BMW M3 Forum (E90 E92)

BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Go Back   M3Post - BMW M3 Forum > E90/E92 M3 Technical Topics > Suspension | Brakes | Chassis
 
Evolve Automotive
Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      03-14-2012, 02:50 PM   #1
Blade929
Lieutenant
United_States
11
Rep
435
Posts

 
Drives: E90 ///M
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Maryland

iTrader: (2)

Let me first start off by saying Iím not extremely technical but I do have some suspension experience with my E46, sport bikes and spend a good bit of time at the track supporting various friends both car and motorcycle. My E46 was fairly highly modded. In terms of suspension I had: UUC sways, Ground Control bits, RSM etc, and Bilstein PSS9s. When I purchased my M3 I was very unhappy esthetically with the wheel gap. At the time, I decided to purchase lowering springs with the intent of purchasing a coilover suspension once the market matured a bit and there were products I felt were a large performance increase over the stock suspension.

I purchased the H&R sport plus springs which interestingly are sometimes called race version and on H&Rs website it lists them as the race part number from EAS. These springs claimed a 1 inch front drop and .6 in the rear. I actually think itís slightly more than that in the front. The race springs have a higher spring rate and are progressive. They donít publish rate so itís hard to know what they really are and since itís non-linear Iím not sure how much help it would be. I can say visually it made the car much more appealing. The ride was firm but really not a problem for me. I daily drive the car about 90 miles a day and pretty much always leave the edc set for sport. Well, Iíve had the springs for about 2.5 or so years and now the car has 65k on it and I can feel the stock dampers starting to go.

I launched into a pretty exhaustive search about which coilovers to switch to based on some great information like rldzhaoís thread and then various reviews of KW, AST, Moton, Ground Control, TC Kline etc. I must say there are some outstanding threads contributed by members with excellent information. I really needed a quality suspension without a crazy rebuild cycle. I needed a suspension that wouldnít kill me during daily use. I wanted a suspension I could use for some track days and that was a performance upgrade from stock. The biggest ďchallengeĒ is that there are many quality suspensions available for our cars and the suspension ride quality is very subjective.

I had kind of committed to a double adjustable or triple because I felt the flexibility of individual compression and rebound adjustments would allow me to dial the suspension in to better suit my needs. At this point, I contacted Harold from HP Autowerks. Harold suggested the TCK DAs paired with Swift springs. I had been strongly leaning toward ASTs but Harold felt the design of the dampers vs the monotube design of the ASTs would allow for a more compliant street driving experience. I decided on 728lb rears with 448lb fronts.

Also included in my setup are Vorshlag camber plates, HPA adjustable sway bar links and Swift springs and thrust sheets. Haroldís customer service has been outstanding dealing with about 20 different questions I had. I would highly recommend him. Tomorrow, I have new tint being installed and the car goes the GT Performance here in Maryland on Friday for install. Check back for pictures and a review to follow.

Fairly current look with H&Rs for reference:



Appreciate 0
      03-14-2012, 02:51 PM   #2
Blade929
Lieutenant
United_States
11
Rep
435
Posts

 
Drives: E90 ///M
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Maryland

iTrader: (2)

Update: After the weekend install I can say overall I'm very happy. In all honesty, any negatives I would say are my fault rather than TCK or HPA. The good: the suspension is outstanding. I would say, in terms of ride quality, it is actually better than the stock EDC comfort setting. Granted this is all based on street driving. With the H&Rs the car would never settle while in a turn. I would constantly be fighting the car as the stock dampers probably could not handle the spring rates. I notice on their site it does say they highly suggest aftermarket dampers paired with those springs. The TCKs truly transform the handling. The car is planted and very compliant. The settings for rebound and compression are both set is the mid range so there is considerable amount of adjustment left. I will also put up my alignment settings but the camber is at the max of the BMW factory acceptable range which I believe was around 1.5 neg front and 1.7 neg rear. Like I said I drive about 90 miles each day and I don't want to much inside edge tire wear. The less than good: I probably should have gone with a higher spring rate. Ride quality is very subjective and I know for myself I could have easily tolerated a higher spring rate. The other concern for me is an aesthetic one. The front is set at its lowest and with a 7" spring there is still about 1 - 1.25 inches of gap. I'm sure if the car was corner balanced that performance wise this is appropriate however for me visually I would prefer the suspension was lower. I'm talking to Harold today to discuss my options. Again none of these "issues" are TCK or HPA issues they are purely mine and from the performance stand point I could very well be lessening the performance to gain appearance. The last issue has nothing to do with suspension but I feel important to share. I had been running 295/30 Hankooks on my Volk TE37s and switched to Michelin Pilot Super Sports. Well, the profile and a slight difference in the width is making them rub in the rear even though the rear is now actually a bit higher than it was with the springs. I plan on adding some more negative camber and this might be enough that it won't rub.
Picture of current setup


Last edited by Blade929; 03-21-2012 at 12:37 PM.
Appreciate 0
      03-14-2012, 04:56 PM   #3
flipm3
E46 + E90
Philippines
43
Rep
2,788
Posts

