BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > M3 (E90 / E92 / E93) > General M3 Forum (E90 + E92 + E93)
 
Racewerkz Engineering
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      07-12-2007, 08:10 AM   #1
RussianM3_dude
Private First Class
 
Drives: B7 Audi RS4
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Switzerland

Posts: 172
iTrader: (0)

Car magazine blog on new M3.

Oh dear...

http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/post.php?sid=854
RussianM3_dude is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      07-12-2007, 08:15 AM   #2
moss
Private First Class
 
Drives: Audi RS4
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: England

Posts: 119
iTrader: (0)

No point posting that her - it will be shouted down as rubbish!
moss is offline   United Kingdom
0
Reply With Quote
      07-12-2007, 08:34 AM   #3
Just_me
Captain
 
Drives: RWD
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sweden

Posts: 604
iTrader: (0)

135i ist available for tests yet so how can he be so sure about 135i, by looking at numbers only?
Just_me is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      07-12-2007, 08:39 AM   #4
moss
Private First Class
 
Drives: Audi RS4
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: England

Posts: 119
iTrader: (0)

True enough - I think the size and expected weight etc.. makes the 135i a very interesting propostition - also should be much cheaper to buy and own :@)
moss is offline   United Kingdom
0
Reply With Quote
      07-12-2007, 08:47 AM   #5
RussianM3_dude
Private First Class
 
Drives: B7 Audi RS4
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Switzerland

Posts: 172
iTrader: (0)

And proper brakes this time... AND possibly the M LSD.
RussianM3_dude is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      07-12-2007, 07:37 PM   #6
JEllis
Brigadier General
 
JEllis's Avatar
 
Drives: E36 M3, E92 M3
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: SD CA/Yuma

Posts: 4,698
iTrader: (4)

More expensive, more power to make up for added weight, and overall bigger while adding luxury....hmmm when was the last time an M3 had that taped to its head. Oh yeah, the last M3 that came out...oh and the one before that....this ish is getting old

Jason
__________________
http://www.m3post.com/forums/signaturepics/sigpic14547_7.gif
JEllis is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      07-12-2007, 07:45 PM   #7
13eastie
Lieutenant
 
13eastie's Avatar
 
Drives: 2007 E92 M3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: London

Posts: 563
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Quote:
Originally Posted by RussianM3_dude View Post
And proper brakes this time... AND possibly the M LSD.
I can't blame anyone for taking the chance to wait... but I'm happy to bet there will not be an M1 (they certainly won't use that name) with a LSD and while you're waiting to find out, I will clock up 50k miles of happy M-driving...
13eastie is offline   United Kingdom
0
Reply With Quote
      07-12-2007, 08:26 PM   #8
lucid
Major General
 
lucid's Avatar
 
Drives: E30 M3; Expedition
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA

Posts: 8,034
iTrader: (0)

So what exactly is this guy saying? How exactly is the M3's weight and cost "not dissimilar" from the M5? (Of course there is no mention of handling and character). And, by the same token, why should someone even consider the 135 as a serious alternative to the M3 just because it costs and weighs less? Then we should all be driving the new Evo?

Here are the differences and outlining contradictions what he's saying:

Weight:
135i (~1450kg); M3 (1650kg); M5(1830kg)

Cost:
135i (~33,000); M3 (51,000); M5 (64600)


So, the M3-135 weight/cost differences are very similar to the M3-M5 weight/cost difference.

This is indeed rubbish.
lucid is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      07-13-2007, 03:31 AM   #9
southlight
Moderator / European Editor
 
southlight's Avatar
 
Drives: BMW
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Germany

Posts: 6,748
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by lucid View Post
So what exactly is this guy saying? How exactly is the M3's weight and cost "not dissimilar" from the M5? (Of course there is no mention of handling and character). And, by the same token, why should someone even consider the 135 as a serious alternative to the M3 just because it costs and weighs less? Then we should all be driving the new Evo?

Here are the differences and outlining contradictions what he's saying:

Weight:
135i (~1450kg); M3 (1650kg); M5(1830kg)

Cost:
135i (~33,000); M3 (51,000); M5 (64600)


So, the M3-135 weight/cost differences are very similar to the M3-M5 weight/cost difference.

This is indeed rubbish.
The weight of the 135i has already been published: 1560kg (EU standard).

So the weight to HP ratios are:

135: 5.1 kg/HP
M3: 3.9 kg/HP
M5: 3.6 kg/HP

Best regards, south
southlight is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      07-13-2007, 07:16 AM   #10
lucid
Major General
 
lucid's Avatar
 
Drives: E30 M3; Expedition
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: USA

Posts: 8,034
iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by southlight View Post
The weight of the 135i has already been published: 1560kg (EU standard).

So the weight to HP ratios are:

135: 5.1 kg/HP
M3: 3.9 kg/HP
M5: 3.6 kg/HP

Best regards, south
Thanks for the info (135 is indeed heavier than I thought). There is still a difference for both the 135/M3 and M3/M5. Cost is clearly more so. The M3 and the M5 are different in so many other respects as well.

Also, keep in mind that BMW has severely underrated the 135 engine on paper (I don't think the same is true for the M3 engine). My understanding is that it is putting out more like 340hp+ on dyno testing, which would bring the 135 kg/HP ratio to ~4.5.
lucid is offline   United_States
0
Reply With Quote
      07-13-2007, 08:11 AM   #11
sdiver68
Expert Road Racer
 
Drives: 07 335i e90, 09 335i e93
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: St. Louis, MO

Posts: 1,330
iTrader: (3)

Quote:
Originally Posted by lucid View Post
Thanks for the info (135 is indeed heavier than I thought). There is still a difference for both the 135/M3 and M3/M5. Cost is clearly more so. The M3 and the M5 are different in so many other respects as well.

Also, keep in mind that BMW has severely underrated the 135 engine on paper (I don't think the same is true for the M3 engine). My understanding is that it is putting out more like 340hp+ on dyno testing, which would bring the 135 kg/HP ratio to ~4.5.
+1...and +80HP (or more) is a simple chip perhaps exhaust away, so now we are talking 1450/420 = 3.45...assuming they haven't done something like delete the oil cooler, intercooler, etc. that would make that boost level difficult from a temp perspective.
sdiver68 is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
      07-13-2007, 08:52 AM   #12
Epacy
Reincarnated
 
Epacy's Avatar
 
Drives: 02 Maxima SE
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: IL

Posts: 4,227
iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2008 M3  [0.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdiver68 View Post
+1...and +80HP (or more) is a simple chip perhaps exhaust away, so now we are talking 1450/420 = 3.45...assuming they haven't done something like delete the oil cooler, intercooler, etc. that would make that boost level difficult from a temp perspective.
Here we go again. Now with the 135 with chip/intake/exhaust is better than the 335 and the M3.
135 rUlZ!!!!
__________________
Epacy is offline  
0
Reply With Quote
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:20 AM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST