack, it's asking you to back up your claim. Can you back up the claim that you made earlier that the current White House has set the precedent for showing disrespect to former US Presidents?

When you use the "2wrongs make a right" defense, then be aware that to some it might sound like you are a 6 year old. If that's an attack to you, you need thicker skin, Mrs.Peasl.

Spin, spin, spin............ it seems that is what Mr Carter is doing also. Don't you agree?

[JesterEXW]

It really just goes to show that people are very unaware of how reliable drones really are. The term "drone" and "UAV" scare people because they are ignorant. The fact is that the AGM 114 hellfire missile is great for surgical placement to help minimize collateral damage, this is what Predators use. Compare the innocents killed by drone strikes to any other type of bombing and drones come out with a much cleaner record. That being said, how does he justify condemning these operations but not all other military action? There is no rational logic to be found, it is ignorance breeding contempt for a system he does not understand.

This is not to say he is a bad guy, just that his argument is a weak and illogical one.

[alms211]

Originally Posted by xbook

This isn't an attack, it's asking you to back up your claim. Can you back up the claim that you made earlier that the current White House has set the precedent for showing disrespect to former US Presidents?

When you use the "2wrongs make a right" defense, then be aware that to some it might sound like you are a 6 year old. If that's an attack to you, you need thicker skin, Mrs.Peasl.

2x(chromosome)book. Found a little picture for you.