 
Drives: E46 M3 + E90 M3
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Illinois

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2009 BMW M3  [0.00]
2002 BMW M3  [0.00]
The TCK D/As get incredible reviews for the E46 M3 platform. I am looking forward to hearing how they are on the E90 M3! Keep us posted.
__________________
E90 M3 DCT|Melbourne Red . Speed Cloth | My Build Thread
E46 M3 6MT|Jet Black . Black Nappa Leather | My Build Thread
Appreciate 0
      03-20-2012, 06:27 AM   #4
Bubbles
Brigadier General
Bubbles's Avatar
Cayman Islands
86
Rep
3,560
Posts

 
Drives: Green Bastard
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bishop Bend

iTrader: (3)

Harold is great to deal with. My buddy went with a tckline set up for his 135 and it has transformed the car.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      03-20-2012, 07:03 AM   #5
dawgdog
Colonel
29
Rep
2,178
Posts

 
Drives: 2015 M3, 2010 GT3RS
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Seattle, Wa.

iTrader: (0)

Really nice looking car! I have worked with Harold on an AST suspension and I have nothing but positive things to say.
__________________
2015 f80 M3, 2010 GT3RS
Appreciate 0
      03-20-2012, 07:14 AM   #6
IMG
M.POWER
IMG's Avatar
104
Rep
7,065
Posts

 
Drives: E36 M3 Track car,Ess E90 M3 DD
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Location

iTrader: (6)

I got all my 135 suspensions bits from Harold,really helpful experienced guy.
Thanks for the write up & sick looking ride !
__________________
NO FEAR.NO LIMITS.NO EQUAL

Ess VT3 LC built motor,Volk TE37SL,Euro taillights,Dinan Xpipe,Custom Headers,Akra axle back CF tips,ModeCarbon FR lip,BMW CF wing
LOW BOOST 60-130 6.7 sec
Appreciate 0
      03-20-2012, 08:19 AM   #7
THE TECH
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
THE TECH's Avatar
United_States
157
Rep
13,121
Posts


 
Drives: BPMsport 2012 E92 M3
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Kansas

iTrader: (45)

Garage List
Send a message via AIM to THE TECH Send a message via Skype™ to THE TECH
Car looks good as-is. Can't wait to see it after the new suspension.
__________________
Appreciate 0
      03-20-2012, 01:46 PM   #8
TC Kline Racing
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
TC Kline Racing's Avatar
United_States
7
Rep
330
Posts


 
Drives: Many BMW's & Porsche's
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Columbus, OH & Santa Barbara, CA

iTrader: (0)

OP, congrats on your new suspension....you will love it!

....in for pics
Appreciate 0
      03-20-2012, 10:00 PM   #9
1&done
Major
1&done's Avatar
United_States
10
Rep
1,016
Posts

 
Drives: 2011 VO 1M
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Tampa, FL

iTrader: (22)

Garage List
2011 BMW 1M  [5.00]
2008 Mini Cooper S  [0.00]
2014 VW Passat  [0.00]
2008 135i SOLD  [5.00]
Send a message via AIM to 1&done
Yep, Harold is a good dude, that's who I used. I wouldn't mind trying out the TC Klines. My ASTs perform very well!
__________________
///1M #643 of #740 / Ohlins R&T / AR Design catless DPs / N55 Mids / HPF OCC / ER CP / BMWP Rear Spoiler
Appreciate 0
      03-21-2012, 12:59 PM   #10
Blade929
Lieutenant
United_States
11
Rep
435
Posts

 
Drives: E90 ///M
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Maryland

iTrader: (2)

updated...
Appreciate 0
      03-21-2012, 01:12 PM   #11
STALKER
Brigadier General
50
Rep
3,663
Posts

 
Drives: 2008 E90 M3, 991 C4S, 997 GT3
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto, ON

iTrader: (5)

Your spring rates seem right for a dual purpose car, try stiffening the shocks a touch to get the feel you want.
__________________

2008 AW/FR E90 M3-SOLD
2013 991 C4S-SOLD
2010 GT3
Appreciate 0
      03-21-2012, 03:44 PM   #12
KennyPowers
Brigadier General
95
Rep
4,637
Posts

 
Drives: .....
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gulf Coast

iTrader: (13)

IMO that ride height looks awesome

If i ever got seriously into tracking my car id rather go TCK than KW.

Glad to see TCK get some positive feedback here on M3post
__________________
2015 M3 6MT
Appreciate 0
      03-21-2012, 06:45 PM   #13
Blade929
Lieutenant
United_States
11
Rep
435
Posts

 
Drives: E90 ///M
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Maryland

iTrader: (2)

After speaking with Harold this afternoon I've decided to change nothing but the suspension settings. Stalker was dead on that I needed to make adjustments. Tonight I've dailed more stiffness into the compression in the rear and into the front rebound. I'm waiting on the rest of the optimal settings from Harold. In the future, I could always swap out springs for lower front springs. Again Harold and HP Autowerks service has been exceptional. I'll take some better pictures this weekend. I'm also going to add some negative campber to the rear to try to address the rubbing. Hopefully that will be enough rather than having to switch to a 285.
Appreciate 0
      03-21-2012, 08:31 PM   #14
dawgdog
Colonel
29
Rep
2,178
Posts

 
Drives: 2015 M3, 2010 GT3RS
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Seattle, Wa.

iTrader: (0)

I think it looks fine at this ride height.
__________________
2015 f80 M3, 2010 GT3RS
Appreciate 0
      03-22-2012, 07:04 AM   #15
Blade929
Lieutenant
United_States
11
Rep
435
Posts

 
Drives: E90 ///M
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Maryland

iTrader: (2)

Harold sent me the optimized settings however I have not had a chance to adjust them since last night. I can say that even with the adjustments I made last night there is an incredible range of adjustment. I would say that just changing 2 clicks of compression on the rear was equal to about the entire range of adjustment on my Bilstein PSS9s on my E46. Pretty amazing.
Appreciate 0
      03-22-2012, 01:58 PM   #16
TC Kline Racing
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
TC Kline Racing's Avatar
United_States
7
Rep
330
Posts


 
Drives: Many BMW's & Porsche's
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Columbus, OH & Santa Barbara, CA

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by KennyPowers View Post
IMO that ride height looks awesome

If i ever got seriously into tracking my car id rather go TCK than KW.

Glad to see TCK get some positive feedback here on M3post
Agreed!!
Appreciate 0
      03-22-2012, 02:31 PM   #17
aus
Major General
118
Rep
7,416
Posts

 
Drives: Odysse
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Seal Beach, CA

iTrader: (5)

Any lower and it'll look rice. Enjoy the suspension.
__________________
Let me get this straight... You are swapping out parts designed by some of the top engineers in the world because some guys sponsored by a company told you it's "better??" But when you ask the same guy about tracking, "oh no, I have a kid now" or "I just detailed my car." or "i just got new tires."
Appreciate 0
      03-23-2012, 04:33 PM   #18
HP Autosport
BimmerPost Supporting Vendor
United_States
418
Rep
11,446
Posts


 
Drives: F80 M3
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Santa Barbara, Brembo, GIAC, Koni, Ohlins, Performance Friction, Quaife, Stoptech, Vorshlag

iTrader: (29)

[/quote]

I couldn't picture your car when we spoke on the phone. Your car looks great! If anything, I would get the rear slightly lower for less of a rake, but that could be just the photo doing its trick. You will need to measure it to be sure.

Lower is not better in this case. These cars need all the compression travel they can get to handle all the road imperfections and bumps. Otherwise the car just gets upset from each little bump you hit, not to mention the negative affect on the handling.
Appreciate 0
      04-12-2012, 08:46 AM   #19
Blade929
Lieutenant
United_States
11
Rep
435
Posts

 
Drives: E90 ///M
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Maryland

iTrader: (2)

Here's another quick update: I took the car back to GTP to increase the negative camber in the rear to account for the rubbing I'm having with the 295 Pilot SS on my Volks. I'm now running 2.5 degrees neg. I also adjusted the suspension and am now very happy with the setup for my tastes. I'm running 6 out of 9 clicks in the rear for compression. (9 being full stiff) and 8 out of 12 clicks in the front for compression. For rebound I'm running front 2 sweeps from full soft, rear rebound at at 1.5 sweep from full soft.
Appreciate 0
      04-13-2012, 09:38 AM   #20
lcrain
Captain
14
Rep
840
Posts

 
Drives: e36 m3, TT-RS
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Dallas, TX

iTrader: (1)

Blade or Harold feel free to comment here.

To a suspension layman like myself, what are the major advantages/disadvantages of the TCK vs. AST. I will be in the market in due time and have essentially narrowed it down to these two options (single vs. double adjustable is a different story). I seem to be in a similar position to blade as this car is my daily (though considerably less miles/day) so I don't want something that will punish me on the streets. So essentially what are the differences and what kind of driving/person do these cater to best?
Appreciate 0
      04-13-2012, 02:07 PM   #21
Blade929
Lieutenant
United_States
11
Rep
435
Posts

 
Drives: E90 ///M
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Maryland

iTrader: (2)

Harold or others can correct me but my understanding was that the damping force from a monotube shock is generated more quickly. So if you graphed it the line would be more steep with a monotube shock vs a twin tube. On the street it was explaned to me that the twin tube ride would be "better". Here's a decent video from KW showing the twin tube design:

Appreciate 0
      04-16-2012, 03:55 PM   #22
edwinm3
Colonel
edwinm3's Avatar
United_States
38
Rep
2,117
Posts

 
Drives: E92 MELBOURNE RED M3
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Doral

iTrader: (10)

I had TC Klines on my E46 and they were awesome, bought them new from TC Kline. I'm thinking about doing the same on my E90
__________________
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:10 PM.




m3post
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